Discussion in 'Latest Political News and Current Events' started by Spamature, Aug 9, 2019.
So Mueller was “in on it”?
A) Mueller isn't a Democratic Party member.
B) It looks like he purposely stayed out of it and decided from the start that it was really the job of congress to investigate.
He decided he was not going to play word games and let the report stand.
But his testimony is that collusion and conspiracy are not the same thing. Collusion can be legal and wrong. Conspiracy is a crime that has specific legal standards that need to be met. He says his investigation could not find enough evidence on conspiracy to meet those standards. But that does not mean there was not evidence of both collusion and conspiracy.
Again, you can pretend he meant something different than what he said, but he said he stood by his report, and in the report it specifically states that the terms are interchangeable.
You really are grasping at straws.
w/a gang of prog lawyers doing his job
But they are not and were not for the purpose of this investigation.
Mueller was looking for crimes under the law.
Collusion is not a crime under the law.
The report said they were and Mueller backed that up.
A bunch of Republican lawyers worked on the Clinton investigation. Pugs like Brett Kavanaugh, who we all know as a rule bending, rule breaking, liar.
You saw him argue against the assertion. You saw him do that for most of the video. Yet you want to ignore it and concentrate on the word games that GOPer was playing.
You are grasping at straws and you know it.
You know what? Whatever....
You can believe what you want to. I really don't care. If it would make you feel better to want so badly for the president to be colluding with Russia, then feel free to believe it. I'm not a fascist leftie, so you can believe whatever you want. These circular arguments aren't worth my time.
Conspiracy is, and he found none.
What page of the report is that on?
Cut and paste, and cite the page.
damn, derailing your own bs...…
I didn't want him to do it. But I am not going to ignore that he did.
Read the report where he defines conspiracy.
That's why I successfully called you out on your lie.
Then you shouldn't have any questions about what I said. It's right there on the page.
And yet you can’t quote it.
What a maroon.
I say..........go for the impeachment.
It oughta sew things right up for Trump in 2020.
Even though after 3 investigations it shows he didn't? You want him to have done it so badly that it's driving you nuts. In fact, I don't even think you care that he did or didn't do it, you just want him gone and you'll cling to any excuse to get rid of him. You people really are turning us into a 3rd world banana republic
Separate names with a comma.