New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Schiff to be put under oath?

Boca

Governor
Rep. Elise Stefanik says Adam Schiff should be the first witness Republicans call to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

“The whistleblower should answer questions under oath, but more importantly Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik said.

Sounds reasonable but is it possible?
 
D

Deleted member 21794

Guest
Rep. Elise Stefanik says Adam Schiff should be the first witness Republicans call to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

“The whistleblower should answer questions under oath, but more importantly Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik said.

Sounds reasonable but is it possible?
I can't imagine why it shouldn't be possible, given it appears this *whistleblower* scam is nothing but a coordinated, partisan coup attempt.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Schiff will be witness #1. Should it get that far.

Next wednesdays show is basically the end of this charade.
 

Boca

Governor
Doesn't Schiff have the power to veto any witnesses the republicans call?
Probably, but if he refuses to testify under oath they should walk out and immediately remind people he was the same piece of Schiff that fabricated a fable about what the President said in the phone call and denied that he had met with the whistle blower. Not that those lies are the only ones.
 

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Rep. Elise Stefanik says Adam Schiff should be the first witness Republicans call to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

“The whistleblower should answer questions under oath, but more importantly Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik said.

Sounds reasonable but is it possible?
schiff ought to be taken to the vet and put down.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
Rep. Elise Stefanik says Adam Schiff should be the first witness Republicans call to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

“The whistleblower should answer questions under oath, but more importantly Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik said.

Sounds reasonable but is it possible?
i agree. every time there is an investigation, as part of the investigation, the lead politician in charge of the hearing should be put under oath. like trey gowdy and darrel issa who spent many more years, and many more tax dollars, leading republican investigations that never even charged anyone with a crime, much less convicted anyone of even a misdemeanor.

that is the true judge of a partisan investigation, when years are spent, many investigations going over the same ground wasting so many millions of bucks, and in the end, NOTHING. no charges. no official reprimands. no nothing. just total waste of time and money giving fox and breitbart something to spew each night and brainwash their audience that something must be corrupt or they wouldn't keep investigating the shit out of it.

compare that to the Mueller Report- 32 people indicted and most of them found guilty. 12 Russian agents indicted for hacking into DNC servers at Putin's direction to help Trump and hurt Hillary...

get it? that is how we know it was not a witchhunt, like benghazi and the clinton emails.

and trump is going to be impeached because of the facts concerning his bribery and extortion.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
schiff ought to be taken to the vet and put down.
it is funny when loser trump voters try to act like they belong in the same universe as guys like Schiff. i guess it is envy or maybe just stupidity that makes them think they are fit to even carry his jock, much less try to judge him as if they are even 10% his equal.

but it is funny to watch them attacking him, the same way it would be to watch a retarded gnat attacking a lion.

these trump voters have illusions of adequacy.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
Probably, but if he refuses to testify under oath they should walk out and immediately remind people he was the same piece of Schiff that fabricated a fable about what the President said in the phone call and denied that he had met with the whistle blower. Not that those lies are the only ones.
wrong again. do you even try to tell the truth, or like trump, does that matter at all to you? Schiff clearly said, in his opening remarks trump voters cry about and lie about, that he would paraphrase Trump's phone call, that had been publicly released and everybody knew what is said when he paraphrased it anyway!! but trump voters keep trying to say, because infowars or fox or some other lying media they bow down to and worship, told them Schiff lied about the phone call to make people believe it was naughty!! it is not a lie when you say before you talk about it that you are paraphrasing it, and that the real version is publicly available!!

how can even trump voters keep bringing this silly point up that is so completely stupid and irrelevant- as if it is wrong to make fun of the phone call and paraphrase it?

and even if he had met with the whistleblower that means nothing, but he personally did not. all that matters is everything the whistleblower claimed, that the Trump appointed IG investigated, led to the investigation, and was completely verified by every witness so far with first hand and second hand information and by the phone call and the texts of the diplomats.

that is the bottom line, not goofy shit about paraphrasing a phone call or whether or not anybody told the whistleblower to report to the IG.
 

reason10

Mayor
Rep. Elise Stefanik says Adam Schiff should be the first witness Republicans call to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

“The whistleblower should answer questions under oath, but more importantly Adam Schiff needs to answer questions under oath,” Stefanik said.

Sounds reasonable but is it possible?
It's not possible. That LIAR'S attorney's will never let him get anywhere near a microphone where his testimony is under oath.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
Just in case some here don't look.

not even close..good god do you even know what the facts are? biden wanted a corrupt pro-russian chief prosecutor fired because HE WAS NOT PROSECUTING, NOT BECAUSE HE WAS!! it had nothing to do with burisma or his son or obama deep state or some goofy ass right wing theory of a DNC server being in Ukraine that fooled our military-intelligence experts into believing Russia was the one hacking into our servers!! that is what trump believed because this dumbass John Solomon conspiracy nut spewed that shit on Hannity's show!! biden was the point man for US FOREIGN POLICY THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM PERSONALLY....HE WAS PUBLIC, AS ALL THE VIDEOS YOU TRUMP VOTERS HAVE SEEN....the EU also wanted this Shokin pro-russian conman fired....why do you think the EU would give a shit about what Biden's kid was up to when they demanded this pro-russian, corrupt chief prosecutor Shokin be fired? as the Irish Times clearly said in their report about him being sacked-

EU hails sacking of Ukraine's prosecutor Viktor ... - Irish Times

https://www.irishtimes.com › news › world › europe › eu-hails-sacking-of-...

Mar 29, 2016 - Viktor Shokin, who has been fired as prosecutor general of Ukraine ... prosecutor general and called for a crackdown on corruption, even as the .
 

llovejim

Current Champion
It's not possible. That LIAR'S attorney's will never let him get anywhere near a microphone where his testimony is under oath.
why do trump voters ever cry about OTHER people lying when trump is the biggest known liar in history? why are they so hypocritical only other people lying, if they even are, upset them, but the 12,000 confirmed lies Trump has told since assuming office do not bother them at all?

can anybody say hypocritical goobers? sure. i knew you could.
 

llovejim

Current Champion
As usual, everything you have posted is a LIE.

Biden is guilty of extortion. Trump is innocent.

Biden is not going to be elected president. Trump will be reelected.

TRUMP BEAT HILLARY, PUSSY. GET OVER IT.
wow, way to back up your crazy spew with facts!! good little trump voter!! here is a cookie.
 
Top