New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Joe Biden should be arrested and charged

D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
It is obstruction of justice when refusing to provide documents requested by the branch of government constitutionally chartered with oversight of the executive branch.
A request by its very definition can be denied.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
This is the problem with being an extreme partisan. Poor middleview doesn't even know there was an impeachment inquiry vote on Clinton. Wow!
After the investigation there was a vote....no vote prior to it. Trump is saying he has the right to have an attorney take part in the investigation. He is claiming the right to present witnesses in the investigation. That is just bizarre.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
and when they are subpoenaed? How about ordering an executive branch employee to refuse to testify?
When they are subpoenaed, a legal process begins. Trump, like any other person being persecuted or prosecuted, has the right to fight subpoenas. Surely even you know this, yes?
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
They will take it into the courts, as our Constitution provides.

Next?
Poor *middleview*. He actually believes a subpoena means game over and Trump has to hand over whatever Democrat cretins want.

Edited
 
Last edited by a moderator:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Once again you are spewing bullshit.

Vote to start impeachment on Oct 8, 1998.
That was not the vote to investigate. There will be a vote if articles of impeachment are drawn up as a result of the investigation. The investigation started in early 1994 with Robert Fiske, he was replaced by Ken Starr.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
After the investigation there was a vote....no vote prior to it. Trump is saying he has the right to have an attorney take part in the investigation. He is claiming the right to present witnesses in the investigation. That is just bizarre.

Due process afforded the President and afforded every other President in the House is "bizarre"? Wow. Your tiny brain still spits out its nonsense. Every other impeachment inquiry afforded the President that right. Why are Democrats afraid of the President's counsel being involved or allowing Republicans to subpoena witnesses? Only left wing kangaroo courts try to shut down due process and allowing ALL THE FACTS to be presented.
 

Nostra

Governor
That was not the vote to investigate. There will be a vote if articles of impeachment are drawn up as a result of the investigation. The investigation started in early 1994 with Robert Fiske, he was replaced by Ken Starr.
Fiske and Starr didn't start an impeachment investigation. You really need an education on how our system works.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Poor *middleview*. He actually believes a subpoena means game over and Trump has to hand over whatever Democrat cretins want.

Edited
Funny how your opinions of the process have changed since Trump came into office. Seems the republicans voted Holder was in contempt of congress for refusing to turn over documents they requested.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Once again you are spewing bullshit.

Vote to start impeachment on Oct 8, 1998.
The vote was in committee to accept the articles of impeachment. Has anyone drawn up articles of impeachment yet? Was there any vote prior to that vote related to impeachment?
 
Top