Bugsy McGurk
President
A good example is where criminals physically assault or kill someone.After they.....do what....?
A good example is where criminals physically assault or kill someone.After they.....do what....?
I don’t think the police can actually “charge” a person on the spot (charging them involves the DA or AG) but they certainly routinely arrest them. on the spot. In fact in Mr. Floyd’s case and several others it seems that the police even kill them on the spot, saving the DA a lot of tiresome paperwork. That’s the reason for all of these massive protests around our great country these past few days.No. The police frequently charge people on the spot.
No problem, it’s confusing sometimes.
No they don'tNo. The police frequently charge people on the spot.
Eh there were not 3 standing with guns drawn, your 4 blacks or the 4 cops...…..I did not lie Dawg. My post contained a hypothetical regarding 4 fictional black men. My point was that the police routinely arrest people without first conducting an investigation on the scene as a Dino suggested. In fact, Mr. Floyd was arrested and murdered on the street before any extensive investigation was done regarding the allegation against him. See what I mean?
so what? I didn’t lie about anything as you accused me of. I was trying to point out that cops routinely arrest people without investigating the case for days. Over 5000 looters and vandals have already been arrested, many with the assistance of the protestors who pointed them out and had video evidence which will be used to prosecute them. This is a great country.Eh there were not 3 standing with guns drawn, your 4 blacks or the 4 cops...…..
all charged with crimes not looters can be fired
Good thing Bostonians didn't believe that in the 1770'sUmmm, yeah you do. The minute someone's property gets burned down or someone gets beaten, it becomes wrong.
They didn't burn down anything or beat anyone.Good thing Bostonians didn't believe that in the 1770's
They arrest killers on the spot? When does this happen? The guy kills somebody and then stands around waiting for the police to come while he stands there bathed in blood and still holding the murder weapon.A good example is where criminals physically assault or kill someone.
Oh please. You love the looters and rioters- It's what left always does.That‘s bullshit. I have never condoned or supported nor made excuses for any criminal thugs who loot, burn and assault people. However I do understand why millions of Americans are protesting this latest travesty against black Americans which has been ongoing for 400 years.
That was me.When did you change your mind? Yesterday you thought it was as American as the Boston tea party.
Either way, I'm glad you finally came around.
liberals like Samuel Adams who looted and rioted.Oh please. You love the looters and rioters- It's what left always does.
The Tea Party was not a riot. Please get your history straight.That was me.
The Boston massacre, 1770, was a riot to which the proper authorities overreacted and brought in the military.
Their authoritarian response backfired. No thanks to people with your mentality.
The tea party was another riot in which rioters looted privately owned ships and threw their merchandise into the harbor.
Thank God the Bostonian's of the 1770's did not now to the authorities, and instead rioted and looted in spite of lawful orders to disperse.
Sam Adams shoot a black cop in the head ?liberals like Samuel Adams who looted and rioted.
lol.They didn't burn down anything or beat anyone.
There is a huge difference between covert vandalism and rioting.
I accidentally confused him and @Jack4freedom in another thread, and I couldn't have apologized enough. @Jack4freedom is a far more thoughtful poster.Fake is a drama queen & Retarded. I apologize for him.
throwing merchandise in the harbor is the same as burning down buildings and beating people to you?lol.
Um.....take a history class. yes they did. and they looted and threw the merchandise into the harbor
Of course it was a riot. "Demonstrators, some disguised as Native Americans, destroyed an entire shipment of tea sent by the East India Company."The Tea Party was not a riot. Please get your history straight.
And the Boston Massacre was between Americans and the British. One of many scuffles. It didn't start out with Americans burning down their towns and killing other Americans.
Of course it was a riot. "Demonstrators, some disguised as Native Americans, destroyed an entire shipment of tea sent by the East India Company."
And by the way, it was between the British gov. and British citizens, and yes it did start out with British subjects burning down their own towns and killing other British subjects.
There weren't any Americans until years later.
Get your history straight.