New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Sorry, guys... no comfy balls for you!

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
Just so you know, kids bullshit their elders' brains out about such matters.

;-)
Ain't that the truth. I laugh at how so many...not all...seem to forget how they bullshitted their parents when they were young.

It isn't unusual for girls to begin puberty at 10. With the heavy sexualization of women in our society, it only makes sense to begin more serious sexual education around that age.

I think about a family I am very familiar with. The parents are my age, they have 3 fabulous daughters. They knew they did everything "right" to raise "good" girls. Church, strong academics, fairly conservative politics...the whole deal. All three of these daughters today are married and are all mothers themselves. One is a published author, one a dancer, choreographer and dance teacher and the other a marine biologist. They can only be called successful in their careers and marriages. As they became friends with their parents, they divulged a different tale. They were all hellraisers and each one lost their virginity at 14. No...that is not 12, but it will arrive quickly.

I'm always interested in the answers to a few questions when this debate comes up: I'm not afraid to answer them.

1. When did you lose your virginity? Did it happen the first time you thought about it?

For me, 17...and hell no. Got very close at 14. Was on the verge for nearly a year in 10th and 11th grade. About halfway through Senior year...

2. Did your parents talk to you about such matters?

No. They left that up to my older sister and Playboy.

:cool:
 

LeilaniMP

Empress
LOLOLOL

Somehow, this strikes me as hilarious... "PackageFront Technology?" LOLOLOL


A Scandinavian men's underwear brand named Comfyballs simply will not fly in America, says the U.S. Patent and Trade Office.

The agency has denied the Norwegian company's application to register the trademark in the U.S., calling the name 'vulgar.'

The company was born in 2013 and quickly moved to the UK, New Zealand and Australia where it promises its underwear--designed with PackageFront technology--reduces heat while allowing for freer movement.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2868788/No-Comfyballs-America-Patent-office-says-Norwegian-men-s-underwear-trademark-vulgar-sale-U-S.html#ixzz3LX88ldC4
 

Barbella

Senator
Hehe, speaking of emotionally stunted, sex makes you super uncomfortable, doesn't it?
Why don't you ask the same question of Phil, who shares my opinion on this issue? Because he's a MAN?

So you're not only an arrogant fool, but a sexist one, at that. So noted.
 

Barbella

Senator
You gibbering twit -- I accused him of a puritanical attitude about sex before I said anything of the sort to you. Is this because he's a man? Politically correct, identity-politics grievance mongering is particularly funny coming from you.
Why don't you tell him how he's emotionally stunted, and ask him if sex makes him super uncomfortable?

I mean, c'mon... get personal with him like you did with me, and inquire about HIS sex life.... or is that something you only do with women?

Has your wife divorced you yet? I'm pretty sure it's only a matter of time, given your attitude. Do you call her "little lady" and make her serve your friends?
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
I don't know your kid and make no assumptions. But EVERY parent thinks it won't happen to their kid. Many millions of the parents are proven wrong.

oh. I see. so, you didn't take offense at your presumed assumption that i'd leave my kid unprotected. then yammer on about the burdens of STDs... and then follow it up with another assumption that you'd have to keep your fingers crossed for him, and well the cherry on top assumption on puritanism


per your below..


"Well, I find it offensive that you'd leave your child unprotected by that knowledge, especially since the cost of that STD or pregnancy is fairly likely to fall on the rest of us taxpayers. I guess we can both keep our fingers crossed that your kid, unlike so many others cursed with puritanical parents who failed to arm them with knowledge, doesn't become a statistic"

ok, well, check.. no assumptions.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
No. Because you stake your child's life on the idea that he's so immune to basic biological urges that he needn't be armed with information to keep him safe.
again. absent a [Unwelcome language removed] clue....there you go embellishing .. 'staking his life' 'immune to urges' 'neednt be armed'

first of all, he's a child. a few years to go. so what I will do or what will be... kinda speculative.

but, rest assured, i'm not some pissant that's going to fold or shirk my responsibilities and foist some burden on anyone. what would make you surmise that I think that he, or any kid for that matter is immune to urges...or needent be armed with info?

all I said was it's not planned parenthoods responsibility, the community, or the schools responsibility.

that's my job, and how and when is by my decision and timetable..

call me old fashioned... I still have the stones to hold on to my responsibilities..
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
You gibbering twit -- I accused him of a puritanical attitude about sex before I said anything of the sort to you. Is this because he's a man? Politically correct, identity-politics grievance mongering is particularly funny coming from you.
hey, so phil likes to get it on like anyone else. I even remember 'Puritan' magazine..

so there.

now. I strike your post for the gibbering twit comment. stick to craftier more subtle insults...
 

Barbella

Senator
I suggested he sounded like a bad parent to me. Just how personal would you like me to get?

I dunno... ask him how his sex life is...

It's funny to hear such a racist poster playing the identity-politics card like this. Ask around -- I'm arrogant and insulting to everyone here, regardless of gender.
Awwww.... let's throw some "racist" into the mix...
You've already shown yourself to be so many other things... why not add "race baiter"?

I'm out, don't bother responding.
 

Arkady

President
hey, so phil likes to get it on like anyone else. I even remember 'Puritan' magazine..

so there.

now. I strike your post for the gibbering twit comment. stick to craftier more subtle insults...
Ok, my inner troll has gotten out of control. Time for a break.
 

gigi

Mayor
I think you're reading into the material stuff that isn't there, if you're even getting that from the links I provided. Are you uncomfortable with premarital sex? If so, then it's possible that your feelings on the topic are causing you to see as encouragement anything that doesn't expressly reflect your revulsion. At least in the materials I found, Planned Parenthood is entirely neutral on it. They simply state facts and provide advice for protecting yourself.
You need to keep digging. PP has put out quite a number of plain out pornographic cartoons with reference to sexual behavior, particularly masturbation. Some they have abandoned due to public demand but the material is still out there. Some they continue to use. It's one thing to answer questions. It's another thing entirely to create the questions and then include a cartoon of a boy sitting on the edge of his bed pulling on his penis and moral judgement in the answer.
 

gigi

Mayor
You're rambling. Presumably you're referring to Margaret Sanger. She was anti-abortion, and wanted legal contraception, in part, to reduce abortions:

http://www.bartleby.com/1013/10.html

In her autobiography she wrote "[In 1916] we explained what contraception was; that abortion was the wrong way no matter how early it was performed it was taking life; that contraception was the better way, the safer way—it took a little time, a little trouble, but was well worth while in the long run, because life had not yet begun."
She was also very devoted to eugenics to "weed out" the "Human Weeds" who were unfit to parent and to live. That would be anyone with mental or physical disabilities and minorities. She was very plain about it. Hitler was a big fan.
 

gigi

Mayor
whoever above provided a link to i think a fox article within which were three reference materials - gender identification, sex checklist, consent checklist.

i think these discussions are no one business but the parents, at the age in question.

what business PP has, or the school has usurping that dialogue is my question and concern
Phil,
Several former PP employees as well as former owners and employees of "Family Planning" clinics have plainly said that the agenda is to deliberately usurp the parents' role in teaching about sex. They do this by confusing the kids into thinking that their parents are out of touch, do not understand their feelings, will not admit that their children are grown up, and will not take it well if their children express to them that they are sexually curious or wish to become sexually active. They yak and yak about "kids can't talk to their parents" but the reality is that THEY are the ones promoting this idea to kids that their parents will not help them or understand. The purpose is money and the success of undermining a child's confidence in his/her parents by implying an adversarial relationship.
It used to work really well for their agenda. But now they're having some problems because these kids are being raised by parents who were originally sold this garbage, vowed never to be like the image they were sold of their own parents, and DO initiate conversations with their kids about sex. IT's hard to convince a kid that her mom won't understand that she's a sexual being when it's mom that opens the dialogue.
So they go for younger kids now, in the hopes of getting them before their parents start that dialogue.
 
Z

zzigzzag

Guest
so much potential here... comfy balls.. comfy balls...

let's see..

innuendo...

double entendre...

what to do what to do...

ah ha... a visual....

View attachment 26327
innuendo?

double entendre...


I automatically took the second line to be a reference to the one above it.

Is the second meaning a gay, Latino pick-up line?

(I'm blaming that one on you. I don't care.)
 
Top