Winston
Do you feel lucky, Punk
So the emails were deleted by accident, from an illegal server that set itself up also by accidentThe evidence that there was no deliberate deletion of work-related emails.
Gotcha
So the emails were deleted by accident, from an illegal server that set itself up also by accidentThe evidence that there was no deliberate deletion of work-related emails.
Wrong. There is no doubt she had classified material on an unsecure server. Each email is a felony.The evidence exonerated Clinton, yes.
She deleted tens of thousands of emails that were under subpoena.The evidence that there was no deliberate deletion of work-related emails.
The work-related emails were deleted because the software designed to filter personal from work-related emails misclassified a tiny handful of the work-related emails as personal. The FBI was able to recover about half of all the deleted emails and checked every one of them; they found that of the ones they recovered about 1% were work-related and there was no pattern to them indicating that they were deleted in order to hide wrongdoing.So the emails were deleted by accident, from an illegal server that set itself up also by accident
Gotcha
If she did so willfully, yes. Not if she just didn’t grasp the distinction between a private account (which Colin Powell advised her to use because it was more secure than the government system) and having a private server.Wrong. There is no doubt she had classified material on an unsecure server. Each email is a felony.
No, she didn’t. Her political opponents like to suggest that this is the case. What really happened was that she got a subpoena and turned over the emails that were under subpoena. And also deleted tens of thousands of emails that were outside the scope of the subpoena.She deleted tens of thousands of emails that were under subpoena.
She already testified that the emails were deleted by her lawyers.The work-related emails were deleted because the software designed to filter personal from work-related emails misclassified a tiny handful of the work-related emails as personal. The FBI was able to recover about half of all the deleted emails and checked every one of them; they found that of the ones they recovered about 1% were work-related and there was no pattern to them indicating that they were deleted in order to hide wrongdoing.
No what the FBI did was show that there is a two-tier justice systemTime to let this go. The FBI did a thorough investigation. I accept it.
Yes. She instructed her lawyers to delete her personal emails from before 2011, and they did. They accidentally deleted a few of her work-related emails too.She already testified that the emails were deleted by her lawyers.
Do you have fun making stuff up?
Did anyone ever tell you that you are really weird?
Bye the way these emails were not deleted, as the Russians, Chinese and the NSA still have every one of them
if that lie makes you feel better fine but it's still a lie.Yes. She instructed her lawyers to delete her personal emails from before 2011, and they did. They accidentally deleted a few of her work-related emails too.
Link?The work-related emails were deleted because the software designed to filter personal from work-related emails misclassified a tiny handful of the work-related emails as personal. The FBI was able to recover about half of all the deleted emails and checked every one of them; they found that of the ones they recovered about 1% were work-related and there was no pattern to them indicating that they were deleted in order to hide wrongdoing.
She set up her private server willfully. She accepted the job as SOS willfully.If she did so willfully, yes. Not if she just didn’t grasp the distinction between a private account (which Colin Powell advised her to use because it was more secure than the government system) and having a private server.
Nope. More stuff you are making up.Yes. She instructed her lawyers to delete her personal emails from before 2011, and they did. They accidentally deleted a few of her work-related emails too.
Nope. She deleted emails under subpoena.No, she didn’t. Her political opponents like to suggest that this is the case. What really happened was that she got a subpoena and turned over the emails that were under subpoena. And also deleted tens of thousands of emails that were outside the scope of the subpoena.
I delete a monumental amount of spam every day. 30,000 seems like a fairly reasonable amount of emails to delete.Nope. She deleted emails under subpoena.
Do you really believe she had over 30,000 emails about yoga and Chelsea's wedding?
Yes, they prosecute crimes they can secure a conviction and don't bother with the ones they know they know they will lose. You can call that 2 tiered.No what the FBI did was show that there is a two-tier justice system
You are not under obligation to hand over every work related email to archive. What you do is not relevant to this situation.I delete a monumental amount of spam every day. 30,000 seems like a fairly reasonable amount of emails to delete.
I would just love them for them to bring charges. So Hillary can face a jury of her peers. The prosecution would lose the case in 10 seconds flat.You are not under obligation to hand over every work related email to archive. What you do is not relevant to this situation.
She deleted those just days after they came under subpoena.
Before I informed you of that you babbled that software deleted them...Yes. She instructed her lawyers to delete her personal emails from before 2011, and they did. They accidentally deleted a few of her work-related emails too.
Wrong again.I would just love them for them to bring charges. So Hillary can face a jury of her peers. The prosecution would lose the case in 10 seconds flat.