New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Republicans vote for a cover up on all documents and witnesses.

Colorforms

Senator
The House has SOLE POWER in regards to impeachment, not the courts, so says the highest law in the land, the Constitution.

It was a settled matter BEFORE Washington was even POTUS.
They do, but that is a completely separate issue as to whether or not the president is obligated to turn over information demanded by the house.
 

Spamature

President
They do, but that is a completely separate issue as to whether or not the president is obligated to turn over information demanded by the house.
Nixon already tried that an it was shot down by the SCOTUS for that very reason.
The courts have no role other than the one Roberts is filling now by presiding over the trial.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Nixon already tried that an it was shot down by the SCOTUS for that very reason.
The courts have no role other than the one Roberts is filling now by presiding over the trial.
Ah, you mean the SCOTUS was allowed to make a ruling with Nixon? Surprise surprise. :)
 

Spamature

President
Ah, you mean the SCOTUS was allowed to make a ruling with Nixon? Surprise surprise. :)
Yeah but at that point he was fighting his own DOJ to hide evidence figuring in his upcoming impeachment.

Again:

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that resulted in a unanimous decision against President Richard Nixon, ordering him to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials to a federal district court. Issued on July 24, 1974, the decision was important to the late stages of the Watergate scandal, when there was an ongoing impeachment process against Richard Nixon. United States v. Nixon is considered a crucial precedent limiting the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege.

Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion for a unanimous court, joined by Justices William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun and Lewis F. Powell. Burger, Blackmun, and Powell were appointed to the Court by Nixon during his first term. Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General
.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Yeah but at that point he was fighting his own DOJ to hide evidence figuring in his upcoming impeachment.

Again:

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that resulted in a unanimous decision against President Richard Nixon, ordering him to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials to a federal district court. Issued on July 24, 1974, the decision was important to the late stages of the Watergate scandal, when there was an ongoing impeachment process against Richard Nixon. United States v. Nixon is considered a crucial precedent limiting the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege.

Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion for a unanimous court, joined by Justices William O. Douglas, William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun and Lewis F. Powell. Burger, Blackmun, and Powell were appointed to the Court by Nixon during his first term. Associate Justice William Rehnquist recused himself as he had previously served in the Nixon administration as an Assistant Attorney General
.
Right? Still has nothing to do with Trump. The SCOTUS still has to rule on his use of executive privilege.
 

Spamature

President
Right? Still has nothing to do with Trump. The SCOTUS still has to rule on his use of executive privilege.
Why ?
Because Trump isn't a president and this isn't constitutional matter which the SCOTUS is supposed to settle once and for all with their rulings ?
 

Spamature

President
Because the ruling applied to Nixon. The SCOTUS never barred the use of executive privilege.
Executive privilege is exactly what they ruled on. Nixon tried to use it to cover up evidence against him and he lost unanimously.

What you are saying is that if poisoning people with your lemonade stand is ruled illegal for you. I can go into court and say well it is only illegal for Colorforms to kill people that way. You didn't rule that I couldn't poison people with my lemonade stand.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Executive privilege is exactly what they ruled on. Nixon tried to use it to cover up evidence against him and he lost unanimously.

What you are saying is that if poisoning people with your lemonade stand is ruled illegal for you. I can go into court and say well it is only illegal for Colorforms to kill people that way. You didn't rule that I couldn't poison people with my lemonade stand.
No, Nixon's USE of executive privilege is what they ruled on.

In other words, just because the SCOTUS says you can't poison people with your lemonade, that doesn't mean I don't get to sell lemonade.
 

Spamature

President
No, Nixon's USE of executive privilege is what they ruled on.

In other words, just because the SCOTUS says you can't poison people with your lemonade, that doesn't mean I don't get to sell lemonade.
But here your lemonade is poison.

Because just like Nixon, Trump is withholding evidence directly related to the charges against him in an attempt to shield himself from prosecution.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
That is a fuqing LIE.

Republicans have no problem calling RELEVANT witnesses. There are three.

Hunter the crack head
Quid Pro Quo Joe
and Adam Schittstain.

They are the ONLY relevant witnesses that have anything of substance to add. Everyone else is just an opinion.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
Relevant to what? Certainly not Trump's pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation. Not to Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine and his failure to inform congress as mandated by the law. Perhaps relevant to Trump's need for help in the 2020 election.

The people relevant to those issues are Mulvaney, Bolton, Esper, Giuliani and Pompeo....
Anyone who thinks as you do is a clown.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Relevant to what? Certainly not Trump's pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation. Not to Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine and his failure to inform congress as mandated by the law. Perhaps relevant to Trump's need for help in the 2020 election.

The people relevant to those issues are Mulvaney, Bolton, Esper, Giuliani and Pompeo....
Anyone who thinks as you do is a clown.

Why inform Congress if it was delivered 19 days before it was due ?

Delivered Sept 11
Due September 30

Whoops
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
What court was being asked to rule on obstruction? The issue is before the senate.
Leftists like to think silly things like Due Process, The Constitution or Going to the Courts is Obstruction LOL

Pelosi put the cart before the horse. Ad now you are left with a pile of s*** in your hands. Enjoy !
 
Top