New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Micky Mouse And Rob Rob Among 11,000 *Scientists* Who Signed Dire Climate Change Warning!

reason10

Mayor
Because my concern about climate change is about preventing mass starvation. While not allowing people to immigrate will mean more mass starvation, as well as perpetuating the capitalist system that is the main reason for individuals here having a high carbon footprint.
Edited

1. There is no climate change. Summers are still hot; winters are still cold; rain, snow, tornadoes, hurricanes all still occur.

2. The only starvation in the world is in countries where it is imposed upon them by their governments, and last time educated people checked, those were socialist/communist countries.

3. Capitalism is the only reason America has the highest standard of living, not only in the world but in all of history.


But by all means, feel free to leave here and go to some shithole communist country like Venezuela and live the dream. There are about a million starving people there who would take your place in a heartbeat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EatTheRich

President
Edited

1. There is no climate change. Summers are still hot; winters are still cold; rain, snow, tornadoes, hurricanes all still occur.

2. The only starvation in the world is in countries where it is imposed upon them by their governments, and last time educated people checked, those were socialist/communist countries.

3. Capitalism is the only reason America has the highest standard of living, not only in the world but in all of history.


But by all means, feel free to leave here and go to some shithole communist country like Venezuela and live the dream. There are about a million starving people there who would take your place in a heartbeat.
1. Summers, almost everywhere, are hotter. Winters, in much of the world, are warmer, but there is also more extreme cold in parts of North America and Europe. Rain and snow are more frequent overall but increasingly rare in parts of North America, Africa, and Australia. Tornadoes and hurricanes are less common but, when they do occur, more powerful. In other words, the climate has changed in precisely the ways the scientists said it would.
2. Starvation is most common in the capitalist world. India has the biggest population of starving people (it used to be China but their socialist revolution eliminated starvation there for decades).
3. The U.S.’s wealth is sustained by the poverty of people in other capitalist countries like India and Venezuela. Capitalism in the U.S. depends on capitalism in the colonial and semicolonial world.
 

EatTheRich

President
LIE.

"Blackless, Fausto-Sterling et al., said in two articles in 2000 that 1.7 percent of human births (1 in 60) might be intersex, including variations that may not become apparent until, for example, puberty, or until attempting to conceive."

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=percentage+of+intersex+births

"Might be" = you're full of crap. And "intersex" can males and females that simply cannot reproduce.

As usual, you post easily debunked LIES.
Your cut and paste SUPPORTS my assertion (which you called a lie).
 

EatTheRich

President
Translation: Yes, I concede political activists, er, scientists have been caught lying and manipulating data to achieve the desired results. If they get caught again, no big deal. They can just find another way to manipulate data to keep moving towards their goals.
That’s what your side does, since their goal is to reach a predetermined conclusion, not the truth. It is well established that AGW deniers have been caught deliberately falsifying and misrepresenting data over and over and over.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
That’s what your side does, since their goal is to reach a predetermined conclusion, not the truth. It is well established that AGW deniers have been caught deliberately falsifying and misrepresenting data over and over and over.
I guess you'll have to take that up with them.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Your cut and paste SUPPORTS my assertion (which you called a lie).
No, you're lying. Trying to equate an infertile woman with a mentally ill fool who thinks he's actually a woman is dishonest.
 

EatTheRich

President
No, you're lying. Trying to equate an infertile woman with a mentally ill fool who thinks he's actually a woman is dishonest.
An intersex person isn’t an “infertile woman.” They are someone who exposes the man/woman dichotomy as a childish oversimplification of the biological variation found in reality.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
An intersex person isn’t an “infertile woman.” They are someone who exposes the man/woman dichotomy as a childish oversimplification of the biological variation found in reality.
Doesn't really matter. It says 1 in 60 MAY BE intersex. Thus, that stat is meaningless garbage.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Because my concern about climate change is about preventing mass starvation. While not allowing people to immigrate will mean more mass starvation, as well as perpetuating the capitalist system that is the main reason for individuals here having a high carbon footprint.
So if I understand you correctly here, you support unlimited immigration only so it leads to implementation of a communist future for America where everyone is poor? That's precisely what I thought and thanks for being so up front about it.
 

Boca

Governor
Yep, liberals got suckered again. It's because they're DUMB.

So 11,000 *scientists* have issued a dire warning about climate change. Among the signatories:

Micky Mouse
Rob Rob
A pensioner in Nambia
gynecologists
mathematicians
psychologists
a "Sahar".... whatever that is
veterinarians

After nonsense like this, dozens of wrong predictions, multiple instances of lying, data manipulation and coercion, you leftists wonder why we normal Americans don't take you seriously?

Seriously?
Not to mention some other occupations.....

Animal Behaviorist
Professor of Psychology and Business
Adjunt Professor/Evolution & Botany (Can't spell)
Accaunt and Finance Phd. (Ditto)
Zoo keeper
Food Safety/Veterinary Epidemiology
Assoc Prof in Physics
MD
Food Studies
Lecturer in Socal Work
Professor of Genetics
Neuroscience
Professor of Zoology
Professor of Intensive Care Medicine
PhD Geography

Mickey Mouse is a Professor at the Mickey Mouse Institute for the Blind

Maybe we could get PJ Headquarters to establish a tuition free Donald Duck Institute for Dummies
 

Boca

Governor
Because my concern about climate change is about preventing mass starvation.
Uhh...question, how many additional millions of agricultural acres might result from a 1.7 centigrade temperature increase globally.

I sure as hell don't know but you never thought about it.
 

EatTheRich

President
So if I understand you correctly here, you support unlimited immigration only so it leads to implementation of a communist future for America where everyone is poor? That's precisely what I thought and thanks for being so up front about it.
No, I support immigration regulated by the market, not by a giant nanny state, because it strengthens the masses, hastening the realization of a communist world where social class doesn’t determine whether people eat.
 

EatTheRich

President
Uhh...question, how many additional millions of agricultural acres might result from a 1.7 centigrade temperature increase globally.

I sure as hell don't know but you never thought about it.
Already discussed, and it’s complicated. More to the point, why should that number matter when we are deciding between policies that will ... if we are lucky ... cap temperature rise (and attendant local drought, torrential rainfall, or explosions in the carrying capacity of pests and competing weeds) at 2.0 degrees, and policies that will result in a rise of 3.5 degrees or more?
 

Boca

Governor
Already discussed, and it’s complicated. More to the point, why should that number matter when we are deciding between policies that will ... if we are lucky ... cap temperature rise (and attendant local drought, torrential rainfall, or explosions in the carrying capacity of pests and competing weeds) at 2.0 degrees, and policies that will result in a rise of 3.5 degrees or more?
In the last 140 years average global temps have risen 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Is that so dire as to have countries destroy their standard of living now? No fuel for farming? People dieing of starvation and lack of air conditioning? Freezing to death for lack of heating oil or natural gas. Economic depression as factories and businesses dependent on energy become inefficient and close down.

Particularly when scientists the world over can't agree?

Sounds a lot like religion doesn't it?
 

EatTheRich

President
In the last 140 years average global temps have risen 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Is that so dire as to have countries destroy their standard of living now? No fuel for farming? People dieing of starvation and lack of air conditioning? Freezing to death for lack of heating oil or natural gas. Economic depression as factories and businesses dependent on energy become inefficient and close down.

Particularly when scientists the world over can't agree?

Sounds a lot like religion doesn't it?
The level of disagreement among scientists is much less than you like to pretend. Oil and coal are already uneconomical and have to be subsidized heavily to compete with nuclear and wind. And the economic costs of the relatively modest warming experienced so far already dwarfs the costs of mitigation efforts.
 

Boca

Governor
The level of disagreement among scientists is much less than you like to pretend. Oil and coal are already uneconomical and have to be subsidized heavily to compete with nuclear and wind. And the economic costs of the relatively modest warming experienced so far already dwarfs the costs of mitigation efforts.
I give up. You are forever making assertions and never anything that backs them up.

In this post 5. I've got better things to do.
 

EatTheRich

President
I give up. You are forever making assertions and never anything that backs them up.

In this post 5. I've got better things to do.
I am asserting things that are common knowledge among anyone who has investigated the matter at all. If you were intellectually responsible and looked at the facts before making an ideological judgment, you would already be aware of the truth of my assertions ... which, as always, I can support (but should not have to track down references every time I assert something that is part of the ABCs of informed discourse on the subject).
https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/
https://www.mintpressnews.com/report-without-taxpayer-subsidies-fossil-fuel-companies-would-fail/232827/
 
Top