New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Remember this about Democrats

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
The Democrat Party has gone to the dogs.........and that is an insult to dogs.
Their lexicon seems to be filled only with words like lying, cheating, stealing, deception, deceit and the like.
 

Jen

Senator
Their lexicon seems to be filled only with words like lying, cheating, stealing, deception, deceit and the like.
When the woman they plan to nominate is known as a "Liar", how can they expect to have anyone's trust?

When they allow Hillary to commit crimes worse than what took down General Petraeus's career totally ...........and they don't blink an eye at her giving away top secrets of this country............ It's obvious. The Democrat Party is one of traitors to our great nation.

Democrats booing God at their DNC..........was just the beginning.
 

Jen

Senator
The Leader of the Democrat Party is not known for her truth-telling.
Whether Democrats realize it or not, having a pathological liar as their leader condemns all of them to being seen as liars. I have posted that I consider all Leftists to be dishonest.

This is why. If they want this liar for president, then they are with her : liars.

 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Good thread, @Jen, but the LWers are proving they are conniving, deceitful people without a shred of dignity nor integrity on your other thread about lying Democrats.
 

Barbella

Senator
Good thread, @Jen, but the LWers are proving they are conniving, deceitful people without a shred of dignity nor integrity on your other thread about lying Democrats.
The majority of left wingers are spoiled brats whose parents never told them "no". They seem to think the world owes them, and they "deserve" to be GIVEN what they want. When things don't go their way they throw hissy fits of epic proportions, going as far as they need to go to get their way... And that includes non-stop lying, cheating, and much, much worse.

No moral compass whatsoever.

The few lefties who actually DO have some integrity and honesty are utterly delusional and blind to reality.
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
The majority of left wingers are spoiled brats whose parents never told them "no". They seem to think the world owes them, and they "deserve" to be GIVEN what they want. When things don't go their way they throw hissy fits of epic proportions, going as far as they need to go to get their way... And that includes non-stop lying, cheating, and much, much worse.

No moral compass whatsoever.

The few lefties who actually DO have some integrity and honesty are utterly delusional and blind to reality.
Unfortunately, it's very few who have some integrity and honesty. The most vocal ones are the complete opposite and, as posts on the other thread are proving, decidedly dishonest.

What is odd, IMO, is how they justify this dishonesty and, in some cases, are even proud of it.
 

Barbella

Senator
Unfortunately, it's very few who have some integrity and honesty. The most vocal ones are the complete opposite and, as posts on the other thread are proving, decidedly dishonest.

What is odd, IMO, is how they justify this dishonesty and, in some cases, are even proud of it.
Sooner or later, their b.s. Is going to bite them in the ass, big time. Unfortunately, it's likely that the rest of us will pay the price...
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Sooner or later, their b.s. Is going to bite them in the ass, big time. Unfortunately, it's likely that the rest of us will pay the price...
Agreed 100% on both points.

The fact even most of Hillary's fans don't trust her honesty proves there are cracks in the wall of what passes for modern American liberalism.

The lying democrat thread reveals the inherent dishonesty in many LW viewpoints. They see nothing wrong with lying, stealing or making false accusations.
 

JuliefromOhio

President
Supporting Member
Well, God gave the Democrats Barack Obama, a smart, charismatic, decent man and superb politician. Thank you, God.

Why did God smite the GOP by giving your party losers?
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Well, God gave the Democrats Barack Obama, a smart, charismatic, decent man and superb politician. Thank you, God.

Why did God smite the GOP by giving your party losers?
Aren't you an atheist? Oh, wait, you're mocking God and believers. That fits.
 

Addy

Rebuild With Biden!
Aren't you an atheist? Oh, wait, you're mocking God and believers. That fits.
Max... you must not have seen the billboard above with George Burns portraying God...That's a winner according to you and it's making fun of God. imo
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Max... you must not have seen the billboard above with George Burns portraying God...That's a winner according to you and it's making fun of God. imo
I liked George Burns as God. I though he a good job at it. Same for Morgan Freeman for that matter.

OTOH, Julie is clearing mocking the religious beliefs of others whereas both Burns and Freeman emphasized the essence of God.
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Regarding Democrats booing God: https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/the-city-gates.cfm?id=402
Thousands of bloggers are reporting this morning that delegates at the Democratic convention in Charlotte booed when God was reintroduced into their party’s platform. That’s not entirely accurate. But the true story does not reflect any better on the Democratic Party.


This Breitbart report has the story right, I think. The boos from the floor were aimed at Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who was running the convention at the time, and asked for three separate voice votes on the amendment that restored a mention of God. On the 3rd vote, Villaigosa ruled that the “Ayes” had won—by a two-thirds majority.

That ruling from the chair was an obvious abuse of power. It was impossible to say, simply from the volume of voices, whether the “Ayes” outnumbered the “Nays.” To assert that the “Ayes” predominated by a 2-to-1 margin was simply absurd. Quite understandably, many delegates objected to the ruling. So their boos were aimed at Villaraigosa, not at God.

But it’s not quite that simple. This vote didn’t occur in a vacuum. In drafting the original platform, Democratic leaders had removed references to God (and to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel). They didn’t merely forget to mention God; in updating previous party platforms, they made a conscious decision to remove Him. When that decision was brought to the attention of ordinary American voters, outside the orbit of the Democratic Party apparatchiks, it was unpopular. It didn’t play in Peoria. Belatedly, the Democratic leaders realized that they should put God back in the picture. So an amendment to the platform was place on the convention’s agenda.

And here’s where things get interesting: That amendment was controversial! Quite a few delegates opposed the mention of God. Some, no doubt, were primarily concerned about the mention of Jerusalem. Party leaders might have simplified matters by introducing two separate amendments: one to restore a mention of God, the other to name Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. But that tactic would not have suited the purposes of the party strategists. They didn’t want an open debate on God (or on Jersualem) during the convention. They didn’t want to give American voters the opportunity to see just how radical the Democratic party has become. They wanted the amendment approved quickly.

Villaraigosa did his part, pronouncing the amendments victorious at a time when any sentient observer realized that their passage was in doubt. He might have called for a ballot vote, but that could have proved embarrassing. The Breitbart account captures the moment:

And Villaraigosa was lying, in any case--there is no way that the voice vote had passed. Opponents stood up and protested, waving and shouting. The fix was in. The Democratic leadership had to ram a mention of God and a mention of Jerusalem through, violating their own rules, to avoid the fallout within their own ranks.

Today we don’t know whether or not a majority of participants at the Democratic convention actually objected to mentioning God in the party’s platform. The party leadership didn’t want us to know.
 

Constitutional Sheepdog

][][][%er!!!!!!!
Well, God gave the Democrats Barack Obama, a smart, charismatic, decent man and superb politician. Thank you, God.

Why did God smite the GOP by giving your party losers?
2 Thessalonians 2:11
The Man of Sin
10and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. 11For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false,12in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.
 
Well, the party does support rational thinking and dealing with reality rather than hoping Jesus comes back to save us all....I am glad they booed it, God has no part in a secular government. You could look it up.
 
Top