Then your argument is with his employer, not this board. If he thinks he has a case he can sue, but he'll lose. Mississippi is a "right to work" state so he can be fired for any reason barring those falling under EEOC. Sadly for him, politics is not covered under EEOC.Again, he WAS NOT AT WORK or representing his employer.
Do tell us how you think the 1st amendment prevents you from being fired?When a poster cant help but get personal, they have no ability to debate, just throw insults.
I can just see all your chins jiggle when you do that LOL.Oooooooooooh, bring it girl! You go with your playground taunts!
LOL @ you.
@BobbyT has always had a crush on me that he expresses in a first-grader sort of way.Oh look, another key board coward disrespecting women...
I don't need to..................I'm sorry you don't know how to use Google, but you are the only one on this board (with the exception of any other Lefty who has its head in the sand) who doesn't know exactly what I am talking about...... sorry you are so low-information, but it's not my problem.Let me guess, you aren't "inclined" to offer any evidence of what you've asserted. You never are since you never actually have any evidence. And since you said "Anyone who is a Republican must hide it or get hurt," you're assertion is that those who don't hide it get hurt. I'd say get crackin' on finding that evidence but we both no you haven't got any.
Do tell us how your employer controls what you wear when not at work or representing your employer.Do tell us how you think the 1st amendment prevents you from being fired?
Do tell us how you think speech doesn't have consequences?
This is why self employment is good, so some liberal flake, fascist does not own you.Then your argument is with his employer, not this board. If he thinks he has a case he can sue, but he'll lose. Mississippi is a "right to work" state so he can be fired for any reason barring those falling under EEOC. Sadly for him, politics is not covered under EEOC.
Yes, of course you say you "don't need to." What you're really saying is you can't. You know it, I know it, everyone reading this thread knows it. It's your MO.I don't need to..................I'm sorry you don't know how to use Google, but you are the only one on this board (with the exception of any other Lefty who has its head in the sand) who doesn't know exactly what I am talking about...... sorry you are so low-information, but it's not my problem.
Well, the dude was fired. So I guess you already know how your employer controls what you wear when you're not at work.Do tell us how your employer controls what you wear when not at work or representing your employer.
It's "you're." As in "you're welcome."your an ass.
You could have just said "you're right, Bobby, thanks for the education."This is why self employment is good, so some liberal flake, fascist does not own you.
Embarrassing your employer is a recipe to get fired. This isn't new.Do tell us how your employer controls what you wear when not at work or representing your employer.
So he was also wearing clothing representing his employer? Or maybe surrounded by Madame Cleos?Embarrassing your employer is a recipe to get fired. This isn't new.
First you call me an ass, now you call me a Nazi. Typical rwnj incivility. Tsk.Oh, spelling Nazi, that's a tactic never before seen...View attachment 40765
I don't know why you think you need to be on the clock to embarrass your employer.So he was also wearing clothing representing his employer? Or maybe surrounded by Madame Cleos?
Here you are, speaking to a lady. Your postings below.First you call me an ass, now you call me a Nazi. Typical rwnj incivility. Tsk.
As an employer I'd try to talk a shooter down before firing him. ha haMississippi is a "right to work" state. No union protections. So his employer can fire him for any reason. You're not arguing that employers should be compelled to retain an employee they don't want, are you?