New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

New study says Yes Russia's attack on the US did help Trump win.

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
How much did AQ spend on the 9/11 attack ? Are you going to claim the effectiveness of that attack compared to what we were spending on anti terrorist measures were not just as if not much, much, more lopsided ?

The fact is that vulnerability among Republicans preconditioned to by right wing media propaganda made the success of their attack much easier. After all the right wing media has spent billions over the years to turn you into the very kinds of chumps and suckers that would fall for Russian propaganda.
Damn, derailed your own Russian thread!
 

Spamature

President
Actually, you're citing an accusation, likely from the very same indictment Mueller immediately began backpedaling and stalling once counsel showed up to demand a speedy trial.

Still, I'm very generous with you since you're not very bright. So let's assume you're correct. $1.25 million X 18 months. That comes out to $2.25 million. Divide that by the $1 billion spent on behalf of Cankles Inc. That comes out to 2.25% or 1/50 of what was spent on Cankles' behalf.

You're still in the hole. At least now you're just six feet under instead of thirty. Keep trying, you're fun to watch:

View attachment 43574
Your jabbing about speedy trials does nothing to counter the facts about funding.

Now if you have some fact I suggest you post them. Especially since you LIE about funding has been debunked.

So put on some fact for once instead of your usual faux victory dance.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Your jabbing about speedy trials does nothing to counter the facts about funding.

Now if you have some fact I suggest you post them. Especially since you LIE about funding has been debunked.

So put on some fact for once instead of your usual faux victory dance.
You've debunked nothing. If the budget you cited, along wit the rest of the *facts* in Mueller's indictment were true, he wouldn't be stalling the trial.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Your jabbing about speedy trials does nothing to counter the facts about funding.

Now if you have some fact I suggest you post them. Especially since you LIE about funding has been debunked.

So put on some fact for once instead of your usual faux victory dance.
dumb to call him a Liar while you've Lied so many time in the thread
 

Spamature

President
You've debunked nothing. If the budget you cited, along wit the rest of the *facts* in Mueller's indictment were true, he wouldn't be stalling the trial.
You're just repeating more Russian troll farm propaganda like a good little soldier.

All of the Russian individuals charged so far in connection to the interference operation have declined to answer the accusations in court and are believed to be safely in Russia, outside the reach of U.S. law enforcement.

They aren't here to put on trial and any further action would be up to Trump's DOJ.
And as we know Trump is extremely afraid of Putin and will back down to him on this issue in the future just as he has done in the past and is doing right now.
 

Spamature

President
As she never tells the truth do not expect anything that is intelligent.
He whined about 3 million votes being a lie because the real number is about 135k less, when voter suppression in his state alone probably amounts to more than 135k black voters denied their right to vote.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
As she never tells the truth do not expect anything that is intelligent.
sexism from poop on the street
or do you call all the males "she" when you grab their package!
probably do since your in San Fran!
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
He whined about 3 million votes being a lie because the real number is about 135k less, when voter suppression in his state alone probably amounts to more than 135k black voters denied their right to vote.
So now you admit you LIED and throw in a "probably"----Prove It______go
 

Spamature

President
So now you admit you LIED and throw in a "probably"----Prove It______go
Here is evidence that I am correct.

First, the ban on early voting hit Democrats more than Republicans: In 2012, 48 percent of North Carolina’s early voters were registered Democrats and 32 percent were registered Republicans, an edge of 140,000 Democratic voters. The restrictions in the 17 affected counties are sure to have a similar impact.

Second, voter-ID laws hit people of color disproportionately. The American Civil Liberties Union estimates that 25 percent of black Americans lack a government-issued photo ID, compared to just 8 percent of whites. Low-income and elderly voters are also disproportionately affected.

By way of comparison, Barack Obama won the state by 15,000 votes in 2008, and Mitt Romney won by 117,000 in 2012
.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/north-carolina-gop-brags-racist-voter-suppression-is-workingand-theyre-right

That is a swing of 132000 votes in favor of the Republicans after voter suppression laws were put in place.

MAGA !
 
Top