redtide
Mayor
so in other words all you have is what about Barry? now that is sadWhat is relevant is the lesson to be learned by the campaign of hate waged by the republicans over 8 years.
so in other words all you have is what about Barry? now that is sadWhat is relevant is the lesson to be learned by the campaign of hate waged by the republicans over 8 years.
Some examples...there are many dozens...I disagree. How did Kavanaugh "perjure" himself?
do you have anything that does not come from left wing hate media?Some examples...there are many dozens...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-fact-check.html?rref=collection/issuecollection/todays-new-york-times&action=click&contentCollection=todayspaper®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/9/24/17893134/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-dishonest
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/28/lynne-brookes-kavanaugh-classmate-cuomo-cpt-intv-vpx-bts.cnn
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/09/26/mark-judges-girlfriend-is-ready-to-talk-to-fbi-and-judiciary-committee-her-lawyer-says/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/boofing-ralphing-doubts-kavanaughs-testimony-155802115.html
https://www.firstcoastnews.com/mobile/article/news/twitter-users-definition-of-boofed-and-devils-triangle-dont-match-brett-kavanaughs/77-599127490
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/brett-kavanaugh-roommate-sexual-misconduct-1136989?amp=1
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/26/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-told-four-people-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/
Translation: I’m going with the ostrich approach here. If Sean Hannity tells me Kavanaugh lies under oath, I’ll listen.do you have anything that does not come from left wing hate media?
The probe will not be thorough for demo.craps, but it will be thorough for republicans.Being limited to a week does, of course, place heavy constraints on the FBI, and that’s by design.
But how about the scope? It’s limited to “current credible allegations.” Who decides which allegations are credible? And what if the probe turns up new damning information? Is that off limits because it’s not “current”? Most importantly, will the FBI officials do their best within their very limited time while knowing that Trump wants them to find nothing and help with the whitewash?
We shall see...
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/28/652558787/what-difference-would-it-make-if-the-fbi-were-to-investigate-kavanaugh
OK, a bunch of links that don't support your assertions is basically a bunch of links.Some examples...there are many dozens...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-fact-check.html?rref=collection/issuecollection/todays-new-york-times&action=click&contentCollection=todayspaper®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/policy-and-politics/2018/9/24/17893134/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-dishonest
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/28/lynne-brookes-kavanaugh-classmate-cuomo-cpt-intv-vpx-bts.cnn
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/09/26/mark-judges-girlfriend-is-ready-to-talk-to-fbi-and-judiciary-committee-her-lawyer-says/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/boofing-ralphing-doubts-kavanaughs-testimony-155802115.html
https://www.firstcoastnews.com/mobile/article/news/twitter-users-definition-of-boofed-and-devils-triangle-dont-match-brett-kavanaughs/77-599127490
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/brett-kavanaugh-roommate-sexual-misconduct-1136989?amp=1
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/26/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-told-four-people-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/
Why don't YOU tell us? You are the one saying he perjured himself, thus far it's a nada-enchilada.Translation: I’m going with the ostrich approach here. If Sean Hannity tells me Kavanaugh lies under oath, I’ll listen.
;-)
Of course it’s enough for Republicans (at least the Trump rabble variety). You support the Trump/GOP whitewashes, and you don’t care if your cult puts a perjurer on the SCOTUS.The probe will not be thorough for demo.craps, but it will be thorough for republicans.
Any more questions?
Just one.
Bugsy, do you have an outhouse under the bridge where you live, or do you just poop on the concrete?
It doesn't matter where it comes from, but so far, nothing I've seen supports a case for perjury against Kavanaugh.do you have anything that does not come from left wing hate media?
Eight links chock full of false statements Kavanaugh made under oath. You just ignore them. You challenge none of them.OK, a bunch of links that don't support your assertions is basically a bunch of links.
i'm actually hoping for a more liberal SCOTUS, just not through smear tactics.Of course it’s enough for Republicans (at least the Trump rabble variety). You support the Trump/GOP whitewashes, and you don’t care if your cult puts a perjurer on the SCOTUS.
Right?
you pick the best one and I promise you I'll blow holes in it.Eight links chock full of false statements Kavanaugh made under oath. You just ignore them. You challenge none of them.
You should at least be honest enough to admit you don’t care if the GOP cult puts a perjurer on the SCOTUS.
They are only “smear tactics” if you conclude that Ford is lying and you ignore the countless instances of Kavanaugh lying under oath, not to mention his hyper-partisan tirade, his belligerence during the hearing, his complete lack of judicial temperament, etc.i'm actually hoping for a more liberal SCOTUS, just not through smear tactics.
Are you going to answer my challenge?They are only “smear tactics” if you conclude that Ford is lying and you ignore the countless instances of Kavanaugh lying under oath, not to mention his hyper-partisan tirade, his belligerence during the hearing, his complete lack of judicial temperament, etc.
That’s a very strange way of “hoping for a more liberal SCOTUS.”
What evidence of FBI wrongdoing are you alleging?Of course it’s enough for Republicans (at least the Trump rabble variety). You support the Trump/GOP whitewashes, and you don’t care if your cult puts a perjurer on the SCOTUS.
Right?
They are all equally strong, but I’ll give you one to work with...you pick the best one and I promise you I'll blow holes in it.
go ahead. pick one and stick to it. no switching gears, get the best one.