ObamacareForever
Senator
Because C02 is the variable that currently causing sea levels to rise.Do why are climate change pimps babbling about sea level rise due to CO2 levels rising?
Because C02 is the variable that currently causing sea levels to rise.Do why are climate change pimps babbling about sea level rise due to CO2 levels rising?
Currently. So it wasn't in the past? That seems odd.Because C02 is the variable that currently causing sea levels to rise.
No, CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affecting global temperatures and global sea levels, but that isn't the only factor in either of those. It a vast oversimplication to sayCurrently. So it wasn't in the past? That seems odd.
Wow, so sea level floors have stopped moving. Let me guess... they stopped moving right around the time the internal combustion engine was developed?No, CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affecting global temperatures and global sea levels, but that isn't the only factor in either of those. It a vast oversimplication to say
Sea Level=CO2 levels*constant.
For starters, the sea floor level affects the sea level. Normal geological forces, like erosion and tectonic movements affect the sea floor level.
Sea level= co2 levels*constant+sea floor*different constant+other factors multiplied by other constants i will skip over for brevity's sake.
Co2 and sea floor levels are variables. Either one or both could be moving. Currently it's the co2 doing the moving.
Certainly. That's the nature of a scientifically-derived belief (as opposed to the denialist quasi-religious faith): it depends on real-world events for support, and thus can theoretically be disrupted by real world events.So is there any weather event, or series of weather events, that would disprove climate change?
Yes, if only it stopped here it would almost (not quite because of the superstores and increasing epidemics) be a net positive.See? Another good thing about global warming.
Again, I'm not an expert on the mechanisms. But thermal expansion and ice melt are causing sea levels to rise.Do why are climate change pimps babbling about sea level rise due to CO2 levels rising?
Where is the evidence?Climate cult member: when caught, just deny deny deny!
Obviously I was referring to the stable levels of the past several thousand years.Pre-industrial levels? You mean like when CO2 levels, according to you were as high as they are now 100,000 years ago? That's pre-industrial, right? Why isn't Florida underwater?
So the sea level is highest near the shore where it's shallow right?No, CO2 levels in the atmosphere were affecting global temperatures and global sea levels, but that isn't the only factor in either of those. It a vast oversimplication to say
Sea Level=CO2 levels*constant.
For starters, the sea floor level affects the sea level. Normal geological forces, like erosion and tectonic movements affect the sea floor level.
Sea level= co2 levels*constant+sea floor*different constant+other factors multiplied by other constants i will skip over for brevity's sake.
Co2 and sea floor levels are variables. Either one or both could be moving. Currently it's the co2 doing the moving.
Droughts ... thought to be caused or exacerbated by global warming ... lead to fights over water and food, and to rural refugees crowding cities, straining their infrastructures, coming into cultural conflict with city dwellers, and creating the critical mass to launch rebellions.Specifically, why are these wars in part attributed to climate change?
Wow, where did this happen? Lemme guess... in places where they've been fighting for years already, right?Droughts ... thought to be caused
or exacerbated by global warming ... lead to fights over water and food, and to rural refugees crowding cities, straining their infrastructures, coming into cultural conflict with city dwellers, and creating the critical mass to launch rebellions.
It wasn't obvious to me. 100,000 years ago is pre-industrial, is it not?Obviously I was referring to the stable levels of the past several thousand years.
Syria wasn't fighting for years before the civil war there started. Sudan/S. Sudan was but not along the fault lines of the new conflicts.Wow, where did this happen? Lemme guess... in places where they've been fighting for years already, right?
Your denials.Where is the evidence?
No, we don't want it to stop here. More global warming will mean more land can be farmed, food grown and the poor fed. You DO care about the poor, don't you?Yes, if only it stopped here it would almost (not quite because of the superstores and increasing epidemics) be a net positive.
What about tectonic plate movement?Again, I'm not an expert on the mechanisms. But thermal expansion and ice melt are causing sea levels to rise.
Agronomists say otherwise ... they say crop food production peaks at about 2*C above mid-20th century average levels (we're at 1* now and will overshoot 2* even with Paris Accords goals met and declines sharply with additional warming. And nutritional quality of food starts to decline in a hot, high-CO2 world.No, we don't want it to stop here. More global warming will mean more land can be farmed, food grown and the poor fed. You DO care about the poor, don't you?
My understanding is that that generally occurs over millions of years. Not single years. Now I understand that there are earthquakes in which plates can move several inches in a few seconds. But doubtful that would cause permanent sea level rise except by causing ice masses to shear off.What about tectonic plate movement?
Which agronomists are these? The ones pushing to feed at the trough for more bucks to study the issue, right? C'mon, admit the truth. Just this once. I won't tell anyone. I promise.Agronomists say otherwise ... they say crop food production peaks at about 2*C above mid-20th century average levels (we're at 1* now and will overshoot 2* even with Paris Accords goals met and declines sharply with additional warming. And nutritional quality of food starts to decline in a hot, high-CO2 world.