POS Ukraine-born LTC Vindman Was Reprimanded For Trashing America To Russian Military Offiers!

[Deleted member 21794]

You must never question a decorated war hero. Ever!



Well, unless the decorated war hero is outing DNC conspirator, Ukrainian-American LTC Vindman. Right, liberals?????

What a shocker... turns out Vindman is an America-hater who trashed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers. A decorated war hero has spoken out against this POS Vindman:

The New York Times on Thursday covered U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jim Hickman’s explosive allegations against Democrat “star witness” Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman by casting aspersions on Hickman’s character.

Last week, Hickman divulged on Twitter that Vindman “really talked up” President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers when Hickman worked with him in Grafenwoher, Germany in 2013. Hickman said that he “verbally reprimanded” then-Major Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. “Do not let the uniform fool you,” Hickman wrote. “He is a political activist in uniform.”

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/12/new-york-times-trashes-combat-veteran-dared-give-account-alexander-vindman/

So yeah, big shocker, eh? The original leaker is a DNC operative who conspired with Schitt. The guy he did the scam with is a Ukrainian-born America- and American hater and Obama lover (who, of course, also hates America). Oh please Lord, let DemocRATS impeach and have this go to trial.

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

Who cares?


The MAGA Suckers Lord, Savior and Putin Whore Donald Trump trashes America and her heroes all the time so MAGA Suckers should be praising Vindman no?!!?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Who cares?


The MAGA Suckers Lord, Savior and Putin Whore Donald Trump trashes America and her heroes all the time so MAGA Suckers should be praising Vindman no?!!?

Who cares? Americans. But hey, if you want to go on record being fine with US military officers trashing their country to foreign military officers, that's on you.

Now... there's an alternative. You can breathe deep, try to evict Trump from your head for ten seconds and address the topic?

No? No problem. Didn't think so.

 

[ObamacareForever]

You must never question a decorated war hero. Ever!

View attachment 46225

Well, unless the decorated war hero is outing DNC conspirator, Ukrainian-American LTC Vindman. Right, liberals?????

What a shocker... turns out Vindman is an America-hater who trashed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers. A decorated war hero has spoken out against this POS Vindman:

The New York Times on Thursday covered U.S. Army Lt. Col. Jim Hickman’s explosive allegations against Democrat “star witness” Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman by casting aspersions on Hickman’s character.

Last week, Hickman divulged on Twitter that Vindman “really talked up” President Barack Obama and ridiculed America and Americans in front of Russian military officers when Hickman worked with him in Grafenwoher, Germany in 2013. Hickman said that he “verbally reprimanded” then-Major Vindman after he heard some of his derisive remarks for himself. “Do not let the uniform fool you,” Hickman wrote. “He is a political activist in uniform.”

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/12/new-york-times-trashes-combat-veteran-dared-give-account-alexander-vindman/

So yeah, big shocker, eh? The original leaker is a DNC operative who conspired with Schitt. The guy he did the scam with is a Ukrainian-born America- and American hater and Obama lover (who, of course, also hates America). Oh please Lord, let DemocRATS impeach and have this go to trial.

So what?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

So what?

So Vindman is an anti-American traitor. That's so what. However, you're the second liberal to be on record as believing it's OK for US military officers to trash their country to foreign military officers. Maybe you can get the Colonel who reprimanded him court-martialed.

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

Who cares? Americans...

Mostly MAGA Suckers who support Russia via Red Don hating America's heroes and praising America's enemies.

But hey, if you want to go on record being fine with US military officers trashing their country to foreign military officers, that's on you.

Nope, I'm not fine with it but don't believe the person who reported this because he sounds like a true MAGA Sucker hack.

Either way, what do ... YOU ... care if American vets and service people are denigrated?. You support Trump who sucks what ever body part Putin has and denigrates America's heroes.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Mostly MAGA Suckers who support Russia via Red Don hating America's heroes and praising America's enemies.



Nope, I'm not fine with it but don't believe the person who reported this because he sounds like a true MAGA Sucker hack.

Either way, what do ... YOU ... care if American vets and service people are denigrated?. You support Trump who sucks what ever body part Putin has and denigrates America's heroes.

Sorry, according to liberal rules, you cannot criticize or trash a decorated war hero. It's not allowed. Oops!

Oh and what a shame you couldn't evict Trump from his free rent in what's left of your brain for two minutes. It appears TDS is terminal.

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

So Vindman is an anti-American traitor..

Says the person who supports Trump who was elected with the help of the Russians.

However, you're the second liberal to be on record as believing it's OK for US military officers to trash their country to foreign military officers.

Realistic criticism is not "trashing" and no one believes the source of this report seeing the sound like a MAGA Sucker

...Maybe you can get the Colonel who reprimanded him court-martialed.

Possibly, especially if the reprimand was verbal and there are no witness's

 

[ObamacareForever]

So Vindman is an anti-American traitor. That's so what. However, you're the second liberal to be on record as believing it's OK for US military officers to trash their country to foreign military officers. Maybe you can get the Colonel who reprimanded him court-martialed.

None of that refutes any of his testimony or the whistleblower's complaint or anyone's else testimony.
Also none of that is true.

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

Sorry, according to liberal rules, you cannot criticize or trash a decorated war hero. It's not allowed. Oops!...

... that isn't a political hack.

There, fixed it for you

...Oh and what a shame you couldn't evict Trump from his free rent in what's left of your brain for two minutes. It appears TDS is terminal.

Nah, what's in my head now is all the MAGA Suckers who claimed Pelosi wouldn't impeach and she is.

Next impeachment and removal is for Pence ... care to make predictions on his impeachment?

tia

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Says the person who supports Trump who was elected with the help of the Russians.

No. Says Vindman himself with his trashing his country to Russia.

Realistic criticism is not "trashing" and no one believes the source of this report seeing the sound like a MAGA Sucker

Trashing one's country to a foreign military is entirely inappropriate if not a court martial offense.

Possibly, especially if the reprimand was verbal and there are no witness's

*witnesses, not "witness's" LOL

So you're sure POS Vindman will deny this happened? Be careful what you pray for. You might get it.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

None of that refutes any of his testimony or the whistleblower's complaint or anyone's else testimony.
Also none of that is true.

The origins of an investigation and the intentions of accusers is always relevant. Don't worry, this will all be sorted out in public, under Republican Senate rules should the House vote to impeach.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

... that isn't a political hack.

There, fixed it for you



Nah, what's in my head now is all the MAGA Suckers who claimed Pelosi wouldn't impeach and she is.

Next impeachment and removal is for Pence ... care to make predictions on his impeachment?

tia

Well yes, of course fellow DNC hacks Eric Ciaramella and LTC Vindman are political hacks. No one is disputing that.

As for Pelosi, irrelevant. There is no impeachment without a vote. So far, all you have is a clown show.

 

[ObamacareForever]

The origins of an investigation and the intentions of accusers is always relevant.

The origins of the investigation are the actions of the president.
The motives for reporting a crime have no bearing on the crime itself.
This is like arguing someone who commits murder with six witnesses is not-guilty because their ex-wife reported it. The logic in the argument is non-existent.

Don't worry, this will all be sorted out in public, under Republican Senate rules should the House vote to impeach.

When the House is done gathering evidence.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Well yes, of course fellow DNC hacks Eric Ciaramella and LTC Vindman are political hacks.

So what?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

So what?

So Americans like to know the facts. And the impeachment inquiry scam originating from two DNC hacks conspiring with each other and Adam Schitt is relevant information. But again, don't worry. It will all come out at trial. And I'm sure Adam Schitt will obey his subpoena. You know, since he thinks not complying is obstruction of justice, right?

 

[ObamacareForever]

So Americans like to know the facts. And the impeachment inquiry scam originating from two DNC hacks conspiring with each other and Adam Schitt is relevant information. But again, don't worry. It will all come out at trial. And I'm sure Adam Schitt will obey his subpoena. You know, since he thinks not complying is obstruction of justice, right?

Again you have failed to refute the whistleblower complaint or any testimony corroborating it. You are merely stating you don't like the people who are testifying. You aren't refuting anything they said.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

The origins of the investigation are the actions of the president.
The motives for reporting a crime have no bearing on the crime itself.
This is like arguing someone who commits murder with six witnesses is not-guilty because their ex-wife reported it. The logic in the argument is non-existent.

When the House is done gathering evidence.

No. You're lying. The investigation originated from DNC leaker Eric Ciaramella's planned attack. But don't worry about Ciaramella, either. He'll testify at trial by Republican rules and we'll get to the bottom of the whole thing. I'm sure that's what you want.

Now, let's get to your ex-wife comparison. Bogus. Plenty of cases get thrown out because of the fruit of the poisonous tree legal concept. Americans are quite familiar with it. And once again, don't worry. That will all come out when Republicans take over the narrative and rules and proceed with trial. I'm sure you'll be very pleased with it all, right?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Again you have failed to refute the whistleblower complaint or any testimony corroborating it. You are merely stating you don't like the people who are testifying. You aren't refuting anything they said.

I don't need to refute anything. People who prosecute have the burden of proof.

 

[ObamacareForever]

No. You're lying. The investigation originated from DNC leaker Eric Ciaramella's planned attack. But don't worry about Ciaramella, either. He'll testify at trial by Republican rules and we'll get to the bottom of the whole thing. I'm sure that's what you want.

Now, let's get to your ex-wife comparison. Bogus. Plenty of cases get thrown out because of the fruit of the poisonous tree legal concept. Americans are quite familiar with it. And once again, don't worry. That will all come out when Republicans take over the narrative and rules and proceed with trial. I'm sure you'll be very pleased with it all, right?

"Fruit of the poisonous tree" refers to evidence that was gathered illegally.
Nothing the whistleblower did was illegal. None of the evidence gathers by the house has been illegal. Wishing Trump gets off on a technicality isn't going to save Trump, when you have boatloads of lawyers who have been involved since the beginning telling everyone the right/legal way to proceed.