New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Paid shills

Sorry, marvin, but your understanding of my ideology is incorrect.
The Marxists (what they themselves deceptively call progressives and you call derisively the progreSSive left, accepting their disinformation) are the creation of and tools of the jews, and the enemies of me and mine. You're right, though, that they'll be destroyed should we gain power.
Naziism Was a Retrogression to Ancient Mindless Nordic Savagery

Germans aren't Aryans. They are predominantly descended from the Neanderthal hybrids easily conquered by the far-outnumbered Aryans in 2,000 BC. They were also about 2,000 years behind the Greeks and Romans in evolutionary development, not catching up until the Middle Ages. Here is an academically incorrect proof of their inferiority:

BATTLE OF VERCELLAE (101 BC)

Romans: 50,000
Germans: 210,000

Roman dead: 1,000
German dead: 140,000
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
Fine, so why do you not dare first eliminate what you call Jewish flunkies in the Gentile 1% or .001%? Your imaginary Jews can't do anything without your imaginary collaborators. You're a sucker covering up for them and you contradict your own fantasy. Wipe out the Gentile Gentry soldiers and the Jewish generals will have to surrender.

If we have to do it on our own, so must the children of the rich, starting at 18 when they'll have to work their way through college, living on part-time jobs like teenagers afraid to grow up. If they have the same future they do now, the rest of us have no future. They get in our way and must be removed.
No disagreement with the second paragraph. It wasn't he topic at hand.

As for the 1st paragraph: I don't cover up for collaborators. They weren't the topic at hand. They would be eliminated. I don't contradict myself. I'm not the one being suckered anymore or still living in an imaginary fantasy. Was & did -- Connetected some dots & don't any more.

Naziism Was a Retrogression to Ancient Mindless Nordic Savagery

Germans aren't Aryans. They are predominantly descended from the Neanderthal hybrids easily conquered by the far-outnumbered Aryans in 2,000 BC. They were also about 2,000 years behind the Greeks and Romans in evolutionary development, not catching up until the Middle Ages. Here is an academically incorrect proof of their inferiority:
BATTLE OF VERCELLAE (101 BC)
Romans: 50,000
Germans: 210,000
Roman dead: 1,000
German dead: 140,000
"Aryan" refers to people of noble heritage. It includes White, German Germans and many others. The ancient Romans were Aryans.

I never compared Germans to anyone else, nor said anything negative about ancient Romans.

If the "proof" is "academically incorrect" why are you citing it?

That ancient Germans were defeated decisively in a battle with ancient Romans makes no relevant point that I can discern. World War II -- the only war referred to, peripherally, in anything I posted here -- happened long after the Middle Ages, when you say the German people caught up. General Patton called Germans the last civilized people in Europe.

Odd how "Nazism"can simultaneously be "ancient mindless Nordic savagery" and "the use of advanced techniques & technology to systematically exterminate the jews."
 
Last edited:
If the "proof" is "academically incorrect" why are you citing it?

"
We Should Imitate the Jews, Not Be Jealous of Them

That's exactly why you can't understand anything. You assume that the university flunkies of the Gentile ruling-class dictatorship must be superior minds, so why would I cite something as an illustration of Nordic inferiority that in a status quo mind would be objectively incorrect? You also assume that just because I say the Jews are the most clever at, and practically the only ones, fighting back against your precious ruling class, I must be saying that they are evil and we have to get rid of them in order to get brownie points with our charismatic Masters.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
We Should Imitate the Jews, Not Be Jealous of Them
That's exactly why you can't understand anything. You assume that the university flunkies of the Gentile ruling-class dictatorship must be superior minds, so why would I cite something as an illustration of Nordic inferiority that in a status quo mind would be objectively incorrect? You also assume that just because I say the Jews are the most clever at, and practically the only ones, fighting back against your precious ruling class, I must be saying that they are evil and we have to get rid of them in order to get brownie points with our charismatic Masters.
Would you care to try that again? I don't see where most of what you wrote here is coming from at all.

Neither Nat'l Socialists nor White Nationalista nor I am jealous of the jews.
I don't assume that "university flunkies" are superior minds.
I've been quite clear that I believe the "Gentile ruling-class" is working for the jew "ruling-class" and that I have no love or respect for them and consider them enemies who need to be dealt with.
Status quo is the last thing I want, and I thought you'd seen enough of my posts to realize that.
Yes, why WOULD you "cite something as an illustration of Nordic inferiority" that would be objectively irrelevant and by your own words incorrect? That's what I was asking. Maybe I missed something; that's hardly a reason to insult me by saying I "can't understand anything."
"You also assume that just because I say the Jews are the most clever at, and practically the only ones, fighting back against your precious ruling class, I must be saying that they are evil and we have to get rid of them in order to get brownie points with our charismatic Masters."
I'm assuming nothing of the sort and have no idea what I ever posted that would make you think that I was. I never indicated that you thought jews were evil or that we had to get rid of them -- that would be me. I never indicated that any ruling-class was precious to me -- exactly the opposite.

Perhaps it wasn't me that you meant to quote -- you just clicked the wrong 'quote' button and typed a reply to someone else. This is Emily, the National Socialist, who's always shown you respect, and thanked you for thought-provoking posts, and agreed with you more often than not. Is everything all right? Are you feeling okay?
 
Last edited:
Would you care to try that again? I don't see where most of what you wrote here is coming from at all.

Neither Nat'l Socialists nor White Nationalista nor I am jealous of the jews.
I don't assume that "university flunkies" are superior minds.
I've been quite clear that I believe the "Gentile ruling-class" is working for the jew "ruling-class" and that I have no love or respect for them and consider them enemies who need to be dealt with.
Status quo is the last thing I want, and I thought you'd seen enough of my posts to realize that.
Yes, why WOULD you "cite something as an illustration of Nordic inferiority" that would be objectively irrelevant and by your own words incorrect? That's what I was asking. Maybe I missed something; that's hardly a reason to insult me by saying I "can't understand anything."
"You also assume that just because I say the Jews are the most clever at, and practically the only ones, fighting back against your precious ruling class, I must be saying that they are evil and we have to get rid of them in order to get brownie points with our charismatic Masters."
I'm assuming nothing of the sort and have no idea what I ever posted that would make you think that I was. I never indicated that you thought jews were evil or that we had to get rid of them -- that would be me. I never indicated that any ruling-class was precious to me -- exactly the opposite.

Perhaps it wasn't me that you meant to quote -- you just clicked the wrong 'quote' button and typed a reply to someone else. This is Emily, the National Socialist, who's always shown you respect.
Anti-Semitism Always Leaves a Yellow Stain

The conspiracy theories the anti-semites are fed are actually being carried out by the scheming Gentile hereditary guillotine-fodder that feeds them this scapegoat. The Nazis you admire are pathetic bootlickers of the Plutes Who Wear the Boots and mindless scabs childishly looking for a father-figure. Free men must stomp on those bowing before the Master Class and crush their skulls. No real man becomes a Buttboy for the Bosses. If someone is not a union man, he's not a man at all.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
The conspiracy theories the anti-semites are fed are actually being carried out by the scheming Gentile hereditary guillotine-fodder that feeds them this scapegoat.
Didn't really address the earlier post it quoted but, okay ... Do you have any support for this assertion?
Links, books, videos ... just a chain of deductions?
One should try to keep an open mind.
 
Didn't really address the earlier post it quoted but, okay ... Do you have any support for this assertion?
Links, books, videos ... just a chain of deductions?.
Snakes Herding Scapegoats

In order to survive, the kleptocratic parasites need to make us look the other way by creating the image of a hidden Control that forces them to treat us the way they do. Don't trust any links; the aristocrats make all of them pass an imprimatur.
 

TheResister

Council Member
Snakes Herding Scapegoats

In order to survive, the kleptocratic parasites need to make us look the other way by creating the image of a hidden Control that forces them to treat us the way they do. Don't trust any links; the aristocrats make all of them pass an imprimatur.

Is it your contention that all links are somehow controlled and nobody offers an impartial point of view?
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
In order to survive, the kleptocratic parasites need to make us look the other way by creating the image of a hidden Control that forces them to treat us the way they do.
That's your reasoning then. Okay, let's work with that...
Rothschild. Rockefeller. Soros. Jews. Three examples among others. Are THEY using
"anti-semitism" to make us look the other way?
 

Days

Commentator
That's your reasoning then. Okay, let's work with that...
Rothschild. Rockefeller. Soros. Jews. Three examples among others. Are THEY using
"anti-semitism" to make us look the other way?
absolutely. When their shady business practices of pograms against Jews and inciting world war amongst gentile nations was exposed in the press in the late 1800's, they bought up Reuters outright, to control the message. They needed some issue to deflect the spotlight away from what they were doing, something they could go to and use to squirm away from accountability for their thefts and crimes, just like an octopus uses ink in the water, they dreamed up this "anti-Semite" as an obvious copy of "anti-Christ" which they obviously were. You say we murder millions of Christians? Well then, you are an anti-Semite! How do you like those apples? And it worked.
 

TheResister

Council Member
absolutely. When their shady business practices of pograms against Jews and inciting world war amongst gentile nations was exposed in the press in the late 1800's, they bought up Reuters outright, to control the message. They needed some issue to deflect the spotlight away from what they were doing, something they could go to and use to squirm away from accountability for their thefts and crimes, just like an octopus uses ink in the water, they dreamed up this "anti-Semite" as an obvious copy of "anti-Christ" which they obviously were. You say we murder millions of Christians? Well then, you are an anti-Semite! How do you like those apples? And it worked.

I thought, in private at least, the Jews admitted they aren't semites after all.
 

Days

Commentator
I thought, in private at least, the Jews admitted they aren't semites after all.
What is a Semite? In the Bible, it is a descendant of Shem, one of the three sons of Noah. That's going to be a whole lot of people. And it is going to include Abraham... and of course all his descendants. (most of whom today are Muslim!) The Palestinians are a Semitic people. The Rothschild family, however, seems to be descendant from the Caucasian mountains steppe region, so they would be descendants of japheth, the oldest of Noah's sons. The Kurds descend from the Hittites, also Japhethites. Kind of ironic, eh?
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
Technically, Semitic is a linguistic term, not a racial one. Anyone descended of people who's native language was Semitic is a Semite. Arabic and Hebrew are the two living Semitic languages.
Most people who call themselves Jews today are descended of Khazars, from the Caucasus region as Days said, not of Biblical Israelites, not of ancient Hebrew-speakers.
Anti-semitism is a ridiculous term.
The Rothschilds & Rockefellers & so on use it in one way...
They needed some issue to deflect the spotlight away from what they were doing, something they could go to and use to squirm away from accountability for their thefts and crimes, just like an octopus uses ink in the water, they dreamed up this "anti-Semite"
...but not the way Sage asserts that the rich (Gentiles) use it.
 
Top