Physically weak men are usually Socialists

[write on]

omg


I love it when the Nazi accusations come flying out.

Another liberal trait.



bye-bye

Deny all you want. All that denial proves is that you are the sheep that Dotard needs..

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/04/trumps-assault-on-rule-of-law/557600/

 

[EatTheRich]

Back in 1998 I was 100% amenable to the possibility of compromise. Every year thereafter it decreased by 5%. It's been 20 years. You do the math.

So you’re an ex-liberal?

 

[EatTheRich]

Don't think that this won't happen here. And it will if one political party succeeds in its quest.

And that party is REPUBLICAN.

You people are like sheep. That's obvious by the way you continue to defend the criminal trump administration.

https://www.google.com/search?q=china+surveillance+state&client=firefox-b-1&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYiqetzorfAhWpJTQIHae8DsEQ_AUIECgD&biw=1280&bih=596

Both big-business parties are working to build the imperial state and cut down on our opportunities to dissent. The differences between them are tactical.

 

[resident_evil]

So you’re an ex-liberal?

Where does it say that (classical) liberals should compromise?

 

[write on]

So you’re an ex-liberal?

Greed consumed him. Don't believe their lies about how you get more conservative as you age.

 

[write on]

Both big-business parties are working to build the imperial state and cut down on our opportunities to dissent. The differences between them are tactical.

Yes, but the Democratic party isn't fascist.

 

[resident_evil]

Greed consumed him. Don't believe their lies about how you get more conservative as you age.

View attachment 41039

Get yourself a penis already. Join the army or get a patreon account.

 

[write on]

Get yourself a penis already. Join the army or get a patreon account.

No worries here. But I know you and your ilk always try to embellish.

You do what you feel you need to, eh? LOL

 

[EatTheRich]

Where does it say that (classical) liberals should compromise?

John Locke, Letter Concerning Toleration
Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments
The Federalist Papers

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

Nothing like changing the subject so you can ridicule Trump.

Person 1: 'insert general comment about weather, robust economy, etc...'

Person 2: 'yeah, well Trump still sucks! I win, woot!!!'

 

[John T]

Greed consumed him. Don't believe their lies about how you get more conservative as you age.

View attachment 41039

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Is why we can't have nice things.

 

[middleview]

Such a baby.

For some reason you think personal attacks are helping you make your case. They just make you look like a child.

 

[middleview]

Nope, not yet. And I suspect you don't knew me either. Right?

What I'm doing is calling the right wing out. I DO know their game and won't let them get away with it- even though it's done on a miniscule right wing debate forum.

My beef is the labeling. I'm a Liberal. I know what a Liberal is, because I AM one.

While here, I'll not sit and read what a bunch of far right wingers try to redefine what one is.

View attachment 41033

If you want to go on with the false definition of what a Liberal is, then we don't need to talk anymore.

So?

The right wingers here will try to define democrats by the standard of what the democratic party in the South was in 1865...as if nothing at all changed when the democrats passed the Civil Rights act in 1964.

They'll try to redefine fascism based on a 1920 Nazi party platform that was never implemented and was discarded to get bankers and industrialists to join up. They'll ignore that all of the Nazi party platforms through the end of the war were very much in tune with the republican party of today.

Then there is the term "communist". When @Capitalist or @Raoul_Luke run out of steam they'll start calling everyone who disagrees with them "communist" or "socialist'. They'll never agree to inspect what happens on the extreme right...as if nothing bad can happen on that end of the spectrum. As if a government run by businesses and the wealthy would be a good thing.

 

[John T]

The right wingers here will try to define democrats by the standard of what the democratic party in the South was in 1865...as if nothing at all changed when the democrats passed the Civil Rights act in 1964.

They'll try to redefine fascism based on a 1920 Nazi party platform that was never implemented and was discarded to get bankers and industrialists to join up. They'll ignore that all of the Nazi party platforms through the end of the war were very much in tune with the republican party of today.

Then there is the term "communist". When @Capitalist or @Raoul_Luke run out of steam they'll start calling everyone who disagrees with them "communist" or "socialist'. They'll never agree to inspect what happens on the extreme right...as if nothing bad can happen on that end of the spectrum. As if a government run by businesses and the wealthy would be a good thing.

Still trying to justify what you are, huh?

It's OK ....

We all already know.

 

[John T]

Democrat accused of repeated use of women’s restroom will resign in January


Any questions about demasculated Leftist?

 

[Sickofleft]

Surprise, surprise. Men who are physically weak are more likely to favor socialist policies.

An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.

Is this true?

I can't for the life of me think of where anyone would have gotten such a notion?

 

[resident_evil]

No worries here. But I know you and your ilk always try to embellish.

You do what you feel you need to, eh? LOL

View attachment 41040

How's it go...? If you're 20 and not a liberal you have no heart. If you're 35 and you're not a conservative you have no brain.

Or feelings do not equal thinking.

 

[resident_evil]

The right wingers here will try to define democrats by the standard of what the democratic party in the South was in 1865...as if nothing at all changed when the democrats passed the Civil Rights act in 1964.

They'll try to redefine fascism based on a 1920 Nazi party platform that was never implemented and was discarded to get bankers and industrialists to join up. They'll ignore that all of the Nazi party platforms through the end of the war were very much in tune with the republican party of today.

Then there is the term "communist". When @Capitalist or @Raoul_Luke run out of steam they'll start calling everyone who disagrees with them "communist" or "socialist'. They'll never agree to inspect what happens on the extreme right...as if nothing bad can happen on that end of the spectrum. As if a government run by businesses and the wealthy would be a good thing.

You're a communist Middler. A mediocre communist but a communist nonetheless.

 

[Jen]

For some reason you think personal attacks are helping you make your case. They just make you look like a child.

(maybe you should read and heed your own words here)

 

[middleview]

Still trying to justify what you are, huh?

It's OK ....

We all already know.

Still trying to justify the irrational and irrelevant use of labels to avoid actually discussing the issues?