New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain---

Jeff Thomas is a financial analyst for the research firm Casey Research, headed by economist Doug Casey. He is a keen observer of the deceptive workings of government, and why events unfold as they do. The following is one of his latest articles and well-worth reading:

Surely This Problem Won’t Affect Me---
by Jeff Thomas | February 01, 2016

On a daily basis, I receive emails from associates in the UK and Europe that speak of the sheer madness of allowing refugees in the millions to pour into Europe. The riot in Cologne, Germany, by some 1,000 men who sexually assaulted 90 women, and robbed and threatened others, offers insight as to the scale of riots that we may expect to see in the future.

And the immigration of refugees is just beginning. The shock and horror that my associates express evidences that never before in their lifetimes have events such as these taken place, and that far worse is yet to come.

We tend to view this “scourge of the demon” as though it’s something new. Yet, in fact, it’s occurred many times before.

Randolph Bourne: “War is the health of the State.”

When there is warfare, people will subjugate themselves to the state as at no other time. They will allow themselves to be taxed and used as cannon fodder, and to have their rights stripped away, as they are in an “emergency” condition that requires sacrifice but will (hopefully) be over soon.

Unfortunately, it’s not intended to be over soon. Perpetual conflict means perpetual increase in power by political leaders. Therefore, the leaders will claim that they want it to all be over as soon as possible, but they actually will seek the opposite. Of course, the people don’t desire conflict, so they have to be fooled into believing that it’s necessary.

It’s pretty easy to stop the “invasion” by Muslims into Europe, yet we see the EU making threatening noises to all member countries that if they don’t open the floodgates and let them in, there will be hell to pay. The EU government itself is therefore creating the problem that it will later claim it’s trying to control. The wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and more) are intended, in part, to push tax dollars into the military industry and, in part, to create a distraction from the economic mismanagement of the central government. The creation of large numbers of refugees (both real refugees and opportunists) is an additional benefit to the government, as they will create disharmony and fear throughout Europe as they fail to assimilate.

The EU (and its allies) will create a crisis, then invoke martial law as an “unfortunate necessity” in order to contain the problem they’ve created. But, in doing so, you need a good marketing programme. You need regular propaganda going out to work the people up into a lather.

Joseph Goebbels: “Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”

On both sides of the Atlantic, governments, with the eager but blind assistance of the press, are creating a crisis of epic proportions. It’s essential that they do so, as they have already created an economic crisis of epic proportions and they need a distraction from that problem—one which allows them control over the people and the assurance of staying in power. Throughout history, warfare has provided that power for one group of political leaders after another.

It’s also important to make the people feel helpless, so that they’ll turn to their government to solve the problem. Therefore, the ability for individual retaliation must be taken out of the hands of the people.

The EU government are presently causing the problem through mass immigration by refugees. But, surely, the very idea that such an influx of uncontrollable people could be a good thing is preposterous. How could anyone ever believe that any good could come of this?

The “Muslim question” has been made into a political issue. Conservatives who see themselves as “sensible” will oppose the immigration, whilst liberals who see themselves as “caring” will support it. The extreme polarisation between factions will ensure that the lie (as absurd as it is) will receive the immovable support of roughly 50% of the population of Europe (and countries abroad).

Still, intelligent people are saying to each other every day, “Don’t these politicians get it? Don’t they understand that this influx of Muslims is a disaster in the making?” Well, yes, actually, they understand that all too well, which is why they’re all on board.

As in both of the previous world wars, we shall see the charade play out again. Each country in Europe will, in turn, join the war with “the enemy.” At some point, Russia will get dragged in, either through an overzealous military action, or through a false-flag attack, and a world war will be on.

The US and Canada, at first, will just contribute armaments and advisors, but, eventually, the American people will be persuaded that, without their involvement, the Muslims will overrun America as well. If the Americans don’t fall into line on cue, false-flag incidents will be created that will cost American lives that point directly to Muslims. Again, this is nothing new. The Americans have been dragged into war repeatedly in the same way in the past.

The question is not whether Muslims will overrun Europe. They will. (That’s the objective.) The question is not whether there will be war. There will be. The question is whether you live in a place that will be safe when it occurs or whether your present location will become unlivable at some point.
 

Days

Commentator
Jeff Thomas is a financial analyst for the research firm Casey Research, headed by economist Doug Casey. He is a keen observer of the deceptive workings of government, and why events unfold as they do. The following is one of his latest articles and well-worth reading:

Surely This Problem Won’t Affect Me---
by Jeff Thomas | February 01, 2016

On a daily basis, I receive emails from associates in the UK and Europe that speak of the sheer madness of allowing refugees in the millions to pour into Europe. The riot in Cologne, Germany, by some 1,000 men who sexually assaulted 90 women, and robbed and threatened others, offers insight as to the scale of riots that we may expect to see in the future.

And the immigration of refugees is just beginning. The shock and horror that my associates express evidences that never before in their lifetimes have events such as these taken place, and that far worse is yet to come.

We tend to view this “scourge of the demon” as though it’s something new. Yet, in fact, it’s occurred many times before.

Randolph Bourne: “War is the health of the State.”

When there is warfare, people will subjugate themselves to the state as at no other time. They will allow themselves to be taxed and used as cannon fodder, and to have their rights stripped away, as they are in an “emergency” condition that requires sacrifice but will (hopefully) be over soon.

Unfortunately, it’s not intended to be over soon. Perpetual conflict means perpetual increase in power by political leaders. Therefore, the leaders will claim that they want it to all be over as soon as possible, but they actually will seek the opposite. Of course, the people don’t desire conflict, so they have to be fooled into believing that it’s necessary.

It’s pretty easy to stop the “invasion” by Muslims into Europe, yet we see the EU making threatening noises to all member countries that if they don’t open the floodgates and let them in, there will be hell to pay. The EU government itself is therefore creating the problem that it will later claim it’s trying to control. The wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and more) are intended, in part, to push tax dollars into the military industry and, in part, to create a distraction from the economic mismanagement of the central government. The creation of large numbers of refugees (both real refugees and opportunists) is an additional benefit to the government, as they will create disharmony and fear throughout Europe as they fail to assimilate.

The EU (and its allies) will create a crisis, then invoke martial law as an “unfortunate necessity” in order to contain the problem they’ve created. But, in doing so, you need a good marketing programme. You need regular propaganda going out to work the people up into a lather.

Joseph Goebbels: “Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”

On both sides of the Atlantic, governments, with the eager but blind assistance of the press, are creating a crisis of epic proportions. It’s essential that they do so, as they have already created an economic crisis of epic proportions and they need a distraction from that problem—one which allows them control over the people and the assurance of staying in power. Throughout history, warfare has provided that power for one group of political leaders after another.

It’s also important to make the people feel helpless, so that they’ll turn to their government to solve the problem. Therefore, the ability for individual retaliation must be taken out of the hands of the people.

The EU government are presently causing the problem through mass immigration by refugees. But, surely, the very idea that such an influx of uncontrollable people could be a good thing is preposterous. How could anyone ever believe that any good could come of this?

The “Muslim question” has been made into a political issue. Conservatives who see themselves as “sensible” will oppose the immigration, whilst liberals who see themselves as “caring” will support it. The extreme polarisation between factions will ensure that the lie (as absurd as it is) will receive the immovable support of roughly 50% of the population of Europe (and countries abroad).

Still, intelligent people are saying to each other every day, “Don’t these politicians get it? Don’t they understand that this influx of Muslims is a disaster in the making?” Well, yes, actually, they understand that all too well, which is why they’re all on board.

As in both of the previous world wars, we shall see the charade play out again. Each country in Europe will, in turn, join the war with “the enemy.” At some point, Russia will get dragged in, either through an overzealous military action, or through a false-flag attack, and a world war will be on.

The US and Canada, at first, will just contribute armaments and advisors, but, eventually, the American people will be persuaded that, without their involvement, the Muslims will overrun America as well. If the Americans don’t fall into line on cue, false-flag incidents will be created that will cost American lives that point directly to Muslims. Again, this is nothing new. The Americans have been dragged into war repeatedly in the same way in the past.

The question is not whether Muslims will overrun Europe. They will. (That’s the objective.) The question is not whether there will be war. There will be. The question is whether you live in a place that will be safe when it occurs or whether your present location will become unlivable at some point.
Okay, here we are: 2016

These tribulations will run: 2000-2025

that's the 4th horse; Death and Hell. The great tribulation period. Immediately after the great tribulation comes the end of man's self-rule. The time of Jacob's trouble; when, first, the 2 witnesses testify while world war rages; the result of that world war is the ascendency to power of the anti-Christ and his world capital is Jerusalem.

the end of the world testimony: 2028-2035

Somewhere like 2030, the four angels bound up in the river Euphrates are unleashed and that war kills a third of mankind. The Euphrates runs from southern Turkey, through all of Syria, into northern Iraq... dumping into the northern tip of the Persian Gulf. That entire river is the exact location of hostilities right now. Read this article, just posted in Australian news...

President Assad has now warned Turkey that any ground incursion into Syria will have “global repercussions”. (LINK)

What has dawned on me very recently is the nature of that world war (Revelation 9:13-21). It isn't nuclear. It is fire, smoke and brimstone (brimstone is sulfur, the main component of gun powder) that kills everyone, exactly like the bombing they show in the linked article. Aka, conventional warfare between 200 million combatants.

Where you gonna hide?
 
Last edited:
Okay, here we are: 2016

These tribulations will run: 2000-2025

that's the 4th horse; Death and Hell. The great tribulation period. Immediately after the great tribulation comes the end of man's self-rule. The time of Jacob's trouble; when, first, the 2 witnesses testify while world war rages; the result of that world war is the ascendency to power of the anti-Christ and his world capital is Jerusalem.

the end of the world testimony: 2028-2035

Somewhere like 2030, the four angels bound up in the river Euphrates are unleashed and that war kills a third of mankind. The Euphrates runs from southern Turkey, through all of Syria, into northern Iraq... dumping into the northern tip of the Persian Gulf. That entire river is the exact location of hostilities right now. Read this article, just posted in Australian news...

President Assad has now warned Turkey that any ground incursion into Syria will have “global repercussions”. (LINK)

What has dawned on me very recently is the nature of that world war (Revelation 9:13-21). It isn't nuclear. It is fire, smoke and brimstone (brimstone is sulfur, the main component of gun powder) that kills everyone, exactly like the bombing they show in the linked article. Aka, conventional warfare between 200 million combatants.

Where you gonna hide?
An interesting synopsis, Days. Are you familiar with the Three World Wars letter written by Albert Pike to Giuseppi Mazzini in 1871? Mazzini was Head of the Illuminati in Europe at that time and Pike was Sovereign Grand Commander of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in the U.S. All of this chaos across the Fertile Crescent was planned a long time ago. [Read the letter--can be Googled on-line]. And the tip of the Illuminati spear at the heart of the Middle East is----Israel!! Israel---the master-mind behind all this chaos. The master-mind that nobody pays attention to in the midst of the chaos. The innocent by-stander. The master-mind that sits back and watches, as the stoopid Goyim are ensnared in its web of deceit and manipulation. Its agents are active everywhere--all working under-cover--in Syria, in Iraq, among the Kurds, within ISIS, among the Syrian Freedom Fighters--everywhere. ISIS is a Mossad operation, headed by Israeli military commanders (proven beyond doubt).

Khazarian Israel: serial killer, mass murderer, and destroyer of nations. Nuclear-armed. Run by psychopaths. Loved and worshiped by stoopid Goys.

Of course, Israel does not act alone in this global NWO power-play; it has the financial power of the Rothschild clique in London behind it, and the Rockenfelders in New York; the same clique that financed the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917; the same clique that founded Israel. This also means that, in Zionist Britain, MI-6 is always ready to help the Mossad from the shadows, doing its bit for the NWO. In Zionist America, our own CIA stands ready to render assistance. No, Israel does not act alone in its evil deeds; it is ably assisted by other forces from the shadows. Even corrupt Arab states help Israel in its evil; countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and Egypt. The world is ripe for major cleansing, Days; it has distanced itself too far from the Creator. What form this cleansing will take remains to be seen.

I was able to recognize Israel's foot-print within ISIS long before anyone woke up to it. Of course, as usual, I was immediately attacked by 'clueless Goys' as a 'conspiracy theorist'; those Goys who are quick to rise up in defense of the very force that is destroying their civilization. I feel sorry for the American people. I fear they will never recover from the Serpent's bite. The poison has spread too far into the body, and the patient is dying.

 
Last edited:

Days

Commentator
An interesting synopsis, Days. Are you familiar with the Three World Wars letter written by Albert Pike to Giuseppi Mazzini in 1871? Mazzini was Head of the Illuminati in Europe at that time and Pike was Sovereign Grand Commander of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in the U.S. All of this chaos across the Fertile Crescent was planned a long time ago. [Read the letter--can be Googled on-line]. And the tip of the Illuminati spear at the heart of the Middle East is----Israel!! Israel---the master-mind behind all this chaos. The master-mind that nobody pays attention to in the midst of the chaos. The innocent by-stander. The master-mind that sits back and watches, as the stoopid Goyim are ensnared in its web of deceit and manipulation. Its agents are active everywhere--all working under-cover--in Syria, in Iraq, among the Kurds, within ISIS, among the Syrian Freedom Fighters--everywhere. ISIS is a Mossad operation, headed by Israeli military commanders (proven beyond doubt).

Of course, Israel does not act alone in this global NWO power-play; it has the financial power of the Rothschild clique in London behind it, and the Rockenfelders in New York; the same clique that financed the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917; the same clique that founded Israel. This also means that, in Zionist Britain, MI-6 is always ready to help the Mossad from the shadows, doing its bit for the NWO. In Zionist America, our own CIA stands ready to render assistance. No, Israel does not act alone in its evil deeds; it is ably assisted by other forces from the shadows. Even corrupt Arab states help Israel in its evil; countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and Egypt. The world is ripe for major cleansing, Days; it has distanced itself too far from the Creator.

I was able to recognize Israel's foot-print within ISIS long before anyone woke up to it. Of course, as usual, I was immediately attacked by 'clueless Goys' as a 'conspiracy theorist'; those Goys who are quick to rise up in defense of the very force that is destroying their civilization. I feel sorry for the American people. I fear they will never recover from the Serpent's bite.

I was familiar with Albert Pike, but didn't read the letter itself until you posted it in one of your threads. That article in Australia was well written in that it shows how everyone involved in this mess is afraid to back down, it is reminiscent of the start of world war one.

The Rothschild nations want the war. The BRIC nations are afraid to stand back and let them keep swallowing nations one at a time. Their backs are against the wall. No one wants nuclear Armageddon, but no one thinks we can have a conventional Armageddon... even though we have been to the edge of that hell twice already.

If we didn't have a 2000 year old prophecy telling us that this results in a conventional war that kills a third of mankind, just 15 years down the road, who would have thunk it?
 
The Two-Party Illusion
by Jeff Thomas | February 29, 2016


“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil.”
- John Adams


The Great Illusion of the two-party system is that it allows the voter a choice – usually between a liberal and a conservative government. The reality is that, whichever party wins the election, the government is, in truth, a totalitarian one. The “choice” is a mere distraction from the true objective.

Recently, an American college student, Justin Snyder, commented on his choice for his country’s next president and his reasons for it. Mister Snyder said, in part,

"I support Hillary Clinton for president … When you add up her knowhow, leadership, and experience, it's clear that Hillary Clinton is a perfect fit to be the commander-in-chief of the largest military the world has ever seen … The thing is, we've been trying the free market thing for centuries. All we have to show for it is a super wealthy class of people who run the country. What we need is someone to represent the common man, and that someone is Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

Mister Snyder has done quite well in absorbing the modern liberal party line, one that both advances itself on the concept of collectivism, yet reverses itself on its position just two generations ago that war is an evil concept, promoted by conservatives in an effort to control the world.

His comments are not unusual, and that’s what makes them significant. He’s a modern, educated, effectively indoctrinated liberal. His political counterpart is a modern, educated, effectively indoctrinated conservative. Together, they comprise the backbone of governmental dominance over a people: different party, same blind acceptance of political party dogma.

John Adams had it right in his 1780 letter to Jonathan Jackson, as quoted above. He understood that the old method of thought control – that of kings ordering their vassals what to believe – had had its day. It had never been fully effective, as the vassal was free to decide whether he believed the king. But, as early as 1780, the future would belong to those politicians who were skilled in giving the public “A” and “B” choices.

People need to believe that they have a choice. Interestingly, though, they seem to be content with only two choices. A skilled politician therefore limits the number of choices to two and, today, this is the way it’s done in most “advanced” countries. Whether it’s Democrat vs. Republican, or Tory vs. Labour, there are two dominant parties. Each is represented by a group of individuals seeking to gain or maintain public office.

Initially, in order to sell the two-party concept to voters, it’s important for each party to have a philosophical identity. These two identities would seem to need to be based on opposing primary principles or ideologies, such as a free market system vs. collectivism, or empire-building warfare vs. a commitment to peace.

The US did, indeed, follow this route in developing its own primary sports teams, the Democrats and the Republicans. And, along the way, it learned that the public can be best manipulated if they are blindly devoted to either one team or the other. (Those in the red T-shirts detest those in the blue, and vice versa.)

Once this blind devotion has been achieved, it becomes possible to dispense with the extreme polarity of principles and ideology. As stated above, only two generations ago, there was a “collectivism and peace” party and a “free market and empire” party in the US. What they had in common, however, was that both required an increasingly larger government to support its objectives.

Today, the US political system has evolved to the point that the principles and ideology are disappearing. Today, Democrats fully accept and even encourage overseas aggression. This has been achieved through the illusion of “terrorism.” Similarly, the Republicans have watered down their commitment to a free market system through the soma of ever-widening entitlements.

No longer is it necessary that the two dogmas are polar opposites. They can only be five degrees apart from each other, yet each team of supporters fully believes his team is morally right and the other team is morally wrong. Meanwhile, they’re both headed toward the same warfare/welfare end. And of course, both teams fully accept the concept that an ever-expanding government role is necessary in achieving these ends.

But how is it possible that the principles and ideologies have been virtually erased? After all, the very idea of principles is that they are not based on popularity, but on inner conviction. Well, truth be told, the great majority of people have no real moral compass at all; no real inner sense of convictions. Their convictions can be manipulated in such a way that the portion of the brain that wishes to deal with convictions can be redirected into areas that are of little consequence.

On the surface of it, this seems like a bold and even radical statement, yet, as we can readily see, as long as never-ending debates are maintained over the less vital issues, such as abortion rights, gay rights, etc., a people can be distracted away from primary principles. Therefore, the government has the ability to create the illusion that a two-party system exists when, in truth, as the caption below the above photo states,

“VOTING: It’s deciding which criminal gets to steal everything you have.”

The concept of a government as a body of individuals that are chosen by election to represent the voters is a good one, but it’s not a concept that’s shared by those who are elected. Those who are elected almost unanimously see the concept as one in which the rulers are determined. They have no illusion about representation, although they do understand that they must give the impression to voters that they see themselves as representatives. Rulers seek to rule. All other concerns are secondary.
 

Days

Commentator
The Two-Party Illusion
by Jeff Thomas | February 29, 2016


“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil.”
- John Adams


The Great Illusion of the two-party system is that it allows the voter a choice – usually between a liberal and a conservative government. The reality is that, whichever party wins the election, the government is, in truth, a totalitarian one. The “choice” is a mere distraction from the true objective.

Recently, an American college student, Justin Snyder, commented on his choice for his country’s next president and his reasons for it. Mister Snyder said, in part,

"I support Hillary Clinton for president … When you add up her knowhow, leadership, and experience, it's clear that Hillary Clinton is a perfect fit to be the commander-in-chief of the largest military the world has ever seen … The thing is, we've been trying the free market thing for centuries. All we have to show for it is a super wealthy class of people who run the country. What we need is someone to represent the common man, and that someone is Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

Mister Snyder has done quite well in absorbing the modern liberal party line, one that both advances itself on the concept of collectivism, yet reverses itself on its position just two generations ago that war is an evil concept, promoted by conservatives in an effort to control the world.

His comments are not unusual, and that’s what makes them significant. He’s a modern, educated, effectively indoctrinated liberal. His political counterpart is a modern, educated, effectively indoctrinated conservative. Together, they comprise the backbone of governmental dominance over a people: different party, same blind acceptance of political party dogma.

John Adams had it right in his 1780 letter to Jonathan Jackson, as quoted above. He understood that the old method of thought control – that of kings ordering their vassals what to believe – had had its day. It had never been fully effective, as the vassal was free to decide whether he believed the king. But, as early as 1780, the future would belong to those politicians who were skilled in giving the public “A” and “B” choices.

People need to believe that they have a choice. Interestingly, though, they seem to be content with only two choices. A skilled politician therefore limits the number of choices to two and, today, this is the way it’s done in most “advanced” countries. Whether it’s Democrat vs. Republican, or Tory vs. Labour, there are two dominant parties. Each is represented by a group of individuals seeking to gain or maintain public office.

Initially, in order to sell the two-party concept to voters, it’s important for each party to have a philosophical identity. These two identities would seem to need to be based on opposing primary principles or ideologies, such as a free market system vs. collectivism, or empire-building warfare vs. a commitment to peace.

The US did, indeed, follow this route in developing its own primary sports teams, the Democrats and the Republicans. And, along the way, it learned that the public can be best manipulated if they are blindly devoted to either one team or the other. (Those in the red T-shirts detest those in the blue, and vice versa.)

Once this blind devotion has been achieved, it becomes possible to dispense with the extreme polarity of principles and ideology. As stated above, only two generations ago, there was a “collectivism and peace” party and a “free market and empire” party in the US. What they had in common, however, was that both required an increasingly larger government to support its objectives.

Today, the US political system has evolved to the point that the principles and ideology are disappearing. Today, Democrats fully accept and even encourage overseas aggression. This has been achieved through the illusion of “terrorism.” Similarly, the Republicans have watered down their commitment to a free market system through the soma of ever-widening entitlements.

No longer is it necessary that the two dogmas are polar opposites. They can only be five degrees apart from each other, yet each team of supporters fully believes his team is morally right and the other team is morally wrong. Meanwhile, they’re both headed toward the same warfare/welfare end. And of course, both teams fully accept the concept that an ever-expanding government role is necessary in achieving these ends.

But how is it possible that the principles and ideologies have been virtually erased? After all, the very idea of principles is that they are not based on popularity, but on inner conviction. Well, truth be told, the great majority of people have no real moral compass at all; no real inner sense of convictions. Their convictions can be manipulated in such a way that the portion of the brain that wishes to deal with convictions can be redirected into areas that are of little consequence.

On the surface of it, this seems like a bold and even radical statement, yet, as we can readily see, as long as never-ending debates are maintained over the less vital issues, such as abortion rights, gay rights, etc., a people can be distracted away from primary principles. Therefore, the government has the ability to create the illusion that a two-party system exists when, in truth, as the caption below the above photo states,

“VOTING: It’s deciding which criminal gets to steal everything you have.”

The concept of a government as a body of individuals that are chosen by election to represent the voters is a good one, but it’s not a concept that’s shared by those who are elected. Those who are elected almost unanimously see the concept as one in which the rulers are determined. They have no illusion about representation, although they do understand that they must give the impression to voters that they see themselves as representatives. Rulers seek to rule. All other concerns are secondary.
the bigger the government, the more I can steal. So, when I tell you that I'm for smaller government... hahahahahaha, sure I am.
 
the bigger the government, the more I can steal. So, when I tell you that I'm for smaller government... hahahahahaha, sure I am.
"There’s really no point to voting. If it made any difference, it would probably be illegal."

~H. L. Mencken
 

Days

Commentator
"There’s really no point to voting. If it made any difference, it would probably be illegal."

~H. L. Mencken
I didn't even bother to register the last time I moved (9 yrs ago)

The state of Illinois is so screwed up that they can't pass a budget... period. This has been going on for years. We don't get mailings any more when our registration needs to be renewed, its up to us to renew... so forget using the mail or the internet, hoof it down to the sec of state office and stand in line behind a million people. Sometimes the office is so jammed with people that you can't enter the door. These are huge offices, hundreds of people in there, and not uncommon for the A/C to go on the blink on hottest days.

I've lived in Mexico... its not as fuc*ed up as Illinois.
 
Last edited:
I didn't even bother to register the last time I moved (9 yrs ago)

The state of Illinois is so screwed up that they can't pass a budget... period. This has been going on for years. We don't get mailings any more when our registration needs to be renewed, its up to us to renew... so forget using the mail or the internet, hoof it down to the sec of state office and stand in line behind a million people. Sometimes the office is so jammed with people that you can't enter the door. These are huge offices, hundreds of people in there, and not uncommon for the A/C to go on the blink on hottest days.
I've lived in Mexico... its not as fuc*ed up as Illinois.
The chaos you are witnessing in Illinois will spread throughout the country, Days. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see it coming. It was planned that way. It goes hand-in hand with 'diversity' and the polyglot boarding house that America has become. I see the same thing happening in my own city; the creeping paralysis as those minorities who are not remotely qualified are given titles and responsibilities they are incapable of handling. Advancement based on skin color and ethnic background, rather than experience and capability, is another 'killer' that spells America's death knell. The death of a thousand cuts. Planned that way, as Americans sit inside their little cages (called homes), eyes fixed on TV, and fret and fume over Muslim terrorists coming to America to kill them.

Btw, why doesn't Rahm Emmanuel (the notorious fixer) fix things up for you folks in Chicago? Or has he already done that?
 
Last edited:
Top