the VP would preside over the senate, unless the VP is impeached him/herself...Yes, congress votes on the charges, the senate needs 2/3 to remove from office, and the John Roberts has to preside over the Senate.
Other than that there are no rules.
You asked for a 1st hand account and you received it.
If only right-wingers wouldn't endanger the whistleblower's career and life.the VP would preside over the senate, unless the VP is impeached him/herself...
which is all good n dandy. methinks we need to know that there is an accuser... a real one..
we're not going to constitutional hell in a handbasket on the fictional word of a fictional person..
that'd be some inglorious end to the country...
No, its corroboration.But it wasn't.
It was a feedback loop. The second whistleblower is actually the source for the first whistleblower , which means it’s all the same thing.
So the second whistleblower is actually the first, is actually the original.
The second whistleblower informs the first. The first whistleblower says what the second whistleblower is going to say, which feeds the loop
isnt that what the whistleblower is also doing...