Sadly, you choose to focus on anti-US parts of the information and completely miss all else. The facts related to the Panama Canal are less anti-US than you'd admit. The "unarmed civilians" you claim killed by the US were participating in a riot that also killed four US soldiers. I'm thinking those soldiers didn't die of natural causes. If you want to debate the legality of the US treaty and control of the canal zone then that is a different thread.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyrs'_Day_(Panama) <---the U.S. killed unarmed civilians in its effort to hold on to the canal zone
Just as they murdered civilians in Puerto Rico http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponce_massacre and the Philippines
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moro_Crater_massacre
No, the U.S. did not launch a full-scale invasion of Panama and watch Panama and the rest of Central America ally itself with the Soviet Union and Cuba. Yes, the U.S. did give up its installation at Subic Bay after it was destroyed by a volcano http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo#Aftermath_of_the_1991_eruption
It's hard to know what the majority thinks in Puerto Rico since people who express pro-independence views are given some of the longest prison sentences in the world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_López_Rivera
or gunned down by the FBI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibertjeda_Ríos
The French used to claim, with the support of referenda, polls, and an imposed silence, that the majority of Algerians supported Algeria's being part of France. Turned out, next to no Algerian Moors or Berbers did so.
No, Subic bay was not abandoned due to Pinatubo. The shutdown was already in progress long before the volcano erupted. We should have left the Phillipines a long time before we did, but that isn't a reason to put out fictional versions of history.