New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

I'm crying, please get a camera. Oh and by the way no aid for you

EatTheRich

President
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/450363-the-4-house-democrats-who-voted-against-the-border-funding-bill

Rather unfortunate situation wouldn't you say? Who the hell would vote down the provision of monies that would fund the provision of the basic necessities needed to care for the individuals detained at the centers on the border
Was every dollar in the bill earmarked to fund basic necessities for the prisoners in the camps? Or would it just have meant more guns for the guards who are arresting people trying to bring the prisoners water?
 

EatTheRich

President
The wall would have been a better idea. Fewer animals crossing. Fewer animals trying to cross.

To bring you up to speed with what has happened, these animals were not Americans arrested and imprisoned without a trial.


These animals ILLEGALLY crossed the border. So far, TWO presidents have locked them up until their hearing.

They would have been better off staying in their shithole countries.
If they were imprisoned without trial, or even a hearing to determine whether their asylum claims would be valid (an affirmative defense against the charge of crossing the border illegally), how do you know they illegally crossed the border?

What other misdemeanors do you think people should be put in cells meant for 1/3 as many people without soap or toothbrushes for weeks for?
 

EatTheRich

President
how do you solve the humanitarian crisis. they need aid? or they do not need aid?
They need aid, but the executive branch has refused to supply it and actively sought to do them harm. Ergo, we need an alternative solution:

1. Through multiparty elections overseen by the UN, allow the inmates of the camps to elect camp governing committees and a national governing committee for everyone in the camps.
2. Exempt everyone now or originally from the concentration camps from arrest by the U.S.’s governments without the written request from the national governing committee.
3. Turn over all resources of the Border Patrol and ICE to this committee, along with any FEMA or military resources the Red Cross determines them to need.
 

EatTheRich

President
First, get the Nazis out of Congress. They created the problem by telling those animals that bringing a child would get them citizenship.

Second. Finish the wall. Put a nice big beautiful DOOR on that wall and invite the world. Tell the animals to get in line like everyone else.

If someone tried to break in front of a liberal in a Starbucks, there would be pants wetting and an attempted fistfight. These same liberals don't seem to have a problem with animals doing it to our southern border.
You want Ron Paul out of Congress? Also, he said that?
 

EatTheRich

President
A wall,so you are saying Trump is the one who would keep the illegals out of cages with a wall but not "you people."

Interesting.
Israel has a wall and they still put “illegal” Palestinians in cages. Australia has an ocean around it and it has a ton of “illegal” Pacific Islanders in cages.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
If they were imprisoned without trial, or even a hearing to determine whether their asylum claims would be valid (an affirmative defense against the charge of crossing the border illegally), how do you know they illegally crossed the border?

What other misdemeanors do you think people should be put in cells meant for 1/3 as many people without soap or toothbrushes for weeks for?
It's takes sometimes years to bring one indicted citizen to trial, how in hell do you think they can process 100,000 over night? Did you not see the pictures of the Caravans and the number of illegals marching to the border and they KNEW they would be where they are 1000 miles before they illegal entered America.

Why do you progressives NEVER whine of combat troops going without soap and toothbrushes for weeks> I'd guess many of the illegals went much longer without soap and toothbrushes than weeks before they got here.

Do you see a rattlesnake and grab it, that's what they did by coming illegally....grabbed it.
 

EatTheRich

President
with republicans right there with them, hotshot. it is hard to believe how twisted your sense of history is. do you really think the republicans were against FDR moving west coast Japanese to internment camps? Are you really this uninformed? That they were more liberal than FDR on this issue?
1 liberal Republican, Rep. Jeanette Rankin of Montana, was publicly against it. Many other Republicans were for it, including Gov. Earl Warren of California, who gave the first order for mass detention and internment.

Are you trying to act stupid? Do you really think republicans were against separate but equal laws more than northern democrats?
Radical (leftist) Republicans, sure. Guys like Thaddeus Stevens or Robert Smalls. There were also conservative northern Democrats who were segregationists, like Benjamin Stapleton (mayor of Denver).

do you really think southern republicans were more in favor of the Civil Rights Act than southern democrats?
In 1866, 1871, 1875, definitely. When the Radical Republicans were identified with Radical Reconstruction.

Do you really think what people called themselves politically 150 years ago is all that relevant today, when it is the republican president making the racist comments telling black people to go back to Africa, and hardly any republicans complaining? and why do you continue to use the adjective form of democrat when using it as a subject? did you go to junior high, at all?
I know I am nitpicking. You do make some really good points here.

If you’re curious, some talking heads came up with the idea of calling the Democratic Party “the Democrat Party” in order to avoid asserting that there was anything democratic about it and to emphasize the “-rat” ending. And some conservatives dutifully took that usage as their marching orders, but it was too complicated for them to get it right, and they reversed the direction of the word substitution.

here is the breakdown of how democrats and republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964- have someone familiar with numbers and percentages explain how wrong you are-

no southern republican in the house voted for the civil rights act. not one. and the democrats held the south so firmly THERE WAS JUST ONE REPUBLICAN SENATOR FROM ANY CONFEDERATE STATES IN 1964 AND ONLY 10 SOUTHERN REPUBLICAN HOUSE MEMBERS......get it? here is the real deal-

By party and region

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

•Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7%–93%)
•Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0%–100%)
•Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%–6%)
•Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%–15%)

The Senate version:

•Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5%–95%)
•Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0%–100%)
•Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%–2%)
•Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%–16%)

Look at how completely the democrats held the south back then before they supported civil rights...in the whole tier of southern states there was 1 republican senator and 10 republican members of the house!!! and today it is almost reversed!! the democrats knew they were signing their own political death warrant by pushing thru Civil Rights, but they did it anyway, putting doing what is right before political gain.

name one time the republicans have done something so righteous.
To hold that segregationist wing of the party, the national leadership had to compromise with it. Just as the Republicans make compromises today to hold what segregationist support they have (minority but substantial and politically ascendant).
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
They need aid, but the executive branch has refused to supply it and actively sought to do them harm. Ergo, we need an alternative solution:

1. Through multiparty elections overseen by the UN, allow the inmates of the camps to elect camp governing committees and a national governing committee for everyone in the camps.
2. Exempt everyone now or originally from the concentration camps from arrest by the U.S.’s governments without the written request from the national governing committee.
3. Turn over all resources of the Border Patrol and ICE to this committee, along with any FEMA or military resources the Red Cross determines them to need.
1. 86 the UN they are not "inmates" they are damn illegals, why don't you rush on down and represent them?
2. FUBAR and there are NO concentration camps as what dems put Japs into.
3. You've lost your mind!
 

EatTheRich

President
It's takes sometimes years to bring one indicted citizen to trial, how in hell do you think they can process 100,000 over night? Did you not see the pictures of the Caravans and the number of illegals marching to the border and they KNEW they would be where they are 1000 miles before they illegal entered America.

Why do you progressives NEVER whine of combat troops going without soap and toothbrushes for weeks> I'd guess many of the illegals went much longer without soap and toothbrushes than weeks before they got here.

Do you see a rattlesnake and grab it, that's what they did by coming illegally....grabbed it.
If they cannot be afforded their constitutional right to a speedy trial, they must be presumed innocent and set free. Not my fault the ruling rattlesnakes decided to round up a bunch of people it can’t prove are criminals.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. 86 the UN they are not "inmates" they are damn illegals, why don't you rush on down and represent them?
2. FUBAR and there are NO concentration camps as what dems put Japs into.
3. You've lost your mind!
1. Who else could oversee those elections without the U.S. using its power of life or death over the inmates to terrorize them into ratifying its handpicked choice?
2. Yes, there are.
3. They need aid, no?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Israel has a wall and they still put “illegal” Palestinians in cages. Australia has an ocean around it and it has a ton of “illegal” Pacific Islanders in cages.
The Pope lives behind a WALL, Palestinians lob bombs into Israel daily and the cages where built for illegals by Clinton/Bush/Barry O and leftist were crickets, as I've advised you before, run on down and cross into mexico or STFU.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
And here you are supporting internment camps TODAY.
There are no internment camps as there were for Japs and you should be volunteering to be in Barry O's cages with the illegals, hell, YOU with all your knowledge could be the illegals committee Leader...………..GO
 
Top