New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Normal people await the impeachment trial

you left out a category...

Those that feel it is possible that Trump did indeed commit an act unbecoming of the office of the President, but that said act does not rise anywhere near the level of 'high crimes and misdemeanors' required to remove a President from office.
A blow job however does.
 
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath in a Federal Court and witness tampering. He conceded that he was guilty of that and the US Senate decided that it did not warrant him being removed from office.
Clinton was impeached for what again?

And Don doesn't/hasn't lied?

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .......................
 

Colorforms

Senator
Refuge in semantics and gaslighting is so american.
"Articles referred to Senate[edit]
Article I, charging Clinton with perjury, alleged in part that:

On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following:

  1. the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate government employee;
  2. prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a federal civil rights action brought against him;
  3. prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a federal judge in that civil rights action; and
  4. his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.[33][34]
Article II, charging Clinton with obstruction of justice alleged in part that:

The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:

  1. ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.
  2. ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.
  3. ... corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.
  4. ... intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.
  5. ... at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.
  6. ... related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.
  7. ... made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.[33][35]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
If you can find the word "blowjob" anywhere in there, I'll buy you a cookie :)
 
"Articles referred to Senate[edit]
Article I, charging Clinton with perjury, alleged in part that:

On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following:

  1. the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate government employee;
  2. prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a federal civil rights action brought against him;
  3. prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a federal judge in that civil rights action; and
  4. his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.[33][34]
Article II, charging Clinton with obstruction of justice alleged in part that:

The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:

  1. ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.
  2. ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.
  3. ... corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.
  4. ... intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.
  5. ... at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.
  6. ... related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.
  7. ... made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.[33][35]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
If you can find the word "blowjob" anywhere in there, I'll buy you a cookie :)

I was around, thanks.
 

Jack4freedom

Governor
you left out a category...

Those that feel it is possible that Trump did indeed commit an act unbecoming of the office of the President, but that said act does not rise anywhere near the level of 'high crimes and misdemeanors' required to remove a President from office.
That is covered in category 4 in my post. However that would require a full accounting of exactly what Trump and his cohorts did. That also would require an admission by Trump and his associates that what they did was wrong and unbecoming of a US President. Trump, his cohorts and their staunch supporters in congress and the press are shifting the blame for these actions, accusations and findings to those who dare to investigate him. To leave it at that and claim total exoneration like they did regarding the Mueller report would send a very destructive message to future occupants of the White House in my opinion.
 
That is covered in category 4 in my post. However that would require a full accounting of exactly what Trump and his cohorts did. That also would require an admission by Trump and his associates that what they did was wrong and unbecoming of a US President. Trump, his cohorts and their staunch supporters in congress and the press are shifting the blame for these actions, accusations and findings to those who dare to investigate him. To leave it at that and claim total exoneration like they did regarding the Mueller report would send a very destructive message to future occupants of the White House in my opinion.
Oh they got the message.
 
Top