No.Iran made its concessions in return for the concessions made by ALL the other signatories.
If Iran had been the country to pull out of the deal, would it have been reasonable to expect the U.S. to continue complying?
No. There was a procedure (presenting evidence, making formal requests, and getting international support) that was supposed to be followed before access was granted. Sites were not off limits if that procedure was followed.
I can’t think of an example of their violating an agreement upheld by the other party or parties. Maybe some related to financing terrorism.No.
What is Iran's history with such things
Read the links.No. There was a procedure (presenting evidence, making formal requests, and getting international support) that was supposed to be followed before access was granted. Sites were not off limits if that procedure was followed.
Nope. The U.S. wanted access to any site in the country, on a moment’s notice, without going through channels. That such an absurd request (which obviously had nothing to do with the stated goal of inspections to prevent unauthorized nuclear weapons programs) was denied is not the same as sites being off-limits.Read the links.
Your lie has been exposed.
I answer your question. If you don't understand I don't know how I can make if simpler for you.sorry..that made no sense
Is this your way of saying "It's different" ?incongruous
what does Iraq then have to do with right now? A: nothing
though you affirm a point - this could be negotiated without violence, without reference to Iraq. yet, we have violence.
you're scapegoating and dissembling rather than addressing the topic at hand.
I answer your question. If you don't understand I don't know how I can make if simpler for you.
Your question
what did trump negotiate that anyone could or could not express faith in.
My answer
Nothing and that is reason why he hasn't.
Nobody should, could, or in this case, does, have any faith in him.
Is this your way of saying "It's different" ?
There were snapback sanctions had Iran violated the agreement first. Now there is no possibility of getting any deal. Trump's foreign policy is a disaster.We're not talking about nobody oh, we're talking specifically about Iran. Iran having a long history of violating agreements, and violence. I provided an article above
Meanwhile we've exited a toothless agreement, if Iran doesn't like it's Iran's prerogative to enter into negotiations as the peace-loving nation it claims to be, or not
Let's check a quote from the linkYou obviously didn't read the link.
They didn't violate the JCPOA till Trump withdrew from it.No.
What is Iran's history with such things
Sure there is. Iran simply needs to say let's negotiateThere were snapback sanctions had Iran violated the agreement first. Now there is no possibility of getting any deal. Trump's foreign policy is a disaster.
Did they have to violate the jcpoa after Trump withdrew from it? Was that their only option?They didn't violate the JCPOA till Trump withdrew from it.
The world is less safe because Trump is president.
They won't do that because they rightly don't trust Trump. Anyone who Trusts a man who has repeatedly stiffed his employees, and declared bankruptcy is just asking to for the same treatment. Trump has no credibility and its disastrous for American foreign policy.Sure there is. Iran simply needs to say let's negotiate
They won't do that because they rightly don't trust Trump. Anyone who Trusts a man who has repeatedly stiffed his employees, and declared bankruptcy is just asking to for the same treatment. Trump has no credibility and its disastrous for American foreign policy.
Yes, The US wasn't fulfilling their end of the deal. Why would they shutter their nuclear program without sanctions relief? That doesn't even make sense.Did they have to violate the jcpoa after Trump withdrew from it? Was that their only option?
If you don't trust the Iranians that much then just admit you want regime change.the world is less safe because a toothless unenforceable agreement like the jcpoa was allowed to occur. My bet is that we will learn in the not-too-distant future just how toothless it was
Yes, The US wasn't fulfilling their end of the deal. Why would they shutter their nuclear program without sanctions relief? That doesn't even make sense.
If you don't trust the Iranians that much then just admit you want regime change.
Trump doesn't have any credibility. His business dealings are just one example, I could go on all day, but I value brevity.I'm sure that's it. Iran doesn't want to negotiate with Trump because of his private business dealings.
what?as an aside are you saying Iran's people are awash in wealth given all the oil that they've been selling for these many decades?
Not when you can't trust your counter-party to uphold their agreement.I would think that peace-loving people would want to negotiate with whomever is sitting across the table from them.
And "America First" means that's not our problem.Meanwhile they're bombing things, is that not correct?