Joe Biden should be arrested and charged

[Jen]

yeah...ever hear of Francisco Franco?

So frantic you bring up someone totally irrelevant to the discussion. Way to go.

 

[middleview]

So frantic you bring up someone totally irrelevant to the discussion. Way to go.

was Franco Italian? No. Was he a fascist? Yes. Blows your post outta the water.

 

[Jen]

was Franco Italian? No. Was he a fascist? Yes. Blows your post outta the water.

Bot at all

 

[middleview]

The House isn't investigating, silly.

The Democrats are.

For a HOUSE investigation- it must be done via a vote.
That gives the HOUSE subpoena power.

Right now, all you have are democrat committees trying to subpoena. Which is fine. The person being subpoenaed can ignore it and litigate.


How don't you understand this ?

Ignore a subpoena? That would be obstruction. No vote was required to investigate Clinton...no vote to investigate Benghazi...you guys invent rules to protect Trump....smells of desperation.

 

[middleview]

Biden is a Democrat. Laws in this country do not apply to Democrats. That's been proven time and time again.

And yet here you are saying the law doesn't apply to Trump.

 

[middleview]

Fascists are Italian.

really?

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

So anyone who called for an impeachment of Clinton or Obama should also have been arrested or only when someone expresses that opinion of a republican?

Only their political opponents, and only if Clinton and Obama were running for office at the time.

 

[Drumcollie]

Only their political opponents, and only if Clinton and Obama were running for office at the time.

Clinton would lose and Obama would choose a male for V.P.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

Ignore a subpoena? That would be obstruction. No vote was required to investigate Clinton...no vote to investigate Benghazi...you guys invent rules to protect Trump....smells of desperation.

Since it is not a House investigation, It's not obstruction- and you choose to litigate.
Hillary Clinton & Benghazi was not impeachment.

You should read up on such things before forming a biased, ignorant opinion.- comrade

 

[Alinvegas]

Ah back to the “lock her up” chants. That fascist tactic worked once, but now it looks pretty silly.

He is doing what your side is accusing Trump of doing, and yet you look right past it. How telling indeed.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Naturally he'll be issued subpoenas as relates his dealings in Ukraine. And refusal will be viewed as obstructive, and the inference can be drawn that he is guilty.

If you wait till he is elected President and try to impeach him then yes, all of that would true.

 

[Nostra]

Trump says the House impeachment inquiry is "unconstitutional" when it is actually strictly constitutional that the House of representatives conducts such an investigation. He claims he is entitled to have a lawyer and witnesses testify in the investigation...when it is obvious that the constitution says nothing at all about the president doing so. When impeachment hearings happen, that is when he is entitled to defend himself.

His refusal to provide requested documents or to allow his appointees or his lawyer to appear before the House is telling. He seems to think he can ignore the house subpoenas?
That, in itself, is obstruction.

It isn't illegal to not participate in a farce.

 

[Nostra]

The House isn't investigating, silly.

The Democrats are.

For a HOUSE investigation- it must be done via a vote.
That gives the HOUSE subpoena power.

Right now, all you have are democrat committees trying to subpoena. Which is fine. The person being subpoenaed can ignore it and litigate.


How don't you understand this ?

Yep.

Trump is forcing them into the court system where their farce will be exposed.

 

[Alinvegas]

Trump says the House impeachment inquiry is "unconstitutional" when it is actually strictly constitutional that the House of representatives conducts such an investigation. He claims he is entitled to have a lawyer and witnesses testify in the investigation...when it is obvious that the constitution says nothing at all about the president doing so. When impeachment hearings happen, that is when he is entitled to defend himself.

His refusal to provide requested documents or to allow his appointees or his lawyer to appear before the House is telling. He seems to think he can ignore the house subpoenas?
That, in itself, is obstruction.

Good for him. Not going to be pushed around by a buncha left wing pussies.

 

[middleview]

Good for him. Not going to be pushed around by a buncha left wing pussies.

That is one way to defend his defiance of the constitution.

 

[middleview]

It isn't illegal to not participate in a farce.

It is obstruction of justice when refusing to provide documents requested by the branch of government constitutionally chartered with oversight of the executive branch.

 

[Nostra]

It is obstruction of justice when refusing to provide documents requested by the branch of government constitutionally chartered with oversight of the executive branch.

Lies.

 

[middleview]

Since it is not a House investigation, It's not obstruction- and you choose to litigate.
Hillary Clinton & Benghazi was not impeachment.

You should read up on such things before forming a biased, ignorant opinion.- comrade

When was there a vote to investigate Bill Clinton?

 

[middleview]

Lies.

Yep, lying is also considered obstruction. Keep defending him. It is pretty amusing.

 

[middleview]

Only their political opponents, and only if Clinton and Obama were running for office at the time.

Both Bill Clinton and Obama were investigated by the republicans and both in their first term in office.