Colorforms
Senator
Then it should be a quick ruling. Funny that it's being ruled on if Trump never invoked it. It's like magic.Trump didn’t even invoke executive privilege.
Truly deplorable.
Then it should be a quick ruling. Funny that it's being ruled on if Trump never invoked it. It's like magic.Trump didn’t even invoke executive privilege.
Truly deplorable.
What crime was Andrew Johnson accused of?This is the first time in history any president is alleged – has been impeached without the articles alleging any criminal conduct at all, without alleging any federal crime was violated
So Impeachment Clause doesn't apply LOL
What crime was Andrew Johnson accused of?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Andrew_Johnson
The house voted on hearings for impeachment, voted on articles of impeachment...Yes, I'd say it was an impeachment and governed by the impeachment clause....
Article 1: Section 2.The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
And?
Your postWhich was butthurt/political as well LOL At least you admit it ! Thanks!
Think on it a bit...maybe it will come to you.And?
So you don't know what you're talking about either?Think on it a bit...maybe it will come to you.
I'm not going to spend time explaining the simple stuff to you. The game you play is boring and not meant to add to the conversation.So you don't know what you're talking about either?
Figures.
I'll take that as your concession.I'm not going to spend time explaining the simple stuff to you. The game you play is boring and not meant to add to the conversation.
The law says Trump has 15 days to notify congress of a hold on appropriations.Why inform Congress if it was delivered 19 days before it was due ?
Delivered Sept 11
Due September 30
Whoops
Your ability to maintain a train of thought is either at the level of a child or you are purposely trolling. You've had an ongoing conversation with others here about the court vs the house making the determination of obstruction. The impeachment clause makes no such distinction. Boom...you lose.I'll take that as your concession.
Trump cult: Laws, shmaws.The law says Trump has 15 days to notify congress of a hold on appropriations.
And none of the people in his administration who carried out the crime are RELEVANT witnesses in your in your completely insane foolishness ?That is a fuqing LIE.
Republicans have no problem calling RELEVANT witnesses. There are three.
Hunter the crack head
Quid Pro Quo Joe
and Adam Schittstain.
They are the ONLY relevant witnesses that have anything of substance to add. Everyone else is just an opinion.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schiff and the other criminal House managers did last week.Trump cult: Laws, shmaws.
;-)
Joe and Hunter were not present during any conversation between Trump and his mob, especially not related to his abuse of power in holding up a congressional appropriation.Relevant to what?
The phone call. Crackhead and Quid Pro Quo's names were mentioned. They are now relevant to the case.
Certainly not Trump's pressure on Ukraine to announce an investigation.
Trump didn't put pressure on Ukraine. The phone call reveals that it was a very friendly and LEGAL conversation. That's just an Adam Schittstain LIE.
Not to Trump's hold on military aid to Ukraine and his failure to inform congress as mandated by the law.
It was OBAMA who held up military aid to Ukraine. Trump gave Ukraine Javelin missiles which can be used to take down Russian tanks. I've already produced proof of that.
Perhaps relevant to Trump's need for help in the 2020 election.
Trump is not going to need help. He didn't need help before the phone call. The clown car was spouting off Nazi/Communist garbage and giving the Republicans campaign slogans, worse than Mondale.
The people relevant to those issues are Mulvaney, Bolton, Esper, Giuliani and Pompeo....
Anyone who thinks as you do is a clown.
None of those guys were in the room when Trump made the call. Guiliani was mentioned in the call, so he probably has relevant testimony, mostly to validate the fact that Quid Pro Quo Joe was committing EXTORTION.
People who think as I do have jobs and pay taxes so you don't have to.
Your hackery is boring.Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.
Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.
Gee...what laws did they break? Be specific.Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.
Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.
He is sinless or so says a member of the Cult of the Cheetos Jesus.Only Trump's critics break the law, as Schittstain and the other criminal House managers did last week.
Trump has the law on his side. He hasn't broken any laws.
Those are the facts, and facts don't care about your dumbass feelings.