New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Obama Taking FOURTEEN Teleprompters On Trip To London.... LOL

  • Thread starter Deleted member 21794
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Since your post shows you've bought the top post, hook line and sinker...as if Obama is acting in a manner unique to him and that you'd have criticized the behavior if it ever happened in a republican administration. The fact is that democrats did not criticize Bush for the size of his travel entourage...and neither did you....making you a hypocrite now.
Bush Bush Bush Bush Bush.... so basically your defense is Obama is just like Bush.

Okey dokey.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Running away from your Navy accusation? I don't blame you, you clearly lied. Even better, you were dumb enough to prove it for me.

ROFLMAO!
Look up the word hyperbole....meanwhile where is your evidence that Obama has a secret gay lover?
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
No, that's silly. You're the one obsessing over a president that's been out of office for nearly seven years, not me.
Well since you're the one who made the top post, obsessing about something Obama did 6 yrs ago, thinking it was today's news, you're the one who should be embarrassed. And you CONS are always obsessing about Bill Clinton and look how long he has been out of office.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Well since you're the one who made the top post, obsessing about something Obama did 6 yrs ago, thinking it was today's news, you're the one who should be embarrassed. And you CONS are always obsessing about Bill Clinton and look how long he has been out of office.
Huh? Obsessing? I simply made an observation. And it's still funny as hell- FOURTEEN TELEPROMPTERS! Now point me to these posts about Bill Clinton I've made.

Didn't think so. You lose.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Basketball partner = secret gay lover
Do you have any evidence as to your accusation? If not it is a lie.
Apparently you do not even understand what a lie is. My my how far you've devolved as a partisan hack. What a shame.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Look up the word hyperbole....meanwhile where is your evidence that Obama has a secret gay lover?
Cool.... you've backed way back from your half the Navy accusation, your funny excuse notwithstanding.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Because, whereas Jimmy Carter and Harry S. Truman were good and honorable men, Barack Obama is demonstrably a sociopath.

The chief symptom of his disease is his pathological dishonesty.
The man cannot even comprehend the concept of the 'truth' or 'a lie'.
He lies immediately and reflexively.
It does not matter if it true or not, it only matters that he wants it to be true, and then it becomes true for him.
And then he is dumbfounded and angry when you don't get it that this is how it must be.
He's not a complete or properly-functioning human being, in those regards.

A sociopath doesn't feel human empathy, nor does he comprehend human emotions.
He merely mimics them.
In Obama's case, nearly expertly.

A man like Obama doesn't even comprehend the notion of the needs and requirements of others. He only knows his own pleasure. His own largesse, his own ego, his own legacy.

Obama doesn't act upon impulses related to the good of the nation or the overall well-being of a society. He acts upon his need for approval and adoration. And the satisfaction of his own urges.

A sociopath woos.
He charms.
He seduces gullible people.
In Obama's case, he seduces gullible voters and campaign contributors.
All in order to get his way.

I have studied human psychology my whole life, and I must sadly report that I suffered in the household (growing up in the 1960's and early 1970's) of a similar pathological liar and self-indulgent creature. My own father. And in all my travels around the globe over the years since, I have met only three other such creatures in my entire life.

Devoid of true human emotion or empathy (but capable of mimicking it quite well).
Pathologically-dishonest. Unable to even understand what the truth even is, let alone able to tell it.
Self-absorbed, and able to charm and manipulate those who are willing to fall for the charming facade.

I wish I didn't have this perspective.
I would love to be oblivious and clueless, like so many other taxpayers.
I hate that I have this personal knowledge and life experience.

I hate that I can see in Obama what so many of you are blind to.

And I really hate that he is your President.

:mad:
I'm not surprised @LeRoyWasHere has abandoned responding to you. You've left pretty much zero wiggle room. Even he knows when to crawl back under his rock.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Did you criticize Bush for traveling with 5?
Five doctors is silly as well. I hereby criticize Bush or any politician for traveling with more than two. I'm allotting two in case they need some sort of specialist. Anything more is silly.

See how easy that is?
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
That would be hyperbole....half the navy vs a fleet of 34 warships isn't the issue...it is that Fox news printed false info and isnt credible and neither are you.

Basketball partner = secret gay lover

That would be a lie, unless you have evidence.
Subject change = you know you lied. You said you don't post things that aren't true. Clearly you did. And now you make nothing but excuses. So sad, Mr. Standards.
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Yet another person pointing out that you're a hypocrite and you don't really have a defense...so you resort to a deflection.
You talking about deflection? Hilarious, Mr. IBlameBushForEverything. And you talk about others being a hypocrite?

LOL
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You talking about deflection? Hilarious, Mr. IBlameBushForEverything. And you talk about others being a hypocrite?

LOL
I didn't blame Bush for anything.....Very clearly I said the traveling entourage was the same then as it is today. I didn't complain about Bush's travel expense and don't complain about Obama's. You complain about Obama's, but didn't complain about Bush's....

That makes you a hypocrite.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Subject change = you know you lied. You said you don't post things that aren't true. Clearly you did. And now you make nothing but excuses. So sad, Mr. Standards.
Basketball partner = secret gay lover That would be a lie, unless you have evidence.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
That does not strike me as a defense of Obama. You see...it's a defense of the office of The President Of The United States. I understand the right believes Obama still a community organizer, but that is incorrect.
"That does not strike me as a defense of Obama."

It does to me.
Why else state, "you only want to talk about how many people travel with Obama...."?

"You see...it's a defense of the office of The President Of The United States. I understand the right believes Obama still a community organizer, but that is incorrect."

Which would mean that what I presented to you, even IF you want to believe is merely "a defense of the office of The President Of The United States", is still a defense of obummer being I understand that as the President he represents this office.
 

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
"That does not strike me as a defense of Obama."

It does to me.
Why else state, "you only want to talk about how many people travel with Obama...."?

"You see...it's a defense of the office of The President Of The United States. I understand the right believes Obama still a community organizer, but that is incorrect."

Which would mean that what I presented to you, even IF you want to believe is merely "a defense of the office of The President Of The United States", is still a defense of obummer being I understand that as the President he represents this office.
Elsewhere in this thread, I posted the entourages of 4 different Presidents, Obama, Bush, Clinton, and Reagan. There is absolutely nothing unusual about the size of the entourage. There is no defense of Obama whatsoever...but there is an attack on Obama. The reason is: He is President and you...and the absurdly named Thinker, simply don't like it, for whatever reason, so you bring up 6 year old tales that do nothing but attack the man for being President and doing what all Presidents in your lifetime have done with nary a frickin peep about the size of their entourage.

Yes...President Obama is President. Very good.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Elsewhere in this thread, I posted the entourages of 4 different Presidents, Obama, Bush, Clinton, and Reagan. There is absolutely nothing unusual about the size of the entourage. There is no defense of Obama whatsoever...but there is an attack on Obama. The reason is: He is President and you...and the absurdly named Thinker, simply don't like it, for whatever reason, so you bring up 6 year old tales that do nothing but attack the man for being President and doing what all Presidents in your lifetime have done with nary a frickin peep about the size of their entourage.

Yes...President Obama is President. Very good.
My poor little misguided liberal friend.................

When you find yourself talking about people such as myself who most assuredly have not been involved in any sort of "attack" of your precious obami and claiming the reason for this entirely imagined "attack" is because he is President and I...and another "simply don't like it, for whatever reason", sadly for YOU, that constitutes nothing BUT a defense of Obama.

It's ok, he is your idol and defending one's idol is completely natural when an attack is perceived, be it real or as in this case, merely imagined. I get that but just come right out and state it, stop trying to come across as if you defend all presidents equally.

I don', you don't, and everyone out here knows better.
 

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
My poor little misguided liberal friend.................

When you find yourself talking about people such as myself who most assuredly have not been involved in any sort of "attack" of your precious obami and claiming the reason for this entirely imagined "attack" is because he is President and I...and another "simply don't like it, for whatever reason", sadly for YOU, that constitutes nothing BUT a defense of obummer.

It's ok, he is your idol and defending one's idol is completely natural when an attack is perceived, be it real or as in this case, merely imagined. I get that but just come right out and state it, stop trying to come across as if you defend all presidents equally.

I don', you don't, and everyone out here knows better.
Dude...you call the man obummer...

You attack him in every post, simply for being the President.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Dude...you call the man obummer...

You attack him in every post, simply for being the President.
Untrue.

I attack him (though not in this thread and not about who travels with him mind you), simply for being a poor excuse for a president.

As I, and damned near ALL others, have with other presidents/politicians over the years. Nothing new there. What IS new, what no one likes to admit but everyone with even decent walking around sense sees, is that for the FIRST time ever, doing so will, read carefully this is important, will, as surely as God made little green apples, WILL lead to one being labeled a "racist" by those who support the president.

Try as you may you can not explain that away. Unlike so much of the blind support of this president, my opposition is the same as it has been or will be, for any other di m president who had or will have similar positions on matters as this one does.

It really is as simple as that. Others make it more complicated than necessary. All in their feeble-assed, at BEST, attempt to present themselves as more "open" or "accepting of diversity", etc.
 
Top