New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

SPLC Co-Founder Fired - Allegations of Racism, Sexual Harassment

Dino

Russian Asset
That's just the latest example of him being unapologetic. As for his racism that's was documented in both our legal courts and the court of public opinion. Where he was also unapologetic since the govt had to take him to court twice for the same racist business practices.

From this shooter's own words we know Trump helped inspire him. You go ahead and defend that, but you can't call it made up. It happened.
So still nothing. Nothing personally, just business practices called into question in court.
You’re doing a rather good job of making the case the left is full of crap.
 

Spamature

President
So still nothing. Nothing personally, just business practices called into question in court.
You’re doing a rather good job of making the case the left is full of crap.
What do you mean by "nothing" ? It's a family business that he ran. He was directly in charge of the racist policy. Or do you mean him being a racist is just nothing to you ?
 
Last edited:

Dino

Russian Asset
What do you mean by "nothing" ? It's a family business that he ran. He was directly in charge of the racist policy. Or do you mean him being a racist is just nothing to you ?
No. It certainly means something when you make a definitive charge and then can’t back it up with literally anything. That doesn’t mean nothing. It means you’re totally full of shit.
 

EatTheRich

President
No. It certainly means something when you make a definitive charge and then can’t back it up with literally anything. That doesn’t mean nothing. It means you’re totally full of shit.
He provided evidence of among other things racist business practices. That you choose to call that “nothing” doesn’t mean you have rebutted it.
 

Dino

Russian Asset
He provided evidence of among other things racist business practices. That you choose to call that “nothing” doesn’t mean you have rebutted it.
A court dispute involving a charge of racist business practices makes an individual an “unapologetic liar”?
That’s ridiculous.
 

EatTheRich

President
A court dispute involving a charge of racist business practices makes an individual an “unapologetic liar”?
That’s ridiculous.
The claim was that he was an “unapologetic racist.” And his history of discrimination so bad even the look-the-other-way Nixon administration felt obligated to sue makes the case.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
In case you didn’t notice, the NYT piece I linked to was an opinion piece by Charles Murray where he talked about burning a cross as a youth.

ADF has called for everything I said they did, even if they try to present a less extreme face to the unwary public.
It was a bad opinion.
 
S

Sickofleft

Guest
Just shows that they don’t put up with the same kind of garbage they combat.
The guy who was fired was there since the founding in 71. Odd they would put up with it for 50 years, is 50 years the time limit on such behavior? :rolleyes:

Sure, at that time they were founded they were taking to bankrupt the Klan etc. certainly a worthy cause.

After that in the decades that followed, they stood for whatever made them the most money, including maligning groups they found not be PC in order to raise as much money as possible.... useful idiots like yourself probably donated.

Ideological Scumbags by any other name...
 

EatTheRich

President
The guy who was fired was there since the founding in 71. Odd they would put up with it for 50 years, is 50 years the time limit on such behavior? :rolleyes:

Sure, at that time they were founded they were taking to bankrupt the Klan etc. certainly a worthy cause.

After that in the decades that followed, they stood for whatever made them the most money, including maligning groups they found not be PC in order to raise as much money as possible.... useful idiots like yourself probably donated.

Ideological Scumbags by any other name...
Obviously the behavior just came to light.

Their mission hasn’t changed at all. It’s just that some of the scumbags they go after like to whine about “PC.”
 
S

Sickofleft

Guest
Obviously the behavior just came to light.

Their mission hasn’t changed at all. It’s just that some of the scumbags they go after like to whine about “PC.”

Keep telling yourself that. They have a nasty habit of labeling any group that does not agree with them as a "hate group" F-K them...
 

EatTheRich

President
They label ANY group that does not agree with them as a hate group. It raises more money that way off of useful idiots. "Raising money" was all they were about after the Klan success.
The only thing they stand for is opposition to racism, sexism, homophobia, and religious prejudice. Any group that disagrees with them on that is by definition a hate group.
 
S

Sickofleft

Guest
The only thing they stand for is opposition to racism, sexism, homophobia, and religious prejudice. Any group that disagrees with them on that is by definition a hate group.
The only thing they have come to stand for is making as much money as possible.
 
Top