1. Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?
    Dismiss Notice

News I Never Heard....how about you?

Discussion in 'Latest Political News and Current Events' started by Boca, Jun 17, 2019.

  1. Boca

    Boca Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    12,595
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    https://consortiumnews.com/in-case-you-missed-these-stories/

    FBI Never Saw CrowdStrike Unredacted or Final Report on Alleged Russian Hacking Because None was Produced

    Thousands of emails from the DNC server were published by WikiLeaks in July 2016 revealing that the DNC interfered in the Democratic primary process to favor former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over Senator Bernie Sanders for the party’s presidential nomination. The U.S. indicted 12 Russian military intelligence agents in 2018 for allegedly hacking the DNC server and giving the emails to WikiLeaks.

    Comey Can’t Say Why

    At a time of high tension in the 2016 presidential campaign, when the late Sen. John McCain and others were calling Russian “hacking” an “act of war,” the FBI settled for three redacted “draft reports” from CrowdStrike rather than investigate the alleged hacking itself, the court document shows.

    Then FBI Director James Comey admitted in congressional testimony that he chose not to take control of the DNC’s “hacked” computers, and did not dispatch FBI computer experts to inspect them, but has had trouble explaining why.
    It comes as no surprise disgraced former FBI Director was in the tank for Hillary Clinton and didn't want to happen on any evidence of criminal activity. What's new is that the phony "Russia did it" meme was in the works early on.

    There's much more in the article to include the FBI never asking for a final report from Crowdstrike, nor even the redacted draft reports. These drafts were “voluntarily” given to the FBI by DNC lawyers.

    There's another interesting piece of information regarding the DNC hacking......

    Bill Binney, a former NSA technical director and a VIPS member, filed an affidavit in Stone’s case. Binney said: “WikiLeaks did not receive stolen data from the Russian government. Intrinsic metadata in the publicly available files on WikiLeaks demonstrates that the files acquired by WikiLeaks were delivered in a medium such as a thumb drive.”
    And guess what....

    FBI Not Probing DNC Staffer Seth Rich's Murder, Despite WikiLeaks Claim

     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Disagree x 1
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2019
  2. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    Because it was a bs cover for Assange getting hacked DNC emails from the Russians.

    That's why.
     
    • Dislike x 1
    • Agree x 1
    • Disagree x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Winner x 1
  3. Boca

    Boca Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    12,595
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Obviously you didn't read the whole article. Or you did and are just spewing again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Disagree x 2
  4. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    They caught the Russians and traced Guccifer 2.0 ip back to the GRU.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  5. Boca

    Boca Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    12,595
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    So, you're contending that Guccifer boarded a plane halfway around the world, then gained entrance to the US on some sort of visa and then to DNC headquarters after hours with a thumb drive?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  6. Constitutional Sheepdog

    Constitutional Sheepdog ][][][%er!!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    48,934
    Likes Received:
    7,588
    Bull shit this is old news way back in 2016 are you calling Comey a liar?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    No. It was always the GRU (Russian Military Intelligence) Guccifer 2.0 never existed. It was a fiction made up as a cover for their activities. There was no physical break in (like the GOP did under Nixon) as far as has been reported. It was an electronic break in.
     
    • Disagree x 1
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2019
  8. llovejim

    llovejim Current Champion

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2019
    Messages:
    5,777
    Likes Received:
    628
    QUOTE="Boca, post: 2453680, member: 8379"]https://consortiumnews.com/in-case-you-missed-these-stories/

    FBI Never Saw CrowdStrike Unredacted or Final Report on Alleged Russian Hacking Because None was Produced

    Thousands of emails from the DNC server were published by WikiLeaks in July 2016 revealing that the DNC interfered in the Democratic primary process to favor former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over Senator Bernie Sanders for the party’s presidential nomination. The U.S. indicted 12 Russian military intelligence agents in 2018 for allegedly hacking the DNC server and giving the emails to WikiLeaks. (that is total bullshit. no need to help hillary, only a goddamn fool would say that when she got 3 million more popular votes during the primaries and beat crybaby sanders by 15 primary elections. no need to cheat when you kick somebody's ass that bad. why are trump voters stupid and gullible?)

    Comey Can’t Say Why

    At a time of high tension in the 2016 presidential campaign, when the late Sen. John McCain and others were calling Russian “hacking” an “act of war,” the FBI settled for three redacted “draft reports” from CrowdStrike rather than investigate the alleged hacking itself, the court document shows.

    Then FBI Director James Comey admitted in congressional testimony that he chose not to take control of the DNC’s “hacked” computers, and did not dispatch FBI computer experts to inspect them, but has had trouble explaining why.
    (not sure that is true, but even if it is, so what? FBI experts made the call about Russian hackers and the private email servers they targeted that were political, not classified or security related to the country...why should the government confiscate them? ever try to think, much? )
    It comes as no surprise disgraced former FBI Director was in the tank for Hillary Clinton and didn't want to happen on any evidence of criminal activity. What's new is that the phony "Russia did it" meme was in the works early on. (how was he in the tank when he publicized her being under investigation twice, including once 10 days before the election, while not admitting trump was also under investigation!! why are you so gullible and low info? besides, comey admitted finally there were no classified emails on hillary's server. all hyped up bullshit.)

    There's much more in the article to include the FBI never asking for a final report from Crowdstrike, nor even the redacted draft reports. These drafts were “voluntarily” given to the FBI by DNC lawyers. (we indicted 12 russians, confused silly person. what does crowdstrike have to do with that? you are just spewing lies and useless rumors and bullshit. as usual.)

    There's another interesting piece of information regarding the DNC hacking......

    Bill Binney, a former NSA technical director and a VIPS member, filed an affidavit in Stone’s case. Binney said: “WikiLeaks did not receive stolen data from the Russian government. Intrinsic metadata in the publicly available files on WikiLeaks demonstrates that the files acquired by WikiLeaks were delivered in a medium such as a thumb drive.” (who gives a shit what he says? read the mueller report, home-school. screw that clown, whoever he is.)
    And guess what....

    FBI Not Probing DNC Staffer Seth Rich's Murder, Despite WikiLeaks Claim (only idiots are still spewing that bullshit. why not go ahead and claim Obama was born in Kenya, too, and that Hillary had a porno ring in a NYC pizza joint. good god..)

    [/QUOTE]

    why aliens won't talk to us.
     
    • Disagree x 2
  9. The facts support an inside job, not the nefarious Russians you seem to see hiding behind every tree.

    Boo!
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    There you go. Back to the fake news from Facebook. Some people never learn. Even Fox News has apologized for promoting this lie. But you are squarely on the side of Trump and Putin. You prove useful idiots are the most loyal pawns.
     
    • Disagree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. Let me guess... 17 intel agencies all say it was the Russians, right?

    ROFLMAO!!!
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  12. FakeName

    FakeName Mayor

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2019
    Messages:
    6,226
    Likes Received:
    303
    The Fact that the Russians were behind it is an established fact and not in doubt.

    Come back to the real world.
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    The Mueller report you love to prance around holding up says so.
     
    • Disagree x 2
  14. Boca

    Boca Governor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    12,595
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    So the Technical Director of the National Security Agency doesn't know shit about what he testified to before Congress.

    Thanks. Didn't know that either.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Disagree x 1
  15. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    Former Technical Director of the National Security Agency under the Bush admin, who was not directly involved in the investigation.

    So yeah, he wasn't involved in the investigation and therefore his testimony is speculation.
    They should ask him what he has to say about Saddam Nukes ? He was there for that wasn't he ?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree x 1
  16. If that's true, why did Mueller stall when the indicted Russians demanded a speedy trial?
     
    • Disagree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    Link to the Russian intelligence officers coming here and demanding a trial ?
     
    • Disagree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. Link to me saying they did?

    Besides, as you know, their legal counsel showed up and demanded a speedy trial.
     
    • Disagree x 1
  19. Spamature

    Spamature President

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    63,505
    Likes Received:
    4,530
    Link ?
     
    • Disagree x 1
  20. FakeName

    FakeName Mayor

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2019
    Messages:
    6,226
    Likes Received:
    303
    National security.

    They would have had a right to discovery, which would give the russians sources and methods.

    Duh!

    Do you live under a rock?

    How is it you dont already know this stuff?
     
    • Disagree x 1

Share This Page