New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

So, has “the dossier” now been verified?

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Comey did not testify she did anything illegal.
Incorrect. She did plenty of things that were illegal. Just because Lynch's DOJ chose not to prosecute doesn't mean she didn't.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/james-comey-testimony-clinton-email-225224
... Clinton’s statement that she did not email classified material to anyone, Comey responded, “There was classified email.”...


...Asked about Clinton’s claim that all work-related emails were returned to State, Comey said that was not true....


...."I don't think that our investigation established she was actually particularly sophisticated with respect to classified information and the levels and treatment," Comey said.

"Isn't she an original classification authority though?" DeSantis asked, to which Comey responded, "Yes, Sir, yes, Sir."...

.... “Is it your statement, then, before this committee that Secretary Clinton should have known not to send classified material and yet she did?” Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) asked as the hearing extended to its third hour.

“Certainly she should have known not to send classified information,” Comey said. “As I said, that's the definition of negligent. I think she was extremely careless. I think she was negligent. That I could establish. What we can't establish is that she acted with the necessary criminal intent.”.....


...As he concluded his questioning, Chaffetz asked whether Clinton gave “non-cleared people access to classified information.”

“Yes,” Comey said, repeating, “Yes.”....
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Or someone frames a victim...... with fake info created by the intelligence community to overthrow a sitting president
Which is a crime. Do you think that should be investigated? I do.

The whining about a "coup" from the Alt-Right is as tiresome as the accusations of racism from the Left for every disagreement with Obama. It's lame.
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
The report of a crime is enough. What crime has been reported? It is not illegal to pay someone to gather dirt on a political appointee, even if they are the citizen of another country. A Fisa warrant was obtained because of Carter Page's claim to be an advisor for the Kremlin at the same time he was on the Trump campaign. During that time a crime was committed when the DNC email server was hacked. All that made him a possible connection between the Trump campaign and a crime.
Agreed a report is enough.

There are reports of malfeasance and those reports should be investigated with impartial oversight.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Which is a crime. Do you think that should be investigated? I do.

The whining about a "coup" from the Alt-Right is as tiresome as the accusations of racism from the Left for every disagreement with Obama. It's lame.
It is being investigated and it is and or was part of a failed coup. Steel said his intent was to stop Trumps election
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
It is being investigated and it is and or was part of a failed coup. Steel said his intent was to stop Trumps election
ROFL. Okay, dude. You're free to believe it was "coup" but realize I think that's a stupid, spineless and as lame as the accusations of racism by the Lefties every time someone disagreed with Obama.

BTW, a coup d'état isn't stopping an election, it's deposing someone who is in power. Try using a dictionary. Here, let me help: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d'état
the overthrow of an existing government; typically, this refers to an illegal, unconstitutional seizure of power by a dictator, the military, or a political faction.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
or suspect a crime has been committed.

Example: a college student reports a rape. Do the police know a rape was committed or do they only suspect a rape was committed because of the unsubstantiated report? Should they investigate or not?

Or create a fake dossier, try to plant spies in a campaign and spread false information.

THEN have a lackey slavishly devoted to my leftist base present it to an equally slavish judge- and whallaaaaa

An 'investigation'.

Had this been done 5 years ago- to another president your screams of racism would have been deafening.
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
ROFL. Okay, dude. You're free to believe it was "coup" but realize I think that's a stupid, spineless and as lame as the accusations of racism by the Lefties every time someone disagreed with Obama.
You are free to live in denial......

MAGA CONTINUES till 2024 at least
 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Or create a fake dossier, try to plant spies in a campaign and spread false information.

THEN have a lackey slavishly devoted to my leftist base present it to an equally slavish judge- and whallaaaaa

An 'investigation'.

Had this been done 5 years ago- to another president your screams of racism would have been deafening.
Nice rant, but full of false statements and ignorance. Sad.

 

Max R.

On the road
Supporting Member
Yea we know, fool...
I'm surprised you agree despite that fact I don't know who "we" is. Is it you and the mouse in your pants pocket? The other voices in your head?

BTW, I made this long ago so cry on someone else's shoulder. I have no sympathy for those who put political ideology ahead of the nation's best interests much less traitors and foreign operatives:



 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
I'm surprised you agree despite that fact I don't know who "we" is. Is it you and the mouse in your pants pocket? The other voices in your head?

BTW, I made this long ago so cry on someone else's shoulder. I have no sympathy for those who put political ideology ahead of the nation's best interests much less traitors and foreign operatives:



Yea we know that you do not know who we are.

Next

Q
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Incorrect. She did plenty of things that were illegal. Just because Lynch's DOJ chose not to prosecute doesn't mean she didn't.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/james-comey-testimony-clinton-email-225224
... Clinton’s statement that she did not email classified material to anyone, Comey responded, “There was classified email.”...


...Asked about Clinton’s claim that all work-related emails were returned to State, Comey said that was not true....


...."I don't think that our investigation established she was actually particularly sophisticated with respect to classified information and the levels and treatment," Comey said.

"Isn't she an original classification authority though?" DeSantis asked, to which Comey responded, "Yes, Sir, yes, Sir."...

.... “Is it your statement, then, before this committee that Secretary Clinton should have known not to send classified material and yet she did?” Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) asked as the hearing extended to its third hour.

“Certainly she should have known not to send classified information,” Comey said. “As I said, that's the definition of negligent. I think she was extremely careless. I think she was negligent. That I could establish. What we can't establish is that she acted with the necessary criminal intent.”.....


...As he concluded his questioning, Chaffetz asked whether Clinton gave “non-cleared people access to classified information.”

“Yes,” Comey said, repeating, “Yes.”....
Read the relevant law. Intent is key to determining if a crime was committed.

Remember that most email on her server that was determined to be classified was not marked as such and was only classified after the fact as it was reviewed.

Some material was pretty iffy. There was an email from some foreign dignitary that could only be called gossip. The sender marked it as "eyes only". The topic was some dirt on another diplomat or official in that country.
 

Nostra

Governor
Read the relevant law. Intent is key to determining if a crime was committed.

Remember that most email on her server that was determined to be classified was not marked as such and was only classified after the fact as it was reviewed.

Some material was pretty iffy. There was an email from some foreign dignitary that could only be called gossip. The sender marked it as "eyes only". The topic was some dirt on another diplomat or official in that country.
So, Hillary ACCIDENTLY set up her private server.

Hmmmm.....
 

RickWA

Senator
9. OPINION AND FACT
If a poster asserts something as fact, that poster must be prepared to give sources that show it is fact.


Now if you don't mind,

I'd like to see your homework, Rick.
It’s decades-long posting history of unbending fealty to party with precisely ZERO instances of any daylight between party position and poster content. Quite literally tens of thousands of documented posts - 100% party-propagandizing in EVERY case.

They are most certainly DNC-sponsored and HQ-deployed internet stooges.

Those who deny it are either liars or are in on it.
 
A central theme of Trump and his lackeys is that the Steele dossier was complete hooey, and that our intel people inappropriately considered its contents.

So, how does the accuracy of the dossier stand after the psssage of a couple of years and the issuance of the Mueller report?

Quite well, actually. It’s central themes have now been completely confirmed. Like all such documents, some of its details are still open to question, but the overall accuracy of the dossier is quite impressive.

Read about that for yourself here...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossier
No, it hasn't. But when has that ever stopped you nutters?
 
Top