Deplorable is as Deplorables are !
They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.
America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.
The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.Deplorable is as Deplorables are !
They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.
America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.
Documents and witnesses were supposed to be deposed in the house. It's not a republican cover up, it's democrat incompetence.Deplorable is as Deplorables are !
They always say the cover up is usually worse than the crime.
America will remember what they did this day, on the next election day.
Consider how absurd that position is...The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.
Now the tables turn in the Senate, with the Republicans holding the majority.
The almost too predictable result?
Squawk squawk!!
That would have been great, but Trump blocked it through his lawless obstruction.Documents and witnesses were supposed to be deposed in the house. It's not a republican cover up, it's democrat incompetence.
I think you have a poor understanding of what they did, Trumpie.And reject the reactionary drama queens like you and me
Wanted those documents?? House should have taken their time, and gotten them
Sorry that's stuck up your rear.
The House majority had their one-sided partisan vote for how things were handled in the House. Republicans squawked because it wasn’t fair to them.
Now the tables turn in the Senate, with the Republicans holding the majority.
The almost too predictable result?
Squawk squawk!!
They aren't allowing the evidence already gathered by the House.Documents and witnesses were supposed to be deposed in the house. It's not a republican cover up, it's democrat incompetence.
A very Republican political move. Unlike any legitimate trial in all of US history.A very american political move.
The Democrats has a chance to collect evidence and witness testimony and subpoena witnesses from both sides. They chose not to. Nadler said they didn’t need toWould defend a trial where none of the evidence collected by a police investigation or documents related to the crime could be admitted ? Do you believe that should be the legal standard ?
Yes or No ?
All 53 GOP senators have thus far voted in lockstep against the requests to allow witnesses or document subpoenas for Moscow Mitch’s show trial.A very Republican political move. Unlike any legitimate trial in all of US history.
We've had plenty of illegitimate trials in america.A very Republican political move. Unlike any legitimate trial in all of US history.
For the less corrupt party?All 53 GOP senators have thus far voted in lockstep against the requests to allow witnesses or document subpoenas for Moscow Mitch’s show trial.
The electorate should judge them harshly. The only hope for reforming these GOP swine is voting them out of office when they aid and abet coverup schemes.
Indeed.For the less corrupt party?
Slightly = "winner".Indeed.
You didn't answer the questions.The Democrats has a chance to collect evidence and witness testimony and subpoena witnesses from both sides. They chose not to. Nadler said they didn’t need to
Now the Democrats being their nothing-burger case to the Senate and want to cry foul because the process won’t be precisely what they wish for.
I don’t feel bad, not one bit. They rushed through a garbage falsehood and not should reap the consequences.
No. That would be a disgrace.You didn't answer the questions.
Here is another chance to do so.
Would defend a trial where none of the evidence collected by a police investigation or documents related to the crime could be admitted ? Do you believe that should be the legal standard ?