New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Republicans vote for a cover up on all documents and witnesses.

Spamature

President
Deplorable is as Deplorables are !

They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.

America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Deplorable is as Deplorables are !

They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.

America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.

And reject the reactionary drama queens like you and me :)

Wanted those documents?? House should have taken their time, and gotten them

Sorry that's stuck up your rear.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
Deplorable is as Deplorables are !

They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.

America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.
The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.

Now the tables turn in the Senate, with the Republicans holding the majority.

The almost too predictable result?

Squawk squawk!!
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.

Now the tables turn in the Senate, with the Republicans holding the majority.

The almost too predictable result?

Squawk squawk!!
Consider how absurd that position is...

The only witnesses called by the House were Trump’s own people - not a Dem operative among them - and you bitch about their “fairness.”
 

Spamature

President
And reject the reactionary drama queens like you and me :)

Wanted those documents?? House should have taken their time, and gotten them

Sorry that's stuck up your rear.
I think you have a poor understanding of what they did, Trumpie.

They blocked the documents the House already has and are trying to submit.

They don't want ANY evidence to be presented the prosecution of you teabagger messiah.

Keep trying to defend the deplorable, like a Deplorable would.
 

Spamature

President
The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.

Now the tables turn in the Senate, with the Republicans holding the majority.

The almost too predictable result?

Squawk squawk!!

Would defend a trial where none of the evidence collected by a police investigation or documents related to the crime could be admitted ? Do you believe that should be the legal standard ?

Yes or No ?
 

Dino

Russian Asset
Would defend a trial where none of the evidence collected by a police investigation or documents related to the crime could be admitted ? Do you believe that should be the legal standard ?

Yes or No ?
The Democrats has a chance to collect evidence and witness testimony and subpoena witnesses from both sides. They chose not to. Nadler said they didn’t need to
Now the Democrats being their nothing-burger case to the Senate and want to cry foul because the process won’t be precisely what they wish for.
I don’t feel bad, not one bit. They rushed through a garbage falsehood and not should reap the consequences.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
A very Republican political move. Unlike any legitimate trial in all of US history.
All 53 GOP senators have thus far voted in lockstep against the requests to allow witnesses or document subpoenas for Moscow Mitch’s show trial.

The electorate should judge them harshly. The only hope for reforming these GOP swine is voting them out of office when they aid and abet coverup schemes.
 
All 53 GOP senators have thus far voted in lockstep against the requests to allow witnesses or document subpoenas for Moscow Mitch’s show trial.

The electorate should judge them harshly. The only hope for reforming these GOP swine is voting them out of office when they aid and abet coverup schemes.
For the less corrupt party?
 

Spamature

President
The Democrats has a chance to collect evidence and witness testimony and subpoena witnesses from both sides. They chose not to. Nadler said they didn’t need to
Now the Democrats being their nothing-burger case to the Senate and want to cry foul because the process won’t be precisely what they wish for.
I don’t feel bad, not one bit. They rushed through a garbage falsehood and not should reap the consequences.
You didn't answer the questions.

Here is another chance to do so.

Would defend a trial where none of the evidence collected by a police investigation or documents related to the crime could be admitted ? Do you believe that should be the legal standard ?
 
Top