Bugsy McGurk
President
It’s only about 20 minutes into the presentation of Trump's lawyers and the fact checkers are already overwhelmed.
Those poor bastards.
;-)
Those poor bastards.
;-)
I watched for 20 minutes and didn’t see a witness tape. I heard Trump’s lawyers spinning lies and doing anything but putting things in context.LOL! They are playing the witness tapes (with context). So of course, the left needs t gaslight us into thinking they are "lying."
P.S. Trump’s lawyers just highlighted Trump’s “no quid pro” denials AFTER he got caught, as if the denials of a nabbed lawbreaker are significant.LOL! They are playing the witness tapes (with context). So of course, the left needs t gaslight us into thinking they are "lying."
It’s only about 20 minutes into the presentation of Trump's lawyers and the fact checkers are already overwhelmed.
Those poor bastards.
;-)
Sounds like you’re falling for today’s jive.Yes. It is.
Lies of omission...by the house managers
As they literally read from submitted evidence...
They're reading from the house managers submitted evidence.Sounds like you’re falling for today’s jive.
How about Sekulow’s pitch that Trump issued his extortion demands because he was “concerned about corruption and burden sharing.”Yes. It is.
Lies of omission...by the house managers
As they literally read from submitted evidence...
Of course not. I’m saying what I said - Trump’s lawyers are lying about the evidence. Distorting it beyond recognition. What defense lawyers do when they have a guilty client.They're reading from the house managers submitted evidence.
Are you saying at the house managers submit a jive
They're reading verbatim transcripts, and then playing the actual video of what was said that created the transcript.Of course not. I’m saying what I said - Trump’s lawyers are lying about the evidence. Distorting it beyond recognition. What defense lawyers do when they have a guilty client.
And again, the lies and distortions come from the mouths of Trump’s lawyers.They're reading verbatim transcripts, and then playing the actual video of what was said that created the transcript.
That's not a distortion that's what's called verbatim
Here you go...What extortion demand? You're going off the rails today.
They read from submitted transcript and recorded testimony.And again, the lies and distortions come from the mouths of Trump’s lawyers.
Snippets, on occasion.They read from submitted transcript and recorded testimony.
Are they not?
You are sorely mislead. No extortion demands were made. I'm not going to read through one of your threads as if it were trial evidence. It's amusing that you think you have changed anyone's mind with your distortions.
Seems like the Defense doesn't play the same omission game that the democrats have done.Snippets, on occasion.
Which is not the issue when it comes to their lying.
I have no illusion about changing wingers’ minds, which are shaped by decades of intensive brainwashing. I merely pose questions. Winger dodging of such questions is even more revealing than any answers you might give.You are sorely mislead. No extortion demands were made. I'm not going to read through one of your threads as if it were trial evidence. It's amusing that you think you have changed anyone's mind with your distortions.
Actually, the defense will completely ignore at least 99.9% of the evidence.Seems like the Defense doesn't play the same omission game that the democrats have done.