New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Judge Rules Rachel Maddow is Fake News -and Not a Journalist

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
On Friday a judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow by the upstart network One America News


What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.

Maddow had inserted her own colorful commentary into and throughout the segment, laughing, expressing her dismay (i.e., saying ‘I mean, what?’) and calling the segment a ‘sparkly story’ and one we must ‘take in stride,'” Judge Cynthia Bashant wrote Friday.
This is a rather amazing stance for a member of the media to take. Here we have Maddow essentially resorting to the convenient dodge more popularly employed by the likes of John Stewart from his tenure of the satirical ‘’The Daily Show’’. At times when he would be caught delivering an inaccuracy or potentially slanderous commentary he could fall back on, ‘’It’s only satire, who fact-checks jokes?’’ It is a far different scenario for Maddow, who cloaks herself as being a serious journalist, to resort to the clown nose on/clown nose off act of deflection.


In the process of denigrating OAN as an illegitimate news source, Rachael Maddow had to rest on the defense that what she was delivering was itself illegitimate ‘’infotainment’’. By her own admission, the primetime hostess has declared her own words to be little more than sparkly storytelling.

It managed to get Rachael Maddow to declare in court records that she is a fabulist whose reporting does not need to be taken as the least bit accurate.


 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
In other words, she does a show where she provides her opinions.

This seems to take right wing potato heads by surprise.

;-)

Better call MSNBC and every other outlet that calls 'her' a 'journalist'
You really suck at this.




 

Jack4freedom

Governor
On Friday a judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow by the upstart network One America News


What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.


This is a rather amazing stance for a member of the media to take. Here we have Maddow essentially resorting to the convenient dodge more popularly employed by the likes of John Stewart from his tenure of the satirical ‘’The Daily Show’’. At times when he would be caught delivering an inaccuracy or potentially slanderous commentary he could fall back on, ‘’It’s only satire, who fact-checks jokes?’’ It is a far different scenario for Maddow, who cloaks herself as being a serious journalist, to resort to the clown nose on/clown nose off act of deflection.


In the process of denigrating OAN as an illegitimate news source, Rachael Maddow had to rest on the defense that what she was delivering was itself illegitimate ‘’infotainment’’. By her own admission, the primetime hostess has declared her own words to be little more than sparkly storytelling.

It managed to get Rachael Maddow to declare in court records that she is a fabulist whose reporting does not need to be taken as the least bit accurate.


BotTom line is that frivolous lawsuit by right wing tabloid news turd factory was thrown out of court. Good.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
Madcow needs another episode with Parnut and Fruitman again so you can salivate over your hoaxes. That was good stuff!
I‘m sure Lev will be on again before and after testifying in his trial starting on October 5th. Trump/Guiliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman are accused of slushing Russian Mob money into the coffers of GOP candidates. Also Parnas was involved in the Trump/Guiliani scheme that ended up getting Trump impeached. It should be a real hum dinger of a trial. Thanks for bringing it up again champy. You are like the jelly of the month club.....The gift that keeps on giving the whole year through.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
I‘m sure Lev will be on again before and after testifying in his trial starting on October 5th. Trump/Guiliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman are accused of slushing Russian Mob money into the coffers of GOP candidates. Also Parnas was involved in the Trump/Guiliani scheme that ended up getting Trump impeached. It should be a real hum dinger of a trial. Thanks for bringing it up again champy. You are like the jelly of the month club.....The gift that keeps on giving the whole year through.
Edited

And, by the way, in case you missed it.....there are only two people on trial here. Parnut and Fruitman. There is no accusation that anyone else did anything wrong. The two criminals were the two you hung on their every word to push your alt-left conspiracy. Now they are going to go to prison and your are wearing a dunce cap. Seems about right...

*chuckles*
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jack4freedom

Governor
Edited

And, by the way, in case you missed it.....there are only two people on trial here. Parnut and Fruitman. There is no accusation that anyone else did anything wrong. The two criminals were the two you hung on their every word to push your alt-left conspiracy. Now they are going to go to prison and your are wearing a dunce cap. Seems about right...

*chuckles*
I wonder why Trump and Rudy were associating a couple Russian Mobsters like these two? Why would a couple crooks like them be over in Ukraine doing Trumps bidding? Seems pretty f*cken shady, don’t you think....
 
On Friday a judge dismissed a lawsuit brought against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow by the upstart network One America News


What has not been properly acknowledged is that in order for her to evade responsibility in the case Maddow took on the defense that she was not delivering fact-based news on her program that evening, something the judge agreed was accurate.


This is a rather amazing stance for a member of the media to take. Here we have Maddow essentially resorting to the convenient dodge more popularly employed by the likes of John Stewart from his tenure of the satirical ‘’The Daily Show’’. At times when he would be caught delivering an inaccuracy or potentially slanderous commentary he could fall back on, ‘’It’s only satire, who fact-checks jokes?’’ It is a far different scenario for Maddow, who cloaks herself as being a serious journalist, to resort to the clown nose on/clown nose off act of deflection.


In the process of denigrating OAN as an illegitimate news source, Rachael Maddow had to rest on the defense that what she was delivering was itself illegitimate ‘’infotainment’’. By her own admission, the primetime hostess has declared her own words to be little more than sparkly storytelling.

It managed to get Rachael Maddow to declare in court records that she is a fabulist whose reporting does not need to be taken as the least bit accurate.


Out of all the opinion programming on all the networks, Fox, CNN, and MSNBC she is far and away the least talented.
 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
BotTom line is that frivolous lawsuit by right wing tabloid news turd factory was thrown out of court. Good.
Sometimes the damning admittance is worse than the crime.

For Maddow, it's having to admit that she's not a legitimate journalist to avoid prosecution if she were.

Or like Hillary Clinton, who had to admit that she didn't plan on having emails on secret servers, or ignoring warnings in BenGhazi.. she was just either oblivious or negligent. That's what really got her off the hook. She embraced her incompetence to avoid being guilty.

"Guys, I'm not guilty of a planned crime, I'm just a moron!"

Good defense. LOL
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
The Russian collusion hoax wasn't an "opinion". It was a straight up fabrication. This is how you cower behind people like this. Madcow straight up lies and then you claim "opinion" to hide behind after getting exposed.
Nope. It wasn’t a “hoax,” and it was an allegation/subject of investigation. And as I have shown you many times, it was a well-founded allegation. See Volume I of the Mueller report. Not a sentence fragment of your choosing. The whole volume.
 
Top