I know that ass-face Greasy Grass is the ridge above what the Wasichu (sp) called the Little Bighorn River.And by the way, Greasy Grass IS your Little Bighorn. Little Bighorn is NOT a direct translation for the place.
And I will expand on that, asswipe. Waiscun or Waischu is not directly translated into Little Bighorn. I'll let you see if you can discover what it truly means, if you are so intelligent.I know that ass-face Greasy Grass is the ridge above what the Wasichu (sp) called the Little Bighorn River.
It means White men, dumbass. The Greasy Grass was the ridge above the river the White Men called the Little Bighorn.And I will expand on that, asswipe. Waiscun or Waischu is not directly translated into Little Bighorn. I'll let you see if you can discover what it truly means, if you are so intelligent.
Wrong, dumbass. Wasicun or Waischu in another dialect means 'that which has power', as in the river. Just another white man error when it comes to comprehending Native languages. Wasinicu is what whites thought was Waischu means 'steals the fat'. This is what whites were called. Just like the name Sioux came from an Anishnaabe word, and of course the whites didn't comprehend. So go pretend somewhere else how educated you are.It means White men, dumbass. The Greasy Grass was the ridge above the river the White Men called the Little Bighorn.
Not the sharpest crayon in the box, are you Jocko.It means White men, dumbass. The Greasy Grass was the ridge above the river the White Men called the Little Bighorn.
Tell you what, Jocko. I'll give you a challenge. Not only did some of the braves have Spencers and Henrys, but some of them were carried by whites who fought with the warriors, but I challenge you to prove that is what tipped the battle away from Custer. First of all, the repeaters would jam as the copper jackets overheated and expanded, and they were not as accurate at the Springfield. Secondly, forensic evidence shows that war clubs, lances and arrows account for the majority of the casualties, with the exception of 'friendly fire'. Now, try to prove to me otherwise.I probably know more about greasy grass and the Little Bighorn than you do. I wrote a book about it. My guess is that you don't know that the soldiers were armed with single shot Springfield Carbines and Colt pistols while many of the Indians had Henry repeating rifles. This was not commonly known until archaeological discoveries late in the last century. Blame is often placed on Custer's dividing his forces but the truth is he was so outgunned that the 7th Cavalry never had a chance even if he had kept all his troops together. Reno's Company only survived because he managed to take a strong defensive position and the Indians attacked en mass head on.
And a coup, is the overthrow of a standing government. usually by ts military. Counting coo is the practice, often used by Native Americans in the past, of rushing into a crowd of enemy warriors and hitting one, either with the hand or a stick, in order to show ones' bravery with no intent to injure or kill.
All that doesn't much matter. What tipped the scales against Custer was that he assumed he was facing less than a thousand Indians when in fact there were three times that number. Also, he did not know the lay of the land as well as they did. The Indians were able to approach the troopers using the ravines, undetected. It was a perfect storm against Custer, His arrogance overrode his judgement.Tell you what, Jocko. I'll give you a challenge. Not only did some of the braves have Spencers and Henrys, but some of them were carried by whites who fought with the warriors, but I challenge you to prove that is what tipped the battle away from Custer. First of all, the repeaters would jam as the copper jackets overheated and expanded, and they were not as accurate at the Springfield. Secondly, forensic evidence shows that war clubs, lances and arrows account for the majority of the casualties, with the exception of 'friendly fire'. Now, try to prove to me otherwise.
Even the bottom of the crayon is sharper than you, Wahoo. You think that your being a Native American gives you a knowledge of history that no one else has but it doesn't. You only know what you read, just like me.Not the sharpest crayon in the box, are you Jocko.
Wrong, dumbass. Wasicun or Waischu in another dialect means 'that which has power', as in the river. Just another white man error when it comes to comprehending Native languages. Wasinicu is what whites thought was Waischu means 'steals the fat'. This is what whites were called. Just like the name Sioux came from an Anishnaabe word, and of course the whites didn't comprehend. So go pretend somewhere else how educated you are.
That's what I said.Waischu means 'steals the fat'. This is what whites were called.
You should go over to Denny's and tell them you're a Native American, give them a $1.50, and they'll give you a free cup of coffee.Tell you what, Jocko. I'll give you a challenge. Not only did some of the braves have Spencers and Henrys, but some of them were carried by whites who fought with the warriors, but I challenge you to prove that is what tipped the battle away from Custer. First of all, the repeaters would jam as the copper jackets overheated and expanded, and they were not as accurate at the Springfield. Secondly, forensic evidence shows that war clubs, lances and arrows account for the majority of the casualties, with the exception of 'friendly fire'. Now, try to prove to me otherwise.
Hahahaha, go ahead, Jocko. You proved how much you know by your translation of Waischu. Your problem is what you are reading and who wrote it, a chimookamon. Have you ever heard of 'Elders' (akiwanzii)? Most likely not. That is like having your grandfather tell YOU of life when HE was a child. Why waste my time, you've got CCS. Can't Comprehend Sh*t.Even the bottom of the crayon is sharper than you, Wahoo. You think that your being a Native American gives you a knowledge of history that no one else has but it doesn't. You only know what you read, just like me.
No you didn't, I pointed out your ignorance. Waischu does not mean white men.That's what I said.
Wow, now all that doesn't matter. First you bring up repeating rifles, I debunk that, and now it doesn't matter. You never did read Black Elks account of that day like I suggested did you, Jocko?All that doesn't much matter. What tipped the scales against Custer was that he assumed he was facing less than a thousand Indians when in fact there were three times that number. Also, he did not know the lay of the land as well as they did. The Indians were able to approach the troopers using the ravines, undetected. It was a perfect storm against Custer, His arrogance overrode his judgement.
The only thing you've debunked is the theory that you went past the 8th grade in school.Wow, now all that doesn't matter. First you bring up repeating rifles, I debunk that, and now it doesn't matter. You never did read Black Elks account of that day like I suggested did you, Jocko?
Keep treading water, Jocko. You were probably doing the 8th grade for the 8th time, when I received my MBA.The only thing you've debunked is the theory that you went past the 8th grade in school.
You must be one terrific MBA if you worship Obama after what he has done to small business in this country.Keep treading water, Jocko. You were probably doing the 8th grade for the 8th time, when I received my MBA.
I don't worship Obama, Jocko. But Obama hasn't done anymore than Bush has. At least my education comes from a solid economic base. You just throw shit at the wall and hope it sticks. It's a good thing you corrected your remark before I saw it. I would have added it to the Jocko fvck up file, so the next time you become a loud mouthed pissant about someone's error I could eulogize it.You must be one terrific MBA if you worship Obama after what he has done to small business in this country.
Which remark was that, Oh "educated" one?I don't worship Obama, Jocko. But Obama hasn't done anymore than Bush has. At least my education comes from a solid economic base. You just throw shit at the wall and hope it sticks. It's a good thing you corrected your remark before I saw it. I would have added it to the Jocko fvck up file, so the next time you become a loud mouthed pissant about someone's error I could eulogize it.
This thread was about Hoffa, and you've turned it into everything but. And why? Because as always you have nothing contributory or constructive to say. So you just have your brain farts, and enjoy yourself. Oh....... and fvck off.
"You must be one terrific up MBA if you worship Obama after what he has done to small business in this country."Which remark was that, Oh "educated" one?