Rudy G sez he will ignore congressional subpoenas

[Bugsy McGurk]

No concession on my part...


Your claim:


Dimwingers took control in the 2018 elections.

Lick your wounds.

April isn’t after the Dems took control of the House?

That’s lame even by your own pitiful standards.

I graciously accept the concession you would provide if you were honest.

;-)

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

You’re pretending that Trump distinguishes between impeachment-related subpoenas and other subpoenas. That’s false, of course. Trump has directed that all congressional subpoenas be ignored. He announced that after the Dems took control of the House. His lawlessness is across the board. Just the way you like it.

That's a blatant lie.

Trump said....and I quote directly from your link...... "We are fighting all the subpoenas."

So tell me how "fighting" subpoenas equates to "ignoring" subpoenas?

Answer = It doesn't.

Ok. Tell your next lie now...

 

[Nostra]

April isn’t after the Dems took control of the House?


;-)

7 months after they took control. You claimed he made the announcement WHEN Dimwingers took control.

Oops!

Keep digging.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

7 months after they took control. You claimed he made the announcement WHEN Dimwingers took control.

Oops!

Keep digging.

You have two lies in that post...

I said “after,” not “when.”

The Dems took control of the House in January. April is 3 months after January, not 7.

OK, tell your next lies now...

 

[Nostra]

I said “after,” not “when.”
.

Dissembling noted.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

That's a blatant lie.

Trump said....and I quote directly from your link...... "We are fighting all the subpoenas."

So tell me how "fighting" subpoenas equates to "ignoring" subpoenas?

Answer = It doesn't.

Ok. Tell your next lie now...

You are reduced to semantical quibbling.

Quite telling.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Dissembling noted.

The most deranged winger liars refer to telling the truth as “dissembling.”

;-)

 

[Spamature]

No surprise here, really. The Trump lawlessness pervades his entire orbit of flunkies...

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/giuliani-comply-congressional-subpoena/story?id=66293635

I bet this one won't ignore his subpoena.

Ex-Rep. Sessions Subpoenaed Over Interactions With Giuliani, Giuliani Associates

Pete Sessions’ knowledge of Mr. Giuliani’s dealings is a primary focus of subpoena

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I bet this one won't ignore his subpoena.

Ex-Rep. Sessions Subpoenaed Over Interactions With Giuliani, Giuliani Associates

Pete Sessions’ knowledge of Mr. Giuliani’s dealings is a primary focus of subpoena

The vise tightens.

;-)

 

[Drumcollie]

No surprise here, really. The Trump lawlessness pervades his entire orbit of flunkies...

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/giuliani-comply-congressional-subpoena/story?id=66293635

Pelosi holds off on vote to authorize impeachment inquiry...so no need to bother.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pelosi-holds-off-on-vote-to-authorize-impeachment-inquiry/ar-AAIP7zD?ocid=spartanntp

 

[Spamature]

The vise tightens.

;-)

The lever has been plunged on the toaster.

Tick Tock !

 

[Drumcollie]

Yes it is. Providing the Trump announcement you doubted.

I graciously accept your concession.

Concession? What??? You have nothing again?

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Rudy G sez he will ignore congressional subpoenas

Good.

 

[Spamature]

Rudy G sez he will ignore congressional subpoenas

Good.

I wonder if Trump thinks his personal lawyers ending up as cell mates is good ?

I do.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

I wonder if Trump thinks his personal lawyers ending up as cell mates is good ?

I do.

Good for you.

 

[Spamature]

Good for you.

Good for America

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

You are reduced to semantical quibbling.

Quite telling.

Nope. Don't think so.

Words have actual meanings. Although it's obvious that doesn't matter to you.

"Fight" does not mean ignore.

You lied.

 

[Nostra]

The most deranged winger liars refer to telling the truth as “dissembling.”

;-)

Dissembling noted again.

 

[EatTheRich]

The WH has already gone on record they will challenge all these sham subpoenas.

If you want subpoena power, impeach. Can't have it both ways.

Next?

It is contempt of Congress to refuse a lawful congressional subpoena whether pursuant to an impeachment or not. Although there is an active impeachment inquiry, the legal status of the subpoenas would be the same regardless.

 

[ObamacareForever]

The WH has already gone on record they will challenge all these sham

He can challenge them from a jail cell beneath congress