reason10
Governor
Suburbs are not zoned agricultural. Cows and other livestock are not allowed.Most cow methane comes from burbs, not farts.
Suburbs are usually zoned single family, duplex, or multi family (for apartment buildings and condos.)
Suburbs are not zoned agricultural. Cows and other livestock are not allowed.Most cow methane comes from burbs, not farts.
?????Suburbs are not zoned agricultural. Cows and other livestock are not allowed.
Suburbs are usually zoned single family, duplex, or multi family (for apartment buildings and condos.)
Problem is, scientists today BARELY know anything about nature, about weather, about the climate. And the edited idiots who are pushing manmade climate change aren't even doing any field research. They are reading flawed computer models.Yup, it sounds silly when you disregard the natural mechanisms of climate change and pretend it is a deliberate process.
You said bovine methane comes from the burbs, (as in Suburbs, which intelligent people say.)?????
Who says vaccines cause autism?Natural News! They’re the same folks who say vaccines cause autism and weed cures cancer, right? Obviously only the most reputable “scientists” publish their “research” there.
Scientists actually know quite a lot about nature and about climatology. Even 30 years ago they did, which is why they confidently made bold predictions of climate change unlike anything the world has seen in thousands of years, and then found these predictions confirmed in precise detail.Problem is, scientists today BARELY know anything about nature, about weather, about the climate. And the fcking idiots who are pushing manmade climate change aren't even doing any field research. They are reading flawed computer models.
A bunch of teenagers playing Grand Theft Auto on a Playstation would be more accurate.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-05-autism-mercury-thimerosal-and-vaccines-natural-news-releases-collection-of-scientific-knowledge-thats-been-suppressed.htmlWho says vaccines cause autism?
(Everybody knows autism is the result of registering and voting Democrat)
Weed cures cancer?
Seriously?
Show me where Natural News made either such claim.
(You've been caught lying and making shitt up again.)
Brilliant. When exactly did you figure that one out, genius? *chuckles*No. There were nothing man made 4 mil yrs ago.
There has been more change in the last 50 years than in the prior 12,000, it already costs the world tens of thousands of lives, and millions of dollars, every year, and if we stop adding net carbon now, temperatures may rise 3 times as much as they already have within the next 100 years ... if we are lucky, and it looks increasingly likely we won’t be from the Greenland melting, Antarctic melting, methane release, and Amazon burning all happening well ahead of expectations.Brilliant. When exactly did you figure that one out, genius? *chuckles*
So when sea levels were 50 feet higher than today or when they were 400 feet lower (like the last ice age) it was conveniently "natural cycles" but when there has been negligible change in the last 50 years it's now man-ssmade calamity and global crisis?
Oppoo Oo Or oppo ooo
The post also quoted and linked to the original research paper:Natural News! They’re the same folks who say vaccines cause autism and weed cures cancer, right? Obviously only the most reputable “scientists” publish their “research” there.
In the last 12,000 years there was an ICE AGE which wiped out an entire generation of dinosaurs. There was nothing like that in the last 50 years.There has been more change in the last 50 years than in the prior 12,000, it already costs the world tens of thousands of lives, and millions of dollars, every year, and if we stop adding net carbon now, temperatures may rise 3 times as much as they already have within the next 100 years ... if we are lucky, and it looks increasingly likely we won’t be from the Greenland melting, Antarctic melting, methane release, and Amazon burning all happening well ahead of expectations.
Florida is regularly underwater due to tidal flooding. But I don’t think Al Gore (who is not a climate scientist) said anything of the kind.Scientists actually know quite a lot about nature and about climatology.
No they don't. They can't even accurately predict WEATHER, ten days out. They don't even understand climate or climatology.
Even 30 years ago they did, which is why they confidently made bold predictions of climate change unlike anything the world has seen in thousands of years, and then found these predictions confirmed in precise detail.
Algore predicted Florida would be under water by now.
You lose again.
There is “an ice age” now. The last glacial period within that ice age ended 12,000 years ago, there has not been one in the period to which I was referring.In the last 12,000 years there was an ICE AGE which wiped out an entire generation of dinosaurs. There was nothing like that in the last 50 years.
Edited
He said it on a TV news show around 1992. I remember Rush Limbaugh running that clip and having us laugh our asses off.Florida is regularly underwater due to tidal flooding. But I don’t think Al Gore (who is not a climate scientist) said anything of the kind.
The non-avian dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, long before the current ice age (still ongoing) began 2.6 million years ago. When you can pass a 2nd grade science test I might start taking your criticisms of the world’s leading climatologists, physicists, chemists, statisticians, and engineers more seriously.There is “an ice age” now.
Actually, the "little ice age" ended at the beginning of the 20th Century, and the warming that took place was totally natural.
The last glacial period within that ice age ended 12,000 years ago, there has not been one in the period to which I was referring.
What dinosaurs did you have in mind?
All of them. The ICE AGE wiped them all out, which is the only way human life could have survived on this planet.
We are NOT in some current ice age. Glaciers are not reaching the Equator, like the Cryogenian, or "Snowball Earth."The non-avian dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, long before the current ice age (still ongoing) began 2.6 million years ago. When you can pass a 2nd grade science test I might start taking your criticisms of the world’s leading climatologists, physicists, chemists, statisticians, and engineers more seriously.
It is about the speed at which it is taking place, not the current magnitude. You people must be incapable of learning. You talk about over 50 yrs for things that had taken hundreds of thousand of years to happen previously, and you still don't get it.Brilliant. When exactly did you figure that one out, genius? *chuckles*
So when sea levels were 50 feet higher than today or when they were 400 feet lower (like the last ice age) it was conveniently "natural cycles" but when there has been negligible change in the last 50 years it's now man-made calamity and global crisis?
Look up the difference between a glacial period and an ice age. If there is ice at the poles, it is an ice age.We are NOT in some current ice age. Glaciers are not reaching the Equator, like the Cryogenian, or "Snowball Earth."
And I promise you I won't lose sleep over a knowledge-challenged hack like you disagreeing with my facts.