New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Republicans vote for a cover up on all documents and witnesses.

middleview

President
Supporting Member
This is the first time in history any president is alleged – has been impeached without the articles alleging any criminal conduct at all, without alleging any federal crime was violated

So Impeachment Clause doesn't apply LOL
What crime was Andrew Johnson accused of?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Andrew_Johnson

The house voted on hearings for impeachment, voted on articles of impeachment...Yes, I'd say it was an impeachment and governed by the impeachment clause....
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Which was butthurt/political as well LOL At least you admit it ! Thanks!
Your post
This is the first time in history any president is alleged – has been impeached without the articles alleging any criminal conduct at all, without alleging any federal crime was violated

Was wrong.
 

reason10

Governor
Relevant to what?
The phone call. Crackhead and Quid Pro Quo's names were mentioned. They are now relevant to the case.


Certainly not Trump's pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation.

Trump didn't put pressure on Ukraine. The phone call reveals that it was a very friendly and legal conversation. That's just an Adam Schiff lie.


Not to Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine and his failure to inform congress as mandated by the law.

It was Obama who held up military aid to Ukraine. Trump gave Ukraine Javelin missiles which can be used to take down Russian tanks. I've already produced proof of that.

Perhaps relevant to Trump's need for help in the 2020 election.

Trump is not going to need help. He didn't need help before the phone call. The clown car was spouting off Edited/Communist garbage and giving the Republicans campaign slogans, worse than Mondale.



The people relevant to those issues are Mulvaney, Bolton, Esper, Giuliani and Pompeo....
Anyone who thinks as you do is a clown.


None of those guys were in the room when Trump made the call. Guiliani was mentioned in the call, so he probably has relevant testimony, mostly to validate the fact that Quid Pro Quo Joe was committing extortion.

People who think as I do have jobs and pay taxes so you don't have to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I'll take that as your concession. :)
Your ability to maintain a train of thought is either at the level of a child or you are purposely trolling. You've had an ongoing conversation with others here about the court vs the house making the determination of obstruction. The impeachment clause makes no such distinction. Boom...you lose.
 

Spamature

President
That is a fuqing LIE.

Republicans have no problem calling RELEVANT witnesses. There are three.

Hunter the crack head
Quid Pro Quo Joe
and Adam Schittstain.

They are the ONLY relevant witnesses that have anything of substance to add. Everyone else is just an opinion.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
And none of the people in his administration who carried out the crime are RELEVANT witnesses in your in your completely insane foolishness ?

See how dishonest you wingers are.

How can you even stand yourselves ?
 

reason10

Governor
Trump cult: Laws, shmaws.

;-)
Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schiff and the other criminal House managers did last week.

Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your edited feelings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Relevant to what?
The phone call. Crackhead and Quid Pro Quo's names were mentioned. They are now relevant to the case.


Certainly not Trump's pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation.

Trump didn't put pressure on Ukraine. The phone call reveals that it was a very friendly and LEGAL conversation. That's just an Adam Schittstain LIE.


Not to Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine and his failure to inform congress as mandated by the law.

It was OBAMA who held up military aid to Ukraine. Trump gave Ukraine Javelin missiles which can be used to take down Russian tanks. I've already produced proof of that.

Perhaps relevant to Trump's need for help in the 2020 election.

Trump is not going to need help. He didn't need help before the phone call. The clown car was spouting off Nazi/Communist garbage and giving the Republicans campaign slogans, worse than Mondale.



The people relevant to those issues are Mulvaney, Bolton, Esper, Giuliani and Pompeo....
Anyone who thinks as you do is a clown.


None of those guys were in the room when Trump made the call. Guiliani was mentioned in the call, so he probably has relevant testimony, mostly to validate the fact that Quid Pro Quo Joe was committing EXTORTION.

People who think as I do have jobs and pay taxes so you don't have to.
Joe and Hunter were not present during any conversation between Trump and his mob, especially not related to his abuse of power in holding up a congressional appropriation.
The phone call is not the totality of the issue. Parnas was told by Giuliani back in May to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into the Bidens. Bolton called it a "drug deal". Clearly he knew something about it and advised Williams and others to tell the lawyers about it.

Nobody said the phone call was illegal. It is evidence that Trump was using aid to get "a favor".

For Obama to have put a hold on aid it would have to have been appropriated by Congress. In fact we gave Ukraine quite a bit of aid. Armored humvees and counter battery radar would be two very significant pieces of gear.

By the way...WTF was Trump doing telling Ukraine to talk to Rudy, his personal lawyer?
Rudy was running around conducting foreign policy as if he were actually appointed and confirmed by Congress. Who is paying that pig?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.

Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.
Your hackery is boring.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.

Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.
Gee...what laws did they break? Be specific.
 

Spamature

President
Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.

Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.
He is sinless or so says a member of the Cult of the Cheetos Jesus.

There is no point in trying to reason with you folks.

He is your teabagger messiah and you will never turn away from him.

I get it.
 
Top