New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Rising sea levels! Man made calamity! Emissions! Cow farts!

Barbella

Senator
We are all going to die!!!

Aug. 30 (UPI) -- Scientists have discovered ancient deposits in the Artà Cave on the island of Mallorca that suggest sea levels 3.5 to 4 million years ago were more than 50 feet higher than they are today.

The data suggests sea levels rose as high as 50 feet above present day sea levels.

Previous studies have found evidence that Earth's average temperature was between 2 and 3 degrees Celsius warmer than today's climate during the middle of the Pliocene -- called the mid-Piacenzian Warm Period, which persisted from 3.2 to 3 million years ago.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.upi.com/amp/Science_News/2019/08/30/Cave-deposits-suggest-Earth-experienced-dramatic-sea-level-rise-4-million-years-ago/5611567187738/
 

Spamature

President
We are all going to die!!!

Aug. 30 (UPI) -- Scientists have discovered ancient deposits in the Artà Cave on the island of Mallorca that suggest sea levels 3.5 to 4 million years ago were more than 50 feet higher than they are today.

The data suggests sea levels rose as high as 50 feet above present day sea levels.

Previous studies have found evidence that Earth's average temperature was between 2 and 3 degrees Celsius warmer than today's climate during the middle of the Pliocene -- called the mid-Piacenzian Warm Period, which persisted from 3.2 to 3 million years ago.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.upi.com/amp/Science_News/2019/08/30/Cave-deposits-suggest-Earth-experienced-dramatic-sea-level-rise-4-million-years-ago/5611567187738/
Most cow methane comes from burbs, not farts.
 

Spamature

President
expert fart sniffer are ya...………………….ocean use to be 125 miles closer to me than it is today as op points out facts
4 million yrs ago, genius, readers must think those cow farts have effected your mind.
No worries.
I know you have always been this stupid.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Huh, so if the Earth suddenly warms 2-3 degrees or more over the course of decades, what can we expect.
It would be 90* instead of 88* today...…………….

IF biggest word in the world...………...if cow farts were as progs claim Kansas wouldn't be here...……...you ever been to Kansas?
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
Expect it being 90* instead of 88* today...…………….

IF biggest word in the world...………...if cow farts were as progs claim Kansas wouldn't be here...……...you ever been to Kansas?
No, global warming doesn’t mean uniform local warming. It means a huge influx of energy that has chaotic effects on weather systems exacerbating all sorts of extreme weather.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
'A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures...
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”'

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html

"Abstract. In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature."

"Conclusion
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf [Italics added]

IPCC = Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
AR5 = IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report on the state of knowledge concerning climate change
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Wait. If we are causing climates to change- certainly we can stop it- right ?

That means when there's a drought we can whip up the US GOVT ANTI DROUGHT machine and end it right ?

OR better yet- we can have the north and midwest NOT have a winter to save hundreds of millions of people from heating bills !!!!

Oh that sounds silly. :rolleyes:
 

Barbella

Senator
'A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures...
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”'

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html

"Abstract. In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature."

"Conclusion
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf [Italics added]

IPCC = Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
AR5 = IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report on the state of knowledge concerning climate change
Thank you.
 

EatTheRich

President
'A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures...
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”'

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html

"Abstract. In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature."

"Conclusion
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature."

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf [Italics added]

IPCC = Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
AR5 = IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report on the state of knowledge concerning climate change
Natural News! They’re the same folks who say vaccines cause autism and weed cures cancer, right? Obviously only the most reputable “scientists” publish their “research” there.
 

EatTheRich

President
Wait. If we are causing climates to change- certainly we can stop it- right ?

That means when there's a drought we can whip up the US GOVT ANTI DROUGHT machine and end it right ?

OR better yet- we can have the north and midwest NOT have a winter to save hundreds of millions of people from heating bills !!!!

Oh that sounds silly. :rolleyes:
Yup, it sounds silly when you disregard the natural mechanisms of climate change and pretend it is a deliberate process.
 
Top