Democrat values (or lack thereof) and the strength of character, of those who serve in the miltary, are diametrically opposed.about 40% of our military are democrats...doctors, nurses, cops, EMTs...you think are all republicans?
Democrat values (or lack thereof) and the strength of character, of those who serve in the miltary, are diametrically opposed.about 40% of our military are democrats...doctors, nurses, cops, EMTs...you think are all republicans?
abolition was not a conservative position. The anti-slave republicans were called radicals.
Again...the south was mostly democrat, with only 11 republicans in congress in 1964...now there are over 100 republicans from those states. Where did all those racist democratic voters go? They switched sides...as did black voters in the south
The Democrats would not have passed that bill without the support of the Republican minority.dems passed the civil rights act in 1964. You think that was evil?
With a democrat as president and more democrats than republicans voting for it.The Democrats would not have passed that bill without the support of the Republican minority.
Southern Democrats opposed the bill and Senator KKK Byrd led a filibuster of the bill that was only broken with the votes of the Republicans who joined the Democrats. Many Democrats had to be browbeaten, coerced, and threatened by LBJ to get them to vote for the bill.
So, in answer to your question (where you once again demonstrate your woeful ignorance of history) the bill was passed with a bipartisan majority.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/CivilRightsAct1964.htm
The Democrats would not have passed that bill without the support of the Republican minority.
Southern Democrats opposed the bill and Senator KKK Byrd led a filibuster of the bill that was only broken with the votes of the Republicans who joined the Democrats. Many Democrats had to be browbeaten, coerced, and threatened by LBJ to get them to vote for the bill.
So, in answer to your question (where you once again demonstrate your woeful ignorance of history) the bill was passed with a bipartisan majority.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/CivilRightsAct1964.htm
Let me remind you that the republican party is the only one to have both the President and VP resign as part of a deal to avoid going to prison.You'll notice once again that Democrats have taken up the side of evil each and EVERY time. Republicans are always on the right side history. They were then and they are in. Got a cop you and your buddies can shoot in the back?
You said democrats are not Americans....so 40% of our military, according to you, are not true Americans....admit it Jack, that was a stupid thing to post.Democrat values (or lack thereof) and the strength of character, of those who serve in the miltary, are diametrically opposed.
"thin air"once again you post shit you've pulled out of thin air and tell other's to look for proof.
Wow...so in the first place...that there was slave trading in Kenya doesn't indicate Obama's family was involved. Your link offers nothing at all in the way of verifiable facts."thin air"
Obama’s Family Owned And Traded Slaves - News Punch
According to reports from the Baltimore Sun from 2007 relatives on Obama’s mothers side of the family owned and traded slaves, according to genealogical research and census records. Cnn.com reports: BYPASS THE CENSORS Sign up [...]newspunch.com
More half-truths.... the ONLY whites that were temporarily restricted from voting were some former officers and Confederate criminals. These people were traitors. White civilians were not denied the vote.You talk as if you know your history. ha ha After the war whites in the Confedrate states had no vote but blacks did and there were a great number of Republican blacks sent to DC.
As you've been shown to clearly not be a student of history either in the distant or even recent past your exhorting for creating a multi-generation insurgency is to be expected I guess.
How many Southern whites got a vote in congress immediately after the Civil War? You can't count carpet baggers (you know where that term comes from, right?).More half-truths.... the ONLY whites that were temporarily restricted from voting were some former officers and Confederate criminals. These people were traitors. White civilians were not denied the vote.
Reconstruction and Rights | Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861-1877 | U.S. History Primary Source Timeline | Classroom Materials at the Library of Congress | Library of Congress
When the Civil War ended, leaders turned to the question of how to reconstruct the nation. One important issue was the right to vote, and the rights of black American men and former Confederate men to vote were hotly debated.www.loc.gov
For the 4th time, the United States had, and has, a Democratic Party. Those traitors were not part of the United States. They left the party when they left the nation.Being a student of American history, I remember that one well. The Republicans forced the Democrats to give up their slaves.
Democrats are still angry about that today because the Republicans continue to take their slaves away from them.
Keep our foot on the necks of Black people. That belief.What "beliefs" might those be?
Cotton picked by slaves...they didn't want to pick it themselves.Cicil War was about COTTON not Slaves
They didn't have to thanks to the African Kings and Arabs that sold them SlavesCotton picked by slaves...they didn't want to pick it themselves.
Every single article of session mentions slavery and the right to retrieve runaway slaves...none mention cotton.
How many slaves did your great great granddady own.
White racists. What party they belonged to then is not the same as what they'd belong to now. That is evident by the number of republicans elected to congress from the former confederacy...and clearly the black population of the country agrees with me...and not you.They didn't have to thanks to the African Kings and Arabs that sold them Slaves
You ever seen cotton run?
None, he didn't grow cotton in Germany, how about yours?
All the cotton plantations were owned by white and black democrats.
So, the African Kings and Arabs were "white racist"! You were a RepublicanWhite racists. What party they belonged to then is not the same as what they'd belong to now. That is evident by the number of republicans elected to congress from the former confederacy...and clearly the black population of the country agrees with me...and not you.
Really? You think African kings and arabs were voters in the American south?So, the African Kings and Arabs were "white racist"! You were a Republican
As explained more than once...I worked on McCain's campaign in 2000 and found the Bush campaign disgusting and reprehensible for the rumors they spread about McCain...so I switched parties.So, the African Kings and Arabs were "white racist"! You were a Republican
I'm not surprised you worked on "songbirds" campaignAs explained more than once...I worked on McCain's campaign in 2000 and found the Bush campaign disgusting and reprehensible for the rumors they spread about McCain...so I switched parties.