I read up on the color wheel, the way the signal was disassembled to reduce the broadband, went through the whole nine yards on that signal. When I tell you that it was 180,000 miles out of range, that is after giving it the benefit of the doubt for the work they did on it. The Clarke orbit is only 22,000 miles out. That's what NASA ordered equipment for. I'm giving that signal a range of 50,000 miles; that's over twice as far out as the Clarke orbit.
Do you know how Apollo 11 supposedly sent the footage of Armstrong climbing down the ladder? With a fixed two foot dish on the roof of the LEM. Think about how small a target the earth makes for that two foot dish. Unless that dish was aimed directly at the earth, even if it was just 2 degrees off in any direction, the signal was totally lost. Think about it. So wouldn't you think that the LEM would be built with an adjustable dish and that they would aim the dish at earth and test the signal before he stepped out the hatch? (If they were really on the moon and really trying to send a tv signal all the way to earth for the very first time).
Why did they bother to set up a six foot dish on the moon if the 2 foot dish was working perfect? BTW, those rover shots sure had great clarity without any equipment to tune the signal, it was a straight transmitter to dish hookup.
How exactly did that dish on the back of the rover manage to nail the earth perfectly with its signal even while the rover turned in circles? (Look at the dish, it is aimed at an angle)
stop. think. any of these points are impossible. the reason I only put a single point in the top post is because people read over multiple points and dismiss them all with a wave of a hand. Like you tried with the signal range. The earth is only 8000 miles in diameter. The dish on back of the rover was aiming all over the place in a grid roughly 300,000 miles in diameter; the signal that is out of range is not even aimed at the earth for any of the time it is attached to the rover. If the signal hit the earth by chance, it lasted one or two seconds and then was gone again. But we have these neat Apollo clips of full transmission from the back of the rover... none of the Apollo missions needed to ever aim a dish at the earth; the tv signal always was on target.
on and on it goes. It was a hoax.
What is the range on a low powered analog tv signal? (it hasn't changed) In broadcast mode, maybe a mile. Shot out of a five foot dish, maybe 50 miles. When I gave the LEM signal a range of 800 miles, that is assuming that the LEM had a power up amp... good luck confirming that, RCA built the equipment that went into the LEM and they went out of business before there was an internet. All of the television equipment was built for Apollo by the television industry. NASA just used what they bought on the open market. So, when you believe in the Apollo tv signal, you are believing that the same microwave analog signal that made hops of 15-35 miles back in the 1940's was able to leap to the earth from the moon. Did you know that the dish in Australia sent it over those old 8 foot dish hops across Australia? 8 foot dishes on those radio towers were larger than the dishes used on the moon, and the power of the signal was not low power as it was on the moon. In other words, the signal sent from the moon didn't go anywhere, our dishes on earth had to be able to go to the moon to get that signal... meaning they had to be half a mile in diameter, not 85 feet or that old 200 foot physics dish that they jury rigged for the Apollo signal.
When you read how they supposedly did it, bear in mind, it is a boondoggle, they are LYING and they are not believing their own Lies, they are pushing propaganda at you. Remember, this whole hoax was just that: propaganda from Dick Nixon. It wasn't just aimed at the American public, it was aimed at the Russians. Do you think Nixon believed for one moment that Apollo really went to the moon?
"The difference between us and the Russians is the Russians believe their Lies"
Richard Nixon