New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

It’s not ‘a few bad apples’

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan
It’s not ‘a few bad apples’: It’s systemic police brutality as these 20 infamous cases prove



We need to break up police unions that stand up for these criminals.
Blue city insanity, alright. Why does this keep happening in places run by people like you?
 

reason10

Governor
It’s not ‘a few bad apples’: It’s systemic police brutality as these 20 infamous cases prove



We need to break up police unions that stand up for these criminals.
As usually. YOU ARE POSTING A BUNCH OF LIES.
Now for the facts. And facts don't care about your feelings.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/7-statistics-you-need-know-about-black-black-crime-aaron-bandler
1. Data shows that 93 percent of black homicide victims are killed by other blacks.

2. According to Riley, “Blacks commit violent crimes at 7 to 10 times the rate that whites do.”

3. Black crime is even more prevalent in the country’s largest cities and counties.

4. There were almost 6,000 blacks killed by other blacks in 2015.

By contrast, only 258 blacks were killed by police gunfire that year.

5. The percentage of blacks arrested for crimes is consistent with police reports.

6. According to Riley, “Black crime rates were lower in the 1940s and 1950s, when black poverty was higher” and “racial discrimination was rampant and legal.”

7. According to Mac Donald, “A straight line can be drawn between family breakdown and youth violence.”


Blacks die at the hands of blacks 93 percent of the time. This is because

BLACK LIVES DO NOT MATTER.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
It’s not ‘a few bad apples’: It’s systemic police brutality as these 20 infamous cases prove



We need to break up police unions that stand up for these criminals.
Wow, did you even read that before posting?

Some outright LIES.
Some of the cops found not guilty of any crime.
These are not abuses just because al Jazeera says so.

Sloppy and dishonest- the liberal way.
 

EatTheRich

President
You mean Communism. Considering they kill people for what they think. Or think opposite of the state.
Like Sandra Bland? Filiberto Ojeda Rios? Fred Hampton, Mark Clark, and Bobby Hutton? Julius and Ethel Rosenberg? Sacco and Vanzetti? Joe Hill? John Brown?
 

EatTheRich

President
Wow, did you even read that before posting?

Some outright LIES.
Some of the cops found not guilty of any crime.
These are not abuses just because al Jazeera says so.

Sloppy and dishonest- the liberal way.
Cops being acquitted demonstrates only that their violence is state-sanctioned.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
Cops being acquitted demonstrates only that their violence is state-sanctioned.
Their violence...when necessary or lawfully acceptable.
I won't doubt there's violence. If there wasn't we'd see a lot more dead police officers. And that's not allowed.

Not liking police officers doesn't mean you can make up lies about them to turn public sentiment against them. Does it?
 

EatTheRich

President
Their violence...when necessary or lawfully acceptable.
I won't doubt there's violence. If there wasn't we'd see a lot more dead police officers. And that's not allowed.

Not liking police officers doesn't mean you can make up lies about them to turn public sentiment against them. Does it?
“Lawfully acceptable”=sanctioned by the state. A state that protects the property of the rich, and its own Praetorian Guard, at the expense of the public safety.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
“Lawfully acceptable”=sanctioned by the state. A state that protects the property of the rich, and its own Praetorian Guard, at the expense of the public safety.
Poppycock. Removes the scummy lowlifes who threaten and harm the good.
Do you begrudge the garbagemen?
 

EatTheRich

President
Poppycock. Removes the scummy lowlifes who threaten and harm the good.
Do you begrudge the garbagemen?
Are you justifying the systematic police murder of working-class people (disproportionately people of color) by comparing those murdered to garbage?
 

Dino

Russian Asset
Are you justifying the systematic police murder of working-class people (disproportionately people of color) by comparing those murdered to garbage?
No, we kill 99.91% of the time those that are truly worthy of it. Those who have harmed or have killed others. That's the tough part of the job.
No one said "working class"
No one (disproportionately) kills people of color. The rate of the killing is the same or less as the %age who commit violent crimes.
The ones worth killing? Truly are human garbage.
 

EatTheRich

President
No, we kill 99.91% of the time those that are truly worthy of it. Those who have harmed or have killed others. That's the tough part of the job.
No one said "working class"
No one (disproportionately) kills people of color. The rate of the killing is the same or less as the %age who commit violent crimes.
The ones worth killing? Truly are human garbage.
It is supposed to be the job of the judicial system to decide who deserves to be punished for harming others. Not the unilateral decisions of police. Those you kill are almost all working class and disproportionately Black or Native (and criminal behavior by others of their race does not justify your killings without benefit of trial).
 

Dino

Russian Asset
It is supposed to be the job of the judicial system to decide who deserves to be punished for harming others. Not the unilateral decisions of police. Those you kill are almost all working class and disproportionately Black or Native (and criminal behavior by others of their race does not justify your killings without benefit of trial).
Well, you're being dishonest again. The numbers DO NOT suggest what you are. The numbers shot align proportionately with the incidences of suspects in violent crimes.
Cops often MUST kill without trial. If you try to apprehend murderers too many INNOCENT people will die. And guess what? The state DOES give the right of that determination into the hands of sworn officers.
Moving to Cuba soon?
 

EatTheRich

President
Well, you're being dishonest again. The numbers DO NOT suggest what you are. The numbers shot align proportionately with the incidences of suspects in violent crimes.
Cops often MUST kill without trial. If you try to apprehend murderers too many INNOCENT people will die. And guess what? The state DOES give the right of that determination into the hands of sworn officers.
Moving to Cuba soon?
How many of those killed by cops are so much as suspected of murder?
 
Top