No their part was to submit an incomplete and faux narrative in bad faith. It will now be disassembled, and in so doing expose their conspiracy to the American people
that’s the talking point, but in reality, trumps disapproval rating is still higher than his approval rating. You have the affirmative action of the electoral college on your side, which could be the difference again, but it’s far from a given. November will be interesting.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. The central facts are not even disputed. There is no “faux narrative.” What Trump did is clear. The only remaining question is whether Trump’s conduct will be sanctified by the GOP senators. At which point our constitutional framework will be shredded, and we will have government akin to a monarchy.
I agree
No that is a lie, there is an obfuscation of fact, context and reality are now being applied.
It’s not very persuasive to screech “Lie!”
Which person currently being broadcast from the chamber is screeching the word lie?
Margain of error....LMAO. That means the difference is just as likely to be even more as less.
None. I was referring to you, who just called me a liar without so much as trying to substantiate your charge. I think you know that.
you could have stopped right there...but I digress...
you mean like EVERY witness saying they had no first hand knowledge of any actual wrong doing? Like EVERY witness saying it was 'presumption' on their part? THAT kind of testimony?
a thing you should remember next time you do it...which should be in about 3....2...1......
You speak as if I doubted that the GOP senators will sanctify Trump’s lawlessness through acquittal. Not so. We are about to have a de facto monarchy.
You said the central fact is not in dispute
He disputes their dispute.
