Name those top execs...All the top execs of the main stream media are Democrats. I don't know it was always that way, but it is now.
Name those top execs...All the top execs of the main stream media are Democrats. I don't know it was always that way, but it is now.
Do your own Googling, I'm not your Go-ferName those top execs...
You claimed to have information that you do not. Roger Ailes was the last head of a News organization to have direct links to one of the political parties.Do your own Googling, I'm not your Go-fer
I did not make the original claim, it was done by one of you politicos, and that post showed where the upper execs at each of the main stream media were Democrats.You claimed to have information that you do not. Roger Ailes was the last head of a News organization to have direct links to one of the political parties.
Disney owns ABC. The CEO of ABC News is James Goldston. FEC only shows donations to the republican party.
Susan Zirinsky is the president of CBS news. No records of political donations.
Noah Oppenheim is the president of NBC news. No record of political donations.
So what is your evidence?
Your post;I did not make the original claim, it was done by one of you politicos, and that post showed where the upper execs at each of the main stream media were Democrats.
You want to try and convince us otherwise?
why not stay on topic? Did you even click on the Link in the top post? There was another video in that article, did you see that? watch it? Of course not, cuz you only show up in these threads to threadjack, eh?
How about we discuss the topic? Here's the video in the top post linked article:
So, you was saying that the main stream media has fair and unbiased coverage?
Looks fair to me. Your complaint seems to be that there is just not enough coverage...not that it is unfair.I did not make the original claim, it was done by one of you politicos, and that post showed where the upper execs at each of the main stream media were Democrats.
You want to try and convince us otherwise?
why not stay on topic? Did you even click on the Link in the top post? There was another video in that article, did you see that? watch it? Of course not, cuz you only show up in these threads to threadjack, eh?
How about we discuss the topic? Here's the video in the top post linked article:
So, you was saying that the main stream media has fair and unbiased coverage?
We had a top post a while back comparing the amount of stories ran by the main stream Democratic outlets: ABC, NBC, CBS, and two others. Comparing how many stories they ran on Kavanaugh's accuser versus Biden's accuser; and the numbers were like 160 stories by each outlet for kavanaugh's accuser while Biden's accuser received a grand total zero. (rising is a web-based show) The main stream media did another black-out.Looks fair to me. Your complaint seems to be that there is just not enough coverage...not that it is unfair.
How much coverage can you find of the time Trump's wife claimed he raped her?
I just did a search and there are articles in USA Today, National Review, CNBC, Time,We had a top post a while back comparing the amount of stories ran by the main stream Democratic outlets: ABC, NBC, CBS, and two others. Comparing how many stories they ran on Kavanaugh's accuser versus Biden's accuser; and the numbers were like 160 stories by each outlet for kavanaugh's accuser while Biden's accuser received a grand total zero. (rising is a web-based show) The main stream media did another black-out.
Jimmy Dore did a show on it ...
303,135 views
•Mar 26, 2020
... but none of the main stream media outlets would touch it. Why do you suppose that happened? You are saying it couldn't have been because the main stream media is Democratic. Well, I gotta tell ya, Tara Reade was a staffer working for Joe Biden, and she suddenly was fired, and no one has claimed she didn't do excellent work. Meanwhile, Kavanaugh's accuser never even met Kavanaugh, was a total stranger. Reade's story has corroberation from family, friends, and co-workers. Kavanaugh's accuser had zero corroberation, worse, everyone in her story denied any knowledge of it... and not a single family member would stand up for her, either. But the main stream media ran like hell with the accuser against the GOP, while they 100% suppressed the accuser against the Dems. funny that.
Salon came out with the story, and did a smear job on Reade. rising took issue with that...
166,723 views
•Apr 1, 2020
NYTimes and Washington Post finally did a smear job each, and that was about all we got from main stream media. rising did a video with another interviewer of Tara Reade and she tells you how the msm black balled this story...
94,954 views
•Mar 30, 2020
Reade filed a police report that says sometime between March 1 and May 31 1993 she was assaulted. She doesn't remember where the assault happened. She says she reported an incident of harassment, but not the assault. No record of the complaint can be found. Three of the five people she says she told say they have no memory of such a complaint.We had a top post a while back comparing the amount of stories ran by the main stream Democratic outlets: ABC, NBC, CBS, and two others. Comparing how many stories they ran on Kavanaugh's accuser versus Biden's accuser; and the numbers were like 160 stories by each outlet for kavanaugh's accuser while Biden's accuser received a grand total zero. (rising is a web-based show) The main stream media did another black-out.
Jimmy Dore did a show on it ...
303,135 views
•Mar 26, 2020
... but none of the main stream media outlets would touch it. Why do you suppose that happened? You are saying it couldn't have been because the main stream media is Democratic. Well, I gotta tell ya, Tara Reade was a staffer working for Joe Biden, and she suddenly was fired, and no one has claimed she didn't do excellent work. Meanwhile, Kavanaugh's accuser never even met Kavanaugh, was a total stranger. Reade's story has corroberation from family, friends, and co-workers. Kavanaugh's accuser had zero corroberation, worse, everyone in her story denied any knowledge of it... and not a single family member would stand up for her, either. But the main stream media ran like hell with the accuser against the GOP, while they 100% suppressed the accuser against the Dems. funny that.
Salon came out with the story, and did a smear job on Reade. rising took issue with that...
166,723 views
•Apr 1, 2020
NYTimes and Washington Post finally did a smear job each, and that was about all we got from main stream media. rising did a video with another interviewer of Tara Reade and she tells you how the msm black balled this story...
94,954 views
•Mar 30, 2020
today, yes, after Bernie Sanders quit the race, then they all came out with hit pieces on Reade.I just did a search and there are articles in USA Today, National Review, CNBC, Time,
the NY Times, CNN, NewsWeek, Washington Post, NBC....
spin spin spin ... just like the media.Reade filed a police report that says sometime between March 1 and May 31 1993 she was assaulted. She doesn't remember where the assault happened. She says she reported an incident of harassment, but not the assault. No record of the complaint can be found. Three of the five people she says she told say they have no memory of such a complaint.
Is there any new news to report? Were you thinking they should just run the same report over and over again?
Why lie? She says she reported harassment, not an assault. There is no record of her report. You say she was promptly fired, but her claim is that she was assaulted some time between March 1st and May 31st and she left working for Biden in August.spin spin spin ... just like the media.
so, she does remember where the assault happened - at the Capitol Building, just not exactly where inside the Capitol Building, in one of the gazillion corridors. So, already, we can't trust your hit piece for accuracy, right? She then followed protocol and reported the harassment to superiors, who did nothing. She then took the next step and filed a Congressional report on the incident and was promptly removed from her duties and then fired. The filing is sealed by Biden in his Congressional records. Any chance the media will ask Biden to release that document?
3 of the 5 superiors that she reported the incident to deny ever hearing it...
nice hit piece MV, did you write one like that against Kavanaugh's accuser? Of course not, you are more of the problem... Democratic propagandist.
Did you watch the videos in the post that you replied to twice? of course not. That was all in there, btw.
Hit piece? Seems pretty accurate to me.today, yes, after Bernie Sanders quit the race, then they all came out with hit pieces on Reade.
Incredible hypocrisy. But they did it because they are the propaganda arm of the Democratic party. Just like you, MV. spin spin spin
Reade did the interview on March 25th. Sanders dropped out on April 8th. The NY Times article was a few days later....so now your complaint is that the Times didn't release it in time for Bernie to win Wyoming?today, yes, after Bernie Sanders quit the race, then they all came out with hit pieces on Reade.
Incredible hypocrisy. But they did it because they are the propaganda arm of the Democratic party. Just like you, MV. spin spin spin
more curious, why do you make up a lie and then say I said it? I wrote this:Why lie? She says she reported harassment, not an assault. There is no record of her report. You say she was promptly fired, but her claim is that she was assaulted some time between March 1st and May 31st and she left working for Biden in August.
evidence that the record of her report is sealed?more curious, why do you make up a lie and then say I said it? I wrote this:
"She then took the next step and filed a Congressional report on the incident"
I did not specify what she filed, whether it was an assault or harassment, but you read it and say I did so and that I lied... this is your political style of argument, and it is exactly what the media did; attack and try to tear apart the story. Even going so far as to lie to do so.
Then you make the claim that there is no record of her report. The report would be part of the Congressional record of Biden, and Biden has those records sealed. So you are doing it again; attack and try to tear apart the story. Even going so far as to lie to do so.
Then you do it a 3rd time. Misquoting me again, where I said she was promptly stripped of her duties and then fired. You put those two ideas together into one and claim I wrote she was promptly fired... that's not what I wrote.
So you wrote a screed lying about Reade, I wrote a reply pointing out all the lies, and you come back with a screed lying about my reply.
Lost in any discussion with MV is the topic. The topic was the media being total hypocrites. Of course, you lied about that to begin with and then divert to a million tangents.
So now you argue that it was inaccurate to imply that you were posting of the assault when you wrote that she made a report on an incident...more curious, why do you make up a lie and then say I said it? I wrote this:
"She then took the next step and filed a Congressional report on the incident"
I did not specify what she filed, whether it was an assault or harassment, but you read it and say I did so and that I lied... this is your political style of argument, and it is exactly what the media did; attack and try to tear apart the story. Even going so far as to lie to do so.
Then you make the claim that there is no record of her report. The report would be part of the Congressional record of Biden, and Biden has those records sealed. So you are doing it again; attack and try to tear apart the story. Even going so far as to lie to do so.
Then you do it a 3rd time. Misquoting me again, where I said she was promptly stripped of her duties and then fired. You put those two ideas together into one and claim I wrote she was promptly fired... that's not what I wrote.
So you wrote a screed lying about Reade, I wrote a reply pointing out all the lies, and you come back with a screed lying about my reply.
Lost in any discussion with MV is the topic. The topic was the media being total hypocrites. Of course, you lied about that to begin with and then divert to a million tangents.
Do your own Googling. You have the time when it was filed and you know who's office it was filed under (Biden). The videos I posted and you didn't bother to watch said Biden has those files sealed... not unusual for a presidential candidate.evidence that the record of her report is sealed?