so you think Trump's threats were legal?
of course you did. What did Trump mean when he talked about how we used to treat spies?
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
What threats?
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
I'm guessing he meant what he actually said.
You lose.
Report: National security officials shared concerns over Trump and Ukraine prior to Zelensky call
https://news.yahoo.com/report-national-security-officials-shared-000901199.html
And you think that wasn't meant as a threat?
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
Officials said their worries doubled after Trump's call with Zelensky, with one person who had been listening to the conversation
No sources LOL
You keep believing made up shite
How many times will you ignore the evidence posted?
Nutty Cortez
Dummy (D) NY
Newspaper article with no sources, is evidence ?
LOL !!!!!!!!!
How many times were they wrong daily doing the Mueller fiasco?
Nice try...editing the document to make it seem like only one person was listening....Officials said their worries doubled after Trump's call with Zelensky, with one person who had been listening to the conversation
No sources LOL
You keep believing made up shite
Officials said their worries doubled after Trump's call with Zelensky, with one person who had been listening to the conversation "immediately" going to National Security Council legal adviser John Eisenberg to talk to him about the matter.
Quit editing the info to make your opinion work. It just proves how dishonest you are.
How many times were they right? How many times has Trump lied?
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
Do you have evidence it was?And you think that wasn't meant as a threat?
D
Deleted member 21794
Guest
How many times have they been wrong? How many times have they lied? Hey, what happened to "about eight times"? LOL
1. $400 million in military aid is on hold. That information was relayed to top officials in the State department and the Pentagon.
2. "We're ready to buy more Javelin missiles" answered by "we'd like you to do us a favor though" and you think the military equipment needed by Ukraine to defend against Russian troops and equipment was not being traded for an investigation?
The evidence is simply logic. You do not have to hear him say it. The quid pro quo is painfully obvious. The tweets about "withholding military aid" is insane is evidence that others inside Trump's administration see it as Trump looking for help in the election.
Democrats put out the call for someone willing to lie for money and then give them the script. Not hard to hire for that job. They will come forth with all the whistle blowers they need. Easy peasy.
At least one Lefty here on this board has admitted he doesn't care about facts. Lefties, in general, are of that mindset.
