Is the whistleblower real?

[PhilFish]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-whistleblower-may-not-testify-in-person-11570738009

we should know if this is a real person. might not be.



this agitative post brought to you by PhilFish, the letter B and the number 5

 

[ObamacareForever]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-whistleblower-may-not-testify-in-person-11570738009

we should know if this is a real person. might not be.

He or She is a real person but what if they aren't?
The allegations are what's important, not the whistle blower.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

He or She is a real person but what if they aren't?
The allegations are what's important, not the whistle blower.

The Constitution and due process are what's important, not liberals' desperation to GET TRUMP.

 

[PhilFish]

He or She is a real person but what if they aren't?
The allegations are what's important, not the whistle blower.

somebody has to make them.

 

[PhilFish]

The Constitution and due process are what's important, not liberals' desperation to GET TRUMP.

due process. yes

 

[ObamacareForever]

somebody has to make them.

Congress will be the ones making the allegations at the end of the day.

 

[PhilFish]

Congress will be the ones making the allegations at the end of the day.

so it could be that this whistleblower is a concoction...

 

[ObamacareForever]

due process. yes

The 4th/5th/6th amendments don't apply to impeachment. This isn't court.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

He or She is a real person but what if they aren't?
The allegations are what's important, not the whistle blower.

OK a 'whistleblower' says you cheated on your taxes- every year your entire life.
And you beat your wife.

Of course the whistleblower is made up- SO we need to investigate.

 

[Barbella]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-whistleblower-may-not-testify-in-person-11570738009

we should know if this is a real person. might not be.



this agitative post brought to you by PhilFish, the letter B and the number 5

I think his initials are AS

 

[ObamacareForever]

so it could be that this whistleblower is a concoction...

Possible, but even in that far-fetched scenario, its also possible for the allegations to be proven.

 

[ObamacareForever]

OK a 'whistleblower' says you cheated on your taxes- every year your entire life.
And you beat your wife.

Of course the whistleblower is made up- SO we need to investigate.

Macguire already said the whistleblower was credible.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

so it could be that this whistleblower is a concoction...

After it being 2nd and 3rd hand info. None of the first hand people coming forth.
A letter written over a month ago in legalese.
Now they want to testify in writing.

It's all fishy

 

[ObamacareForever]

After it being 2nd and 3rd hand info. None of the first hand people coming forth.

That's a lie, there was the 2nd whistleblower.

 

[PhilFish]

The 4th/5th/6th amendments don't apply to impeachment. This isn't court.

it's not a randomly occuring process... correct? there is some order and thresholds to it, yes?

 

[Nostra]

That's a lie, there was the 2nd whistleblower.

What's his name?

 

[PhilFish]

After it being 2nd and 3rd hand info. None of the first hand people coming forth.
A letter written over a month ago in legalese.
Now they want to testify in writing.

It's all fishy

it is true that this person was coached... I wiuld not be surprised it it is not a person but a concoction.

 

[PhilFish]

Possible, but even in that far-fetched scenario, its also possible for the allegations to be proven.

surely. or disproven

 

[Nutty Cortez]

That's a lie, there was the 2nd whistleblower.

The 2nd whistleblower was the one who told the first one.

So that was irrelevant.

 

[Alinvegas]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-whistleblower-may-not-testify-in-person-11570738009

we should know if this is a real person. might not be.



this agitative post brought to you by PhilFish, the letter B and the number 5

Sure. In writing is fine. Can I write it though?