Jerry Nadler steps in it again at his own hearing.

[EatTheRich]

Asking Nadler to show him what his question is based on makes him a slime?

Shouldn’t the Chair of the committee know what he is asking? Seems reasonable to me.

Where are the contempt charges?

He knew what it was based on. Lewandowski had the page in front of him. Nadler knew what the page said. Why is it important that he knew which paragraph on the page it was in?

 

[Nostra]

He knew what it was based on. Lewandowski had the page in front of him. Nadler knew what the page said. Why is it important that he knew which paragraph on the page it was in?

Nadler was clueless. Did you watch it?

 

[EatTheRich]

Nadler was clueless. Did you watch it?

No. I saw the transcript of the part referenced in this thread. The only thing Nadler was “clueless” about was which paragraph on the page he referenced contained the accusation he referenced.

 

[Nostra]

No. I saw the transcript of the part referenced in this thread. The only thing Nadler was “clueless” about was which paragraph on the page he referenced contained the accusation he referenced.

Ahh..............so you didn't see Nadler's deer in the headlights look when asked to show what he was basing his question on.

Got it.