voyager
4Q2247365
Anybody that takes their medical advice from a politician is a full on retard.
trump has just strong armed the Indian Premier into sending 6 million doses of dr. trumps wonder drug to the US.
Anybody that takes their medical advice from a politician is a full on retard.
What are people whose doctors advise them to use the drug but can't because some politician says it is too risky to do?
Like in NY or Nevada where the medicine is available but the governors refuse to let pharmacies dispense it right now for example.
America can't make shit, because it won't pay american workers.trump has just strong armed the Indian Premier into sending 6 million doses of dr. trumps wonder drug to the US.
The hypothesis that it may be effective may come from (dangerous, to patients being treated and to others needing this drug) off-label use. But the evidence that it is in fact effective could only come from controlled clinical trials.of course, but then how are other uses discovered? you guessed it.. off label use.. cause effect.. trial error..
see: finasteride.
good luck.
Let him swallow some if he wants.The hypothesis that it may be effective may come from (dangerous, to patients being treated and to others needing this drug) off-label use. But the evidence that it is in fact effective could only come from controlled clinical trials.
yay. #ninamadeupshitnumber 3,456,444I know who/what you tout 24/7.
yes, which have occurred for hcq....just not for covid. (that is to say..the side effect profile is known up to a point.. yes trials are needed, but yes dr's can prescribe it for other purposes absent those.. all facts.The hypothesis that it may be effective may come from (dangerous, to patients being treated and to others needing this drug) off-label use. But the evidence that it is in fact effective could only come from controlled clinical trials.
so sonny, i do. severe AE reporting, clinical trials results submission to the fda, the whole works....After extensive double blinded clinical trials per each indication, yeah. Clearly you, like Don, have never worked in drug development research. I think you should go ahead and follow Don's every hunch. Don is right about one thing; I have nothing to lose by your following and swallowing.
no. it can come from controled clinical trials AND prescriber trial and error.The hypothesis that it may be effective may come from (dangerous, to patients being treated and to others needing this drug) off-label use. But the evidence that it is in fact effective could only come from controlled clinical trials.
There have been 4 very small-scale trials for hydroxychloroquine for COVId-19. 2 showed a very slight helpful effect for patients and 2 showed no effect.yes, which have occurred for hcq....just not for covid. (that is to say..the side effect profile is known up to a point.. yes trials are needed, but yes dr's can prescribe it for other purposes absent those.. all facts.
(which, for the dumber among us, is not an endorsement of trump. it is in fact, fact...)
What does “trial and error” mean without placebo controls, double-blind studies, or systematic comparisons? Anecdotal evidence.no. it can come from controled clinical trials AND prescriber trial and error.
See finasteride... and keytruda...
good luck...
very small, the first i believe was some 18 patients..but no combo therapyThere have been 4 very small-scale trials for hydroxychloroquine for COVId-19. 2 showed a very slight helpful effect for patients and 2 showed no effect.
it means dr's prescribe things, try things..What does “trial and error” mean without placebo controls, double-blind studies, or systematic comparisons? Anecdotal evidence.
And how do they distinguish drugs working from spontaneous remission? How do they quantify the efficacy of the drugs?it means dr's prescribe things, try things..
Why?And how do they distinguish drugs working from spontaneous remission? How do they quantify the efficacy of the drugs?
so sonny, i do. severe AE reporting, clinical trials results submission to the fda, the whole works....
but no, you tell everyone what you see,,,by making it up.
We have well established drug development studies protocols and procedures, none of which involve a consideration of "meh, what do you have to lose" from a wackass jackass who's earlier hunch was "it's just a hoax".Why?
By count of people recovering while on the drug... Maybe?
How does that matter if they don’t have controls to compare them to?Why?
By count of people recovering while on the drug... Maybe?
no, because it's new. did someone say it was finished...No one did studies on this compound for this indication. Tox data? Ok, at the dosages in those studies. Not finished by a long shot. Just a nice short cut on the tox studies if the dosages don't go higher for this indication.
Get fvcking real, you're clueless.
yeeeah....um, not quite, but yes. and noWe have well established drug development studies protocols and procedures, none of which involve a consideration of "meh, what do you have to lose" from a wackass jackass who's earlier hunch was "it's just a hoax".