New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Iran now a year away from a nuclear weapon

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Proof they never stopped building the bomb.

Barry Hussein got punked on the world stage. What a moron.
Sure thing...they disabled enrichment on their only heavy water reactor, they gave up 90% of their stockpile of enriched uranium and dismantled ten thousand centrifuges and surrendered to inspections....and you think they were still building a bomb, in spite of the fact that inspectors, the intelligence services of Germany, Israel, France, the UK and the US say they are not....

When the deal was signed they were months away from having sufficient capabilities to build a bomb....Now, 6 years later they do not have a bomb...

Prove they never stopped building a bomb...
 

Mick

The Right is always right
There is evidence they were in compliance till Trump quit fulfilling our end of the bargain
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-04/news/iaea-says-iran-abiding-nuclear-deal
Bullshit. Israeli intelligence asked the iaea multiple times to investigate suspicious sites in Iran which the IAEA refused. Finally, they visited a site which the Iranians begged them not to visit and which the Iranians insisted was just a scrap metal storehouse. Radioactive material was found.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/tv-iaea-finds-traces-of-radioactive-material-at-iran-site-named-by-netanyahu/amp/

Like I said, you've got left wing dung for brains if you truly believe the Iranians were not trying to build a bomb. Clown.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
1. It was estimated that they were months away from having enough enriched uranium to build a bomb when the agreement was signed.
2. I don't know when they started preparing for this...was it when Trump abrogated the agreement over a year ago?
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
1. It was estimated that they were months away from having enough enriched uranium to build a bomb when the agreement was signed.
2. I don't know when they started preparing for this...was it when Trump abrogated the agreement 2 years ago?
if they were months away from having enough enriched material to produce one then. and the only thing limiting its advance was the nuke agreement (which did not impose any dismantling...) where are they today?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
if they were months away from having enough enriched material to produce one then. and the only thing limiting its advance was the nuke agreement (which did not impose any dismantling...) where are they today?
The Iranians disabled the enrichment capability of their heavy water reactor at Arak. They dismantled over 15,000 of centrifuges and surrendered 98% of their stockpile of enriched uranium.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33521655
 

Mick

The Right is always right
1. It was estimated that they were months away from having enough enriched uranium to build a bomb when the agreement was signed.
2. I don't know when they started preparing for this...was it when Trump abrogated the agreement over a year ago?
Nope. The deal allowed them to continue to enrich uranium.....just at lower levels. As long as that was the case they were never more than a few months to a year away if they wanted to build a bomb at any point. The only acceptable deal should have been zero enrichment which could have ended their nuclear program entirely. Obama wouldn't do that because it was "too difficult". And like the Israelis have mentioned there is undoubtedly secret activity going on.

Obama's plan did nothing to stop the Iranians. It just bought them time to continue their terrorist sponsorship.
 
Nope. The deal allowed them to continue to enrich uranium.....just at lower levels. As long as that was the case they were never more than a few months to a year away if they wanted to build a bomb at any point. The only acceptable deal should have been zero enrichment which could have ended their nuclear program entirely. Obama wouldn't do that because it was "too difficult". And like the Israelis have mentioned there is undoubtedly secret activity going on.

Obama's plan did nothing to stop the Iranians. It just bought them time to continue their terrorist sponsorship.
You can't make a bomb with uranium enriched to 3.67%. Which is all Iran was allowed in the JCPOA.
 
Evidence they have been violating the deal. Unless the OP is a lie.
They were allowed to make a certain amount of token amount of 3.67% enriched uranium under the JCPOA, which won't even make a nuclear bomb. All they have done at this point is make more 3,67% uranium than was allowed under the JCPOA.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
You can't make a bomb with uranium enriched to 3.67%. Which is all Iran was allowed in the JCPOA.
But they can quickly escalate from there to a bomb......and that doesn't include efforts in secret. As Mike Pompeo said any agreement that didn't reduce enrichment to zero and still allowed Iran to continue normal diplomatic relations and trade without heavy sanctions was a complete failure. For a regime that state sponsors terrorism, has defied nuclear agreements before, and can quickly build a bomb either way this was insanity.
 
Bullshit. Israeli intelligence asked the iaea multiple times to investigate suspicious sites in Iran which the IAEA refused. Finally, they visited a site which the Iranians begged them not to visit and which the Iranians insisted was just a scrap metal storehouse. Radioactive material was found.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/tv-iaea-finds-traces-of-radioactive-material-at-iran-site-named-by-netanyahu/amp/

Like I said, you've got left wing dung for brains if you truly believe the Iranians were not trying to build a bomb. Clown.
Check the date on your article. and check the date on when Trump left the JCPOA. Trump left the JCPOA which caused the the Iranians to fire up their enrichment... again.
 
But they can quickly escalate from there to a bomb......and that doesn't include efforts in secret. As Mike Pompeo said any agreement that didn't reduce enrichment to zero and still allowed Iran to continue normal diplomatic relations and trade without heavy sanctions was a complete failure. For a regime that state sponsors terrorism, has defied nuclear agreements before, and can quickly build a bomb either way this was insanity.
There were snapback sanctions if Iran violated the deal. Instead the sanctions snapped back when Iran was upholding their end of the deal. Now, what's Trump's goal? and his strategy to achieve it?
 

Mick

The Right is always right
There were snapback sanctions if Iran violated the deal. Instead the sanctions snapped back when Iran was upholding their end of the deal. Now, what's Trump's goal? and his strategy to achieve it?
Any deal that did not reduce enrichment to zero and didn't include heavy sanctions was and is non-negotiable. Look, the only country who's real national security is threatened by the Iranians having a nuclear bomb is our ally and the only Democratic nation in the region, Israel. If they say only a zero enrichment deal is the only deal to make with the Iranians that is probably sound advice coming from the most vulnerable.

Heavy sanctions or zero enrichment. If Iran's nuclear program isn't destroyed then it's economic well-being must be. One or the other.....not this left wing garbage.
 
Top