New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

So, Mueller has now resigned from the DOJ

Bugsy McGurk

President
And he clearly does not want to testify before Congress.

The ball is now in the House’s court - do they still ask Mueller to testify? Do they subpoena him?

Should be interesting.
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
And he clearly does not want to testify before Congress.h

The ball is now in the House’s court - do they still ask Mueller to testify? Do they subpoena him?

Should be interesting.
Mueller:
IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO “

Only a Trump Toadie or consistent defender would take that as NO OBSTRUCTION and expect everyone else to just move on and ignore the obvious. As Trump said, he could go out on 5th Avenue and shoot someone and his base would still be with him.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Mueller:
IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO “

Only a Trump Toadie or consistent defender would take that as NO OBSTRUCTION and expect everyone else to just move on and ignore the obvious. As Trump said, he could go out on 5th Avenue and shoot someone and his base would still be with him.

You missed a part...

"We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime"
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
You missed a part...

"We did not however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime"
And as he said today and in his report, he did not do so out of fairness to Trump, since he could not be indicted and then try to “clear his name” at trial. Baghdad Barr distorted that sentence to convey the false impression that Trump wasn’t indicted due to insufficient evidence.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
And as he said today and in his report, he did not do so out of fairness to Trump, since he could not be indicted and then try to “clear his name” at trial. Baghdad Barr distorted that sentence to convey the false impression that Trump wasn’t indicted due to insufficient evidence.

He said today that their investigation was to capture evidence while fresh. Said evidence could be used to charge others with conspiracy. Which others were charged with conspiracy with Russia?
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
They always miss that part. LOL
I wrote what was on the screen of the TV...and heard with my own ears. They mean the same thing....Mueller obviously said that he couldn't say whether he did or he didn't.
BUT I did notice you defenders leave out the 10 possible obstructions he did lay out. Mueller knows he couldn't prosecute him, but leaving it up to Barr...who had already stated before Trump selected him (obviously the reason Trump selected him) that the investigation was bogus to begin with, you probably don't want to go over those 10 possible obstructions Mueller found. When you try to have someone fire the guy who is investigating you, it's pretty damn obvious, other than to a Trump Toadie or someone hell bent on defending his every action, that is obstruction.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
I wrote what was on the screen of the TV...and heard with my own ears. They mean the same thing....Mueller obviously said that he couldn't say whether he did or he didn't.
BUT I did notice you defenders leave out the 10 possible obstructions he did lay out. Mueller knows he couldn't prosecute him, but leaving it up to Barr...who had already stated before Trump selected him (obviously the reason Trump selected him) that the investigation was bogus to begin with, you probably don't want to go over those 10 possible obstructions Mueller found. When you try to have someone fire the guy who is investigating you, it's pretty damn obvious, other than to a Trump Toadie or someone hell bent on defending his every action, that is obstruction.
He said.. " we did not, however make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime"
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
And as he said today and in his report, he did not do so out of fairness to Trump, since he could not be indicted and then try to “clear his name” at trial. Baghdad Barr distorted that sentence to convey the false impression that Trump wasn’t indicted due to insufficient evidence.
Yes, he ALSO said in a letter to Barr that Barr didn't assess the report the way it was written. FACTS.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
He said today that their investigation was to capture evidence while fresh. Said evidence could be used to charge others with conspiracy. Which others were charged with conspiracy with Russia?
He was talking about the obstruction evidence there, which is the topic.
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
They always miss that part. LOL
Just like you miss the part...IF WE HAD CONFIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO “

In other words, Mueller didn't have confidence that the President was innocent (as he says he is) of committing a crime. RIGHT??
You can read it like you want, but he put out 10 times that Trump possibly did obstruct justice. That's all he was allowed to do. He was obviously leaving it up to Congress, who Trump thinks isn't worthy since the Democrats won the House.
 

NinaS

Senator
Supporting Member
He was talking about the obstruction evidence there, which is the topic.
It always goes back to that....he said NO COLLUSION, so they want to talk about that instead of the 10 times Trump did, obviously commit obstruction.
 
Top