So show us the whistleblowers- hell with anonymous accusations

[Nostra]

You are mischaracterizing impeachment

You are mischaracterizing the whistleblower complaint

Speculative.

You are incorrect from start to finish.

 

[make speed limit 45]

they will testify with their voice and face masked like whistleblowers do on 60 minutes

That's not gonna work for impeachment. The public won't stand for removing a president on anonymous accusations.

 

[Mick]

No, its not, He will get all his rights when the DOJ carts him away in handcuffs. Congress sets the rules for impeachment.

TDS is nasty! You can't name a crime but Democrats owe him no due process and the DOJ is going to put him in handcuffs? ROFL! You would think after flubbing up the 500 previous phony accusations you would have learned by now. The low IQ, welfare leeching, criminal part of the electorate is vulnerable to these scams.

 

[ObamacareForever]

That's not gonna work for impeachment. The public won't stand for removing a president on anonymous accusations.

At the end of the day Congress will be making the accusations. So there goes that argument.

 

[reason10]

They could in theory. Congress can impeach the president for looking at them wrong. The only check on their impeachment powers is elections.

Ask the Republicans how that worked out for them in the 1998 elections, after the liar/rapist was impeached.

 

[reason10]

No, its not, He will get all his rights when the DOJ carts him away in handcuffs. Congress sets the rules for impeachment.

The House isn't even voting on an impeachment inquiry. There will be no handcuffs (although it's looking better that Hillary might get a set of her own) when the House doesn't even have enough evidence for a vote on an inquiry.

Edited Pelosi is just using the word "Impeachment" as a campaign tool. (It's working pretty well, for the Republicans.) She knows the Democrat Clown Car can't Trump on the issues.

If there had been any impeachable offenses, the articles would already have been voted on and the Senate would already have exonerated the President and that would be it.

 

[ObamacareForever]

This isn't 1998, Trump's actions are not Clintons. Everything about this is different.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

This isn't 1998, Trump's actions are not Clintons. Everything about this is different.

Correct.

No Proof, evidence, no real House Inquiry. Just my base's leftist butt hurt.

And it's slowed down to nothing. Schiff knows he's toast. It fizzled.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

The House isn't even voting on an impeachment inquiry. There will be no handcuffs (although it's looking better that Hillary might get a set of her own) when the House doesn't even have enough evidence for a vote on an inquiry.

Edited Pelosi is just using the word "Impeachment" as a campaign tool. (It's working pretty well, for the Republicans.) She knows the Democrat Clown Car can't Trump on the issues.

If there had been any impeachable offenses, the articles would already have been voted on and the Senate would already have exonerated the President and that would be it.

Correct.

There is no HOUSE impeachment inquiry.

It's a democrat one.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Correct.

No Proof, evidence, no real House Inquiry. Just my base's leftist butt hurt.

And it's slowed down to nothing. Schiff knows he's toast. It fizzled.

It's been like a week, you are just going to need be patient.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Do they even exist or is this is all more lies from the dems and Big Media?. Just like the mueller investiagation.

Why are you Trumpies so against the Rule of Law regarding whistleblowers?
I'll tell you why. It's because you're authoritarians who want daddy to rule unimpeded.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

they will testify with their voice and face masked like whistleblowers do on 60 minutes

I hope the House Dems protect this whistleblower. Trump already incited violence against him/her by wrongly calling him a spy and reminding that we used to execute spies back in the day. I'm sure Trumpies got the message.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

Why are you Trumpies so against the Rule of Law regarding whistleblowers?
I'll tell you why. It's because you're authoritarians who want daddy to rule unimpeded.

The transcript , the connections and the law firm hired already show this wasn't whistleblowing.

Just partisan butthurt.

 

[Nostra]

It's been like a week, you are just going to need be patient.

Hehe. Same story we have been hearing for 3 years.

 

[Nostra]

Why are you Trumpies so against the Rule of Law regarding whistleblowers?
I'll tell you why. It's because you're authoritarians who want daddy to rule unimpeded.

There is no whistleblower.

 

[make speed limit 45]

Why are you Trumpies so against the Rule of Law regarding whistleblowers?
I'll tell you why. It's because you're authoritarians who want daddy to rule unimpeded.

We are not against rule of law re whistleblowers. But we do point out that WBs have no credibility. They are anonymous accusers.

 

[make speed limit 45]

It's been like a week, you are just going to need be patient.

HAHAHA. We were patient for two years on the mueller investigation and it produced nothing.

 

[ObamacareForever]

We are not against rule of law re whistleblowers. But we do point out that WBs have no credibility. They are anonymous accusers.

Like Deep Throat?

 

[ObamacareForever]

HAHAHA. We were patient for two years on the mueller investigation and it produced nothing.

what does that have to do with anything going on here?

 

[ObamacareForever]

There is no whistleblower.

Another lie.