The impact of the economic crisis and the US embargo on health in Cuba.
Leaves you wondering what kind of leadership in Cuba for several decades would allow this to happen to their population. All of it for the sake of dictatorial power decade after decade under a false a facade of democracy.The impact of the economic crisis and the US embargo on health in Cuba.
CONCLUSIONS: To be consistent with international humanitarian law, embargoes must not impede access to essential humanitarian goods. Yet this embargo has raised the cost of medical supplies and food Rationing, universal access to primary health services, a highly educated population, and preferential access to scarce goods for women and children help protect most Cubans from what otherwise might have been a health disaster.The impact of the economic crisis and the US embargo on health in Cuba.
OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the combined effects of a severe economic decline since 1989 and a tightening of the US embargo in 1992 on health and health care in Cuba. METHODS: Data from surveillance systems for nutrition, reportable diseases, and ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Leaves you with nothing, nite.
So you think "make America Great Again" means Make America different? That's just stupid. You're just babbling. You haven't made a coherent point supported by reality
I said that, sparky. Try to keep up
ForeverObama is making some bizarre point that has to do that if Trump ever told a lie then something. I'm waiting to hear what "something" means since obviously Trump has told a lie before. More than one ...
Which is f*cking over consumers.
how is something not yet created and brought to market, and subsequently stolen, [Unwelcome language removed] over the consumers?
the consumer is fucked over because now nobody wants to make a God damn thing because it's all being stolen all over the place because of these protections that you don't care to have that are now removed.
There will still be inventions if patent protections are removed. There are still new technologies being developed in places where patent protections are far weaker.
That will continue to diminish as people become more cognizant of the fact that they're hard investment is being stolen from them oh, such that they will be less likely to risk it
It's a bit presumptuous to assume they are not cognizant of the risks right now.
Trump did away with ACA fines
I didn't presume any such thing. We were discussing patent protection and your desire to allow intellectual property to be stolen.
I don't believe knowledge is property. You certainty don't have to share it, but people can come to come the same intellectual conclusion independent of each of other and they owe one another nothing.
Fail
Do you believe that where knowledge is applied with specificity, let's say to the derivation of a particular treatment for cancer, that the person or persons expending that intellectual capital and perhaps significant monies, are entitled to recoup some aspects of that investment?
Nobody is entitled to anything.
If there is a demand for it, a supplier will fill it. The patent system just makes that process less efficient.
