New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is the posting of semi-nude and/or nude photos against PJ rules?

LeilaniMP

Empress
@SW48 @bdtex @connieb @PhilFish

I, as well as a few others, have been under the impression that the posting of such photos is against the rules.

I have no desire to post such images, nor to see them.

However, it seems as if they're now permitted?

Yes or no? And what is the penalty for posting such things?

Thanks!
 

Jen

Senator
It has, in the past, been against the rules to post such things - after there was a rash of porn posting here. I don't know the view of the current admin on it or if the rules have been changed recently, but it needs to be reviewed and dealt with.
 

Caroljo

Senator
Well the ones that were posted yesterday were pretty raw.....don't know if the poster deleted them or one of the Mods.
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
Well the ones that were posted yesterday were pretty raw.....don't know if the poster deleted them or one of the Mods.
Yeah...the pictures of our new FLOTUS elect were raw...but don't forget, both she and The Donald have said they're proud of her 'raw' pictures....so that's that. And really, I've seen quite a few here claim that is true...it's "art" and nothing wrong with them. So what's the beef? She posed for them, she's proud of them...cons don't think they define who she is, so why not show the world what men usually hide in bathroom stalls to lust over.? In fact, instead of worrying about what she will wear to the inauguration, she could see if the Make-up company...BARE ESSENTIALS makes clothing as well. That'd bring in a YUUUUGE crowd to the inauguration.
 

Caroljo

Senator
Yeah...the pictures of our new FLOTUS elect were raw...but don't forget, both she and The Donald have said they're proud of her 'raw' pictures....so that's that. And really, I've seen quite a few here claim that is true...it's "art" and nothing wrong with them. So what's the beef? She posed for them, she's proud of them...cons don't think they define who she is, so why not show the world what men usually hide in bathroom stalls to lust over.? In fact, instead of worrying about what she will wear to the inauguration, she could see if the Make-up company...BARE ESSENTIALS makes clothing as well. That'd bring in a YUUUUGE crowd to the inauguration.
So that makes it ok to post them here??? Really? Wow....
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
So that makes it ok to post them here??? Really? Wow....
Of course. When the same photoshopped photos of Michelle with a 'bulge' and Hillary with a shit stain are posted here by the same poster(s) over and over as real...why the hell not REAL pictures of our glamorous Lady Trump? Which do you find more disgusting?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Yeah...the pictures of our new FLOTUS elect were raw...but don't forget, both she and The Donald have said they're proud of her 'raw' pictures....so that's that. And really, I've seen quite a few here claim that is true...it's "art" and nothing wrong with them. So what's the beef? She posed for them, she's proud of them...cons don't think they define who she is, so why not show the world what men usually hide in bathroom stalls to lust over.? In fact, instead of worrying about what she will wear to the inauguration, she could see if the Make-up company...BARE ESSENTIALS makes clothing as well. That'd bring in a YUUUUGE crowd to the inauguration.
At least she was Modeling, Θ mother wasn't being paid for her nudes photos as a profession...or was she paid?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
@SW48 @bdtex @connieb @PhilFish

I, as well as a few others, have been under the impression that the posting of such photos is against the rules.

I have no desire to post such images, nor to see them.

However, it seems as if they're now permitted?

Yes or no? And what is the penalty for posting such things?

Thanks!
Rule #8 says it is against rules
 

SW48

Administrator
Staff member
Supporting Member
@SW48 @bdtex @connieb @PhilFish

I, as well as a few others, have been under the impression that the posting of such photos is against the rules.

I have no desire to post such images, nor to see them.

However, it seems as if they're now permitted?

Yes or no? And what is the penalty for posting such things?

Thanks!
Yes it is against advertising rules
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
No, my advertisers don't allow ads to be placed on pages with nudity.
I didn't see any posted as Ads. Just pictures...like the photoshopped ones of Michelle O and Hillary except not photo-shopped. Melania said she's 'proud' of all her photos. So why are they now considered half-dressed and used to try to get someone banned? At least they're not photoshopped.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
I didn't see any posted as Ads. Just pictures...like the photoshopped ones of Michelle O and Hillary except not photo-shopped. Melania said she's 'proud' of all her photos. So why are they now considered half-dressed and used to try to get someone banned? At least they're not photoshopped.
Read Rule #8....................only one trying to get banned is poster that keeps re-posting photos..........why do libs not understand they are their own worse enemy while whining others are? Thank gawd no nude pictures of Mooch and Cow-In-Pant-Suits were posted.........puke!

What part of advertisers don't allow their products on threads with nudity?
 

SW48

Administrator
Staff member
Supporting Member
I didn't see any posted as Ads. Just pictures...like the photoshopped ones of Michelle O and Hillary except not photo-shopped. Melania said she's 'proud' of all her photos. So why are they now considered half-dressed and used to try to get someone banned? At least they're not photoshopped.
NinaS you are not reading what I am writing. We are not talking about ads that have nudity we are talking about posts that have nudity.

Advertising pays for this site. Those ads cannot appear on pages with nudity.

Personally I believe all the pictures of Malania that I have seen are very beautiful but if they are nudes they are not allowed. Not my rule but my advertisers rules.
 
I didn't see any posted as Ads. Just pictures...like the photoshopped ones of Michelle O and Hillary except not photo-shopped. Melania said she's 'proud' of all her photos. So why are they now considered half-dressed and used to try to get someone banned? At least they're not photoshopped.
Good Lord...
 
NinaS you are not reading what I am writing. We are not talking about ads that have nudity we are talking about posts that have nudity.

Advertising pays for this site. Those ads cannot appear on pages with nudity.

Personally I believe all the pictures of Malania that I have seen are very beautiful but if they are nudes they are not allowed. Not my rule but my advertisers rules.
Thanks for using small words. I hope it worked...
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
NinaS you are not reading what I am writing. We are not talking about ads that have nudity we are talking about posts that have nudity.

Advertising pays for this site. Those ads cannot appear on pages with nudity.

Personally I believe all the pictures of Malania that I have seen are very beautiful but if they are nudes they are not allowed. Not my rule but my advertisers rules.
There were nudes...thus the question about "What penalty?" That's the reason for the whole question, since those objecting to them being posted were saying that there's nothing wrong with her nude pictures and girl on girl nude photos. Maybe the people posting them didn't know it was against the rules. BTW...I'd guess the advertisers would find a 'fake bulge' more disgusting Photo shopped on the FLOTUS.
 
Top